Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm with you I hold a lot of veiws lightly and a few a little more so.. but these peterists (sp?) views are only fulfilled in part because It is his word and his prophesy/ breath/ the WORD is alive and so it was! in part and it IT IS being, the I am IS NOW .. these then are double witnesses to the fact" it will be" also and in full that time.I really am skeptical on Constatine as well. So, this is another reason why I am not big on a pure historicist version.
In general, on most things of Revelation, I am "I do not know".
I want to know, but I need evidence. I hold a lot of theories, but the evidence seems weak.
I'm with you I hold a lot of veiws lightly and a few a little more so.. but these peterists (sp?) views are only fulfilled in part because It is his word and his prophesy/ breath/ the WORD is alive and so it was! in part and it IT IS being, the I am IS NOW .. these then are double witnesses to the fact" it will be" also and in full that time.
the woman clothed with the sun.. it will have three fulfillment's because it his , his words his picture his revealing.. .. and he is alive/life , his words alive and his words are life.
Hitler and Stalin are prophesied. Hitler was the antichrist, and Stalin/Moscow are the great harlot who sits on 7 hills and many waters (5 seas).It is, just check out wiki on some of the main symbols of Revelation. I remember Hank Hanagraff finally disclosing himself as historicist. There is strong evidence in Revelation of some sort of historicist view. I am unpersuaded myself, as there is a difference between *conclusive* evidence and strong evidence.
Also, as I noted, Catholicism, is, of course, very big and while I disagree with a lot of their viewpoints, they do have a number of the historicist viewpoints... and with some good reason.
But, I tend to view, instead, the events of the past as likely related to something happening in the future.
I think, besides, for instance the major failings of Christian majority states: the inquisition, colonialism, neo-colonialism, the mess the US has been making in Muslim lands, and so on... this, though, remains a problem for me.
My view is more that these nations want to seduce Christians with the idea that they are with them, but their actions seem to show they are against them.
I have to say God surely was behind some of these behaviors, however, even if they were savage. God is known to work with where people are and with even their savage tendencies. Otherwise, how would we as human beings have any converse with God at all?
I am not at all so sure about fulfillment of the last seven plagues being as you say. Cancer has been around but only recently identified as such, for instance. You see really horrendous plagues in the Middle Ages. And then in the last century you saw really incredible evil in Hitler and Stalin, as well as across the world (Hoover, Pol Pot, Mao, and so on).
Hitler and Stalin are prophesied. Hitler was the antichrist, and Stalin/Moscow are the great harlot who sits on 7 hills and many waters (5 seas).
Besides the plagues of skin cancer, red tides, and global warming, the Euphrates was dry on 9/11, and we are now dropping 100 pound "hailstones" on the 7th head of the beast.
A thought, Midst...
Read all sixteen chapters of Romans [KJV] a minimum of twenty-five through without attempting to understand any of it. Likewise with Ephesians.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?