Well said. My atheist shirt tails were definitely peeking out from under the sweater of my epistemic reasoning thereCould they "equally" say? No, Athée, I really don't think so (and excuse me while I step on Loftus' big left toe.) How would those other adherents be epistemically "equal" given the contextual parameters/considerations I mentioned to Mountain Girl?
Sure, we can say that Christian faith has a certain epistemic angle, as do the other religions in each of their own respective ways, but we should refrain from insinuating (from the outside looking in) that all of the religions are really just playing something along the line of the same sort of epistemic game. Given all of the historical, linguistic, cultural, perceptual and conceptual indices involved, we need to be observant of the full contexts into which each religion exists, and has existed, so as to avoid sinking into a quicksand of epistemic equivocation. An orange is not an apple; an apple is not a pear; a pear is not a strawberry--but sure, they are all fruit! And it is understandable that for someone who has a taste for toast (the foundation for butter), none of the fruit will likely seem to be a satisfying option at the moment.
Christianity is epistemically possible, but only partially so. The human mind can start with the religious texts, experiences, and interaction with other religious minds, but God has to come into the play at some point and lead the interlocuter to the final destination of faith. It's not just brain work, although it can start with that.
Upvote
0