If what I have read about statute of limitations in Alabama is correct, the law there would need to change in order to make that a reality.
"Christianity" does not have a particular expertise on recognizing evil.
The only real perverts seem to be in Alabama hiding behind cheap religious platitudes and stunts.
Please explain to me the difference between "objectification of women" and "lusting after women".
To vote for Roy Moore, you need only do one thing: Don't believe any of his victims.
It's one thing to find a woman physically attractive. It's another to assume that her body should be available for usage by right.
The attitudes of a certain genital-grabbing politician comes to mind here. Just thinking you can walk into a women's dressing room because you are paying the bills is a perfect example of the objectification of women.
The Statue of Limitations itself needs to change and be done away with. I really don't see what purpose it serves other than a literal 'get out of jail free' card for people fortunate enough to evade justice for that amount of time.
Is that not sufficient purpose for you? To protect the accused's right to due process?
"Objectifying women" is not in my vocabulary, but if the feminist Puritans who use is simply mean "lust", I wonder why they don't simply say "lust".
If he owns the property, and owns the event, then actually he can. It's part of the job. Not saying it's right, I'm not really a fan of beauty pageants either, but it's what those ladies signed up for.
If he owns the property, and owns the event, then actually he can. It's part of the job. Not saying it's right, I'm not really a fan of beauty pageants either, but it's what those ladies signed up for.
Given that this guy ran strip clubs in his casinos, there's no reason why this should come as a shocker.
The likelihood of a fair trial decreases as time passes, since people's memories get foggier, evidence disappears or degrades, potential witnesses are harder to find, etc. Typically, only the most heinous of crimes like murder don't have a statute of limitations.The Statue of Limitations itself needs to change and be done away with. I really don't see what purpose it serves other than a literal 'get out of jail free' card for people fortunate enough to evade justice for that amount of time.
If he owns the property, and owns the event, then actually he can. It's part of the job. Not saying it's right, I'm not really a fan of beauty pageants either, but it's what those ladies signed up for.
Even if all the accusations were true (and most definitely they are not) one often supports not the individual, but the positions they uphold. Roy Moore was clearly the superior candidate due to his positions for many people. Saying "supporting Roy Moore isn't consistent with Christianity" is a really close-minded way to look at the situation.
So, It's okay to visit a relative at their house. And they could grab your genital. And body parts. Since it's their property.If he owns the property, and owns the event, then actually he can. It's part of the job. Not saying it's right, I'm not really a fan of beauty pageants either, but it's what those ladies signed up for. Given that this guy ran strip clubs in his casinos, there's no reason why this should come as a shocker.
Even if all the accusations were true (and most definitely they are not) one often supports not the individual, but the positions they uphold. Roy Moore was clearly the superior candidate due to his positions for many people. Saying "supporting Roy Moore isn't consistent with Christianity" is a really close-minded way to look at the situation.
So, It's okay to visit a relative at their house. And they could grab your genital. And body parts. Since it's their property.
So, It's okay to visit a relative at their house. And they could grab your genital. And body parts. Since it's their property.
But in Roy Moore's case (and in Donald Trump's), his past WAS supposed to matter, even though the charges were never proven.
And, in addition, I wouldn't think that every misdeed in anyone's past should count equally.
Sexual abuse of children is not a partisan issue. Any decent human being should stand against it.
Sexual abuse of children is not a partisan issue.
We have a criminal justice system to deal with that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?