How can Creationism be falsified?

[Loudmouth]

I just LOVE this. It is so convenient for evolution not to have to prove anything and yet call it a fact.

Evolution has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

 

[W2L]

Evolution has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

When i look at creation, Gods existence is proven beyond all doubt. Of course im no scientist, but i observe the miracle of creation and see God our father

 

[Loudmouth]

how do you know what gene pathways exist in Ichthyosaurs? if you dont know (and we dont know) then we cant conclude that his traits was analogous to the dolphin one.

Which traits are we talking about? Be specific.

so those are anologous structures?:

Darwin's God: A Salamander Two-fer: Non Homologous Development and an ORFan

They are homologous. They develop from the same tissues and from the same genetic pathways. Just because some pathways are turned on before others does not make them different pathways.

 

[Loudmouth]

When i look at creation, Gods existence is proven beyond all doubt. Of course im no scientist, but i observe the miracle of creation and see God our father

What evidence proves it to you?

 

[Loudmouth]

when you observe a creature that evolve into another creature from another family? (cat into a dog for instance).

That would disprove evolution. If evolution is true, a living species should not evolve into another living species. The descendants of cats will always be cats, just more diverse and varied cats.

Humans evolved from primates. We are still primates. Humans evolved from mammals. We are still mammals. Humans evolved from vertebrates. We are still vertebrates. With evolution, you never leave the branch you are a part of.

 

[Loudmouth]

fossils cant prove evolution. neither genetics.

Find sand. Push head firmly into sand.

 

[xianghua]

With evolution, you never leave the branch you are a part of.

so mammales are still reptiles?

 

[W2L]

What evidence proves it to you?

In my opinion, The complexities of creation are so vast that only God can create it. All creation seems impossible without a creator. Not only did man miraculously grow heart, lungs and the other organs, but both male and female evolved at the same time as well? Its too incredible to be without God the creator.

 

[xianghua]

Which traits are we talking about? Be specific.

all of those shared traits:

Convergent evolution - Wikipedia

so you cant know if those are homologous or not according to your criteria.

 

[Loudmouth]

so mammales are still reptiles?

Both mammals and reptiles are amniotes:

The common ancestor of synapsids (our lineage) and diapsids (the lineage for living reptiles) would probably be labeled as a reptile by modern standards.

Part of the problem is the inherent conflict between cladistics and terms that have been carried over from Linnaean taxonomy. Cladistics uses monophyletic names while Linnaean taxonomy uses paraphyletic names, hence the incompatibility between the two.

 

[Skreeper]

In my opinion, The complexities of creation are so vast that only God can create it. All creation seems impossible without a creator. Not only did man miraculously grow heart, lungs and the other organs, but both male and female evolved at the same time as well? Its too incredible to be without God the creator.

That's a logical fallacy, namely an argument from ignorance/personal incredulity.

 

[Loudmouth]

all of those shared traits:

Convergent evolution - Wikipedia

so you cant know if those are homologous or not according to your criteria.

Why can't I know if those are homologous or not?

 

[Loudmouth]

In my opinion, The complexities of creation are so vast that only God can create it.

That would be personal incredulity, not evidence.

Not only did man miraculously grow heart, lungs and the other organs, but both male and female evolved at the same time as well?

As already discussed, those things did not have to all evolve at once. There are species with no heart, but still have lungs and the other organs. We can find many species that lack one or more of the organs on those lists. We can also find hermaphroditic species where each individual is both male and female at the same time.

Its too incredible to be without God the creator.

That's not evidence.

 

[W2L]

That's a logical fallacy, namely an argument from ignorance/personal incredulity.

No, you misunderstand me. I can form a logical opinion based on what i see

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

so mammales are still reptiles?

This proves that you obviously and clearly do not know anything about evolution.

 

[W2L]

That's not evidence.

Its evidence for me.

 

[Loudmouth]

No, you misunderstand me. I can form a logical opinion based on what i see

Perhaps you can form a logical argument, but what you have offered thus far is a logical fallacy known as the argument from incredulity:
Your logical fallacy is personal incredulity

 

[Loudmouth]

Its evidence for me.

All that demonstrates is that you don't know what evidence is.

 

[Skreeper]

No, you misunderstand me. I can form a logical opinion based on what i see

Your inability to understand how the universe came into existence doesn't affect other peoples ability to understand it.

 

[W2L]

Perhaps you can form a logical argument, but what you have offered thus far is a logical fallacy known as the argument from incredulity:
Your logical fallacy is personal incredulity

Hes a personal friend, so yes God is personal. Its personal but not fallacy.