Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't think so.We know in the same way we know how big the Moon is...
I don't think so.
More like you guys know in the same way as you "know" how we got our moon -- i.e. five different methods to choose from.
If you know them so well, what are they called?
A Felix domesticus is a housecat.
A Pilohippus is a _____ .
Ya -- just by coincidence -- everything happens to be extinct, doesn't it?I think you mean Pliohippus, and it's an extinct species that is currently viewed as the ancestor of the modern horse.
If it's a parody of fundamentalist liberalism, I guess that would be a Poe too. Presumably, fundamentalist liberalism would be people who don't understand liberalism but shout its slogans anyway, abusing the opposition with a hoity-toity holier-than-thou attitude, driving hybrid cars without really knowing anything about climate change, etc.
Don't get me wrong, I'm as liberal as they come, but some liberals are... annoying
Ya -- just by coincidence -- everything happens to be extinct, doesn't it?
Unless, of course, it's a coelacanth.
Like I said elsewhere, the evidence on the Moon's origins is insufficient to conclude which of the various origin hypotheses is right. But so what? The evidence for evolution is far in excess of the evidence for the Moon's origin.I don't think so.
More like you guys know in the same way as you "know" how we got our moon -- i.e. five different methods to choose from.
It's just a Pilohippus. And I think you mean Felis catus.If you know them so well, what are they called?
A Felix domesticus is a housecat.
A Pilohippus is a _____ .
The fossil record can take a hike.
All you guys do is draw a line [of faith] between these drawings to connect the dots.
You don't know if that Hyracotherium turned into a Mesohippus, and then into a Merychippus, and then into a Pliohippus, etc; you just assume they did.
And the fact that these are drawings shows even more faith.
You guys like to accuse us of god-of-the-gaps, but the biggest fillers of gaps are scientists who prefer an easel to a clipboard.
AV, why don't you apply your scepticism to the Bible?
How dare I?
Science and the Bible have been drifting apart for some time now.You do seem to apply one standard to science and another to the bible. Why?
It may also be a result of their love and affection for cute animals. I blame Walt Disney.I think people just say they believe in evolution because all their friends pretend to be atheist and therefore they too must believe in evolution, because of peer pressure.
That's a very good point.Did you see your great grandparents? Or their parents? Or theirs?
If not, they did not exist. If you think they did, then you are assuming something that you have not seen take place
Do you think any of them might have looked like this?That's a very good point.
But of all the grandparents and great grandparents I've seen none of them were this hairy, cute and cuddly. So I can assume none of my grandparents looked like this:
Ya know, 15 million years is a long time. Horses that are dated 15 million years apart say very little about transition, especially when each horse looks like a complete horse. One can interpret this as different species of horse existing in different geological times. So what?Horses have one of the most well-documented and complete fossil histories known to man, a few of which are shown in this famous picture:
.
Ya know, 15 million years is a long time. Horses that are dated 15 million years apart say very little about transition, especially when each horse looks like a complete horse. One can interpret this as different species of horse existing in different geological times. So what?
The point is that the density of body hairs on humans is about the same as on other primates so any argument against evolution based on apes being hairier than humans is meaningless.No. Too young.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?