How Can Molecules Think?

[Qubit]

Stone with Seven Eyes = Nitrogen Base...

666 = Carbon.
777 = Nitrogen.

Jesus represents the Word (Nucleobase) made flesh...

Nucleobases form proteins (flesh)...

John 1:14
"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

One day, a new Engraving (Genetic Sequence) will be written on the Stone with Seven Eyes (Nitrogen Base). This will remove sin from our Genomes...

Zechariah 3:9
"For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the LORD of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day."

The enmity that happened in the Garden of Eden will finally be reversed...

 

[Kylie]

Molecules don't think.

It's the INTERACTION between many molecules that does it.

 

[FredVB]

It is just that cerebral activity depends on interaction of small parts that are themselves complex structures, with neural network enabling that. Molecules thinking would depend on such structures within them. But they are necessary parts of the structures used for the cerebral activity, so there is no thinking that needs to be from those molecules. Animism is the belief that other objects (so molecules being then included) experience things with thoughts involved on that, while we do not have evidential basis for supporting that, while it is known other creatures are sentient.

 

[FredVB]

Stone with Seven Eyes = Nitrogen Base...

View attachment 346651​

666 = Carbon.
777 = Nitrogen.

Jesus represents the Word (Nucleobase) made flesh...

View attachment 346652​

Nucleobases form proteins (flesh)...

John 1:14
"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

One day, a new Engraving (Genetic Sequence) will be written on the Stone with Seven Eyes (Nitrogen Base). This will remove sin from our Genomes...

Zechariah 3:9
"For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the LORD of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day."

The enmity that happened in the Garden of Eden will finally be reversed...

View attachment 346653​

The numbers 666 and 777 named in the Bible do have symbolic meaning along with showing what would be real things, but that does not free us to push further meaning from them that diminishes or eliminates what was there. Jesus does not represent something else, what there is shown would include what will represent Jesus, which so much in the Bible is about. The Word made flesh which the dwelt among us is Jesus, as was certainly shown, showing that the Word was incarnate, being that Logos shown to start with which is translated as the Word, that was with God and is God, and fully involved with all the creation to start with.

Sin will be removed from among those with repentance who come to restoration through the atonement God is making available, it would not be for all who otherwise do not come to that. Those of creation groaning for the hope of this restoration with the redeemed will see it.

 

[dlamberth]

Molecules don't think.

It's the INTERACTION between many molecules that does it.

I've heard some say that is a type of very low level consciousness.

 

[Astrid]

The numbers 666 and 777 named in the Bible do have symbolic meaning along with showing what would be real things, but that does not free us to push further meaning from them that diminishes or eliminates what was there. Jesus does not represent something else, what there is shown would include what will represent Jesus, which so much in the Bible is about. The Word made flesh which the dwelt among us is Jesus, as was certainly shown, showing that the Word was incarnate, being that Logos shown to start with which is translated as the Word, that was with God and is God, and fully involved with all the creation to start with.

Sin will be removed from among those with repentance who come to restoration through the atonement God is making available, it would not be for all who otherwise do not come to that. Those of creation groaning for the hope of this restoration with the redeemed will see it.

Is there something supposed to be inherently wrong with the number "666"?

 

[Astrid]

I've heard some say that is a type of very low level consciousness.

Id sure need a good definition, and, some data.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

Is there something supposed to be inherently wrong with the number "666"?

On its own? No.

But if it's combined with a specific set of other biblical contexts, then yes.

 

[The Barbarian]

And no doubt the soul tucks away into the lungs or maybe the liver during a transplant and waits for its new home.

Or maybe the new heart comes with a soul. Once imagination is allowed, anything goes.

 

[Kylie]

I've heard some say that is a type of very low level consciousness.

I'd definitely need some evidence to back up that claim.

 

[Astrid]

I'd definitely need some evidence to back up that claim.

There's nothing that "some" won't say.

 

[Neogaia777]

Maybe we are not even conscious?

I guess it all depends on where you want to draw that line, etc.

Do we determine at what level a thing is, and/or becomes, quote/unquote "conscious"? Or are there even "levels" to it, etc? Do we truly think for ourselves? Because if this universe operates deterministically, or by the rules and laws of determinism, it might suggest otherwise, etc.

And since you all don't like the word "God", what if this universe itself is "conscious", and has a "consciousness"? And we, and everything else in it, are just pieces and parts of that? But it is only the universe itself that decides, or has already decided, and we are each only parts of that, or are only players in that, fulfilling our role in that, etc? But that nothing ever can go against the will of this universes predetermined/foreordained will, and/or consciousness, etc. Because if determinism is true, it can only ever go one way, etc. And that would be the way that the universe willed it, from the very beginning, etc.

"What if", huh?

God Bless.

 

[dlamberth]

There's nothing that "some" won't say.

From what I've seen, it depends on the depth of a person's own inner experience of deep consciousness. So what IS consciousness? Is anthropocentric consciousness the baseline for consciousness? Is that the boundary of consciousness expression? As some do say, when it comes to existence, I'm having trouble finding limits to the reach and variety of the types of consciousness with in the scope of the Universe. But also I'm one who sees the potential of infinite variety with in the Universe, which includes consciousness.

 

[Astrid]

From what I've seen, it depends on the depth of a person's own inner experience of deep consciousness. So what IS consciousness? Is anthropocentric consciousness the baseline for consciousness? Is that the boundary of consciousness expression? As some do say, when it comes to existence, I'm having trouble finding limits to the reach and variety of the types of consciousness with in the scope of the Universe. But also I'm one who sees the potential of infinite variety with in the Universe, which includes consciousness.

Ok

 

[FredVB]

Maybe we are not even conscious?

I guess it all depends on where you want to draw that line, etc.

Do we determine at what level a thing is, and/or becomes, quote/unquote "conscious"? Or are there even "levels" to it, etc? Do we truly think for ourselves? Because if this universe operates deterministically, or by the rules and laws of determinism, it might suggest otherwise, etc.

And since you all don't like the word "God", what if this universe itself is "conscious", and has a "consciousness"? And we, and everything else in it, are just pieces and parts of that? But it is only the universe itself that decides, or has already decided, and we are each only parts of that, or are only players in that, fulfilling our role in that, etc? But that nothing ever can go against the will of this universes predetermined/foreordained will, and/or consciousness, etc. Because if determinism is true, it can only ever go one way, etc. And that would be the way that the universe willed it, from the very beginning, etc.

"What if", huh?

God Bless.

I've had some suspicion that there are some who are NPC. This idea is nothing to act on though in any way. The right way to act is doing as wanting how things would be done for self or to self, this is my own wording for it. I know a great deepness to my own self, this consciousness is real, with which I act with significant awareness to what is around and what things are significant enough to know. The right way is with assuming this is in others, while sometimes there is evidence of the same in others, while not every time.

 

[Astrid]

From what I've seen, it depends on the depth of a person's own inner experience of deep consciousness. So what IS consciousness? Is anthropocentric consciousness the baseline for consciousness? Is that the boundary of consciousness expression? As some do say, when it comes to existence, I'm having trouble finding limits to the reach and variety of the types of consciousness with in the scope of the Universe. But also I'm one who sees the potential of infinite variety with in the Universe, which includes consciousness.

I don’t spend time on life’s persistent questions.

When I want to “ drill down” it’s on a topic that
has some chance of getting results.

 

[The Barbarian]

When I want to “ drill down” it’s on a topic that
has some chance of getting results.

If you're not an engineer, you should have been.

 

[Astrid]

If you're not an engineer, you should have been.

Definitely not suited to philosopher, or theologian.

 

[partinobodycular]

I've had some suspicion that there are some who are NPC.

My suspicion is that you're all NPCs.