- Jun 11, 2005
- 41,637
- 16,728
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
At the moment we are struggling to maintain the personnel commitments we have, and National Guardsmen and Reservists are serving far more tours of duty than they should be. And, with the "back door draft" people who decide not to reenlist are pulled back in involuntarily because of the time they need to spend in the Individual Ready Reserves.
The Army has rules and the Army has consequences. If gay people want to serve and are physically and mentally capable, who cares what their orientation is? If their behavior violates Army rules, they should suffer consequences, just as heterosexual soldiers should if they violate rules.
What's the big deal?
We just saw several thousand National Guardsmen in our state leave for Iraq, many for the second time. I would bet hands down that if you asked them if they would be OK with gay soldiers if it meant they'd get home a month sooner or be able to stay home a month longer, the overwhelming majority would say yes.
The Army has rules and the Army has consequences. If gay people want to serve and are physically and mentally capable, who cares what their orientation is? If their behavior violates Army rules, they should suffer consequences, just as heterosexual soldiers should if they violate rules.
What's the big deal?
We just saw several thousand National Guardsmen in our state leave for Iraq, many for the second time. I would bet hands down that if you asked them if they would be OK with gay soldiers if it meant they'd get home a month sooner or be able to stay home a month longer, the overwhelming majority would say yes.
Upvote
0