Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Like I said...some have misinterpreted the Bible...4 legged birds. You loose.
We live in a weird world where people take texts to be the same as mathematic algorithms. I've really never understood it myself.I've never taken anything you say as a personal attack, which is one of the ways I know when I AM being attacked, because you and people like you, prove that it is possible to differ in opinion or conclusion without trying to make the other person feel bad.
You said earlier that when Christ spoke, it was "Deep Truth". Did the Pharisees understand Him at least half the time when He talked to them?A PERFECT text would compensate for any possible flaw in any possible reader
I've seen too much in my life that I can't explain any other way. The Bible sort of filled in the gaps for me in that regard.we agree on the term "paradox"
That one's debatable, it would seem.like most people's attempt to demonstrate biblically that homosexuality is sinful...
Hey - the language wasn't as categorical as our modern English is. That doesn't make a contradiction, but it does make a rather amusing little tid-bit to run into in an English translation.4 legged birds. You loose.
Insects don't have 4 legs, they have 6. So again, inacuracy or error, call it what you will.All other winged insects that have four legs are loathsome for you
OK. now lets call you an abomination for having a CF female charecter wearing pants.well if you don't like homosexuality being called sin lets call it what the bible calls it. An Abomination. Does this sound better?
Then you go right ahead if that will make you feel better..OK. now lets call you an abomination for having a CF female charecter wearing pants.
Or just MAYBE, we'd be better off not going out of our way looking for obscure justifications to call other people names for doing things that there isn't really anything wrong with.Then you go right ahead if that will make you feel better..
So if we live in Christ we put to death the deeds of the flesh.. As shown above.1It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery.
2Behold I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you.
3And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law.
4You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
5For we through the Spirit, by faith, are waiting for the hope of righteousness.
6For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but faith working through love.
7You were running well; who hindered you from obeying the truth?
8This persuasion did not come from Him who calls you.
9A little leaven leavens the whole lump of dough.
10I have confidence in you in the Lord that you will adopt no other view; but the one who is disturbing you will bear his judgment, whoever he is.
11But I, brethren, if I still preach circumcision, why am I still persecuted? Then the stumbling block of the cross has been abolished.
12I wish that those who are troubling you would even mutilate themselves.
13For you were called to freedom, brethren; only do not turn your freedom into an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.
14For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, "YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF."
15But if you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another.
16 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh.
17 For the flesh sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you please.
18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the Law.
19 Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality,
20 idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions,
21 envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
23gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.
24Now those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. 25If we live by the Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit.
I never called any one a name.. I called an act an abomination..God can change the heart of any man.. Through Christ any man can become a new creation.. Leaving behind the works of the flesh.. I cannot judge any man.. For it is Christ whom saves and not me.. I can though say the act of homosexuality is an abomination in the site of God.. For He says it is..I love the people. THey were also created in the image of God.. It is the act I hate. Not because of whom does them but because of the perverse way the enemy has trapped these people in.. Praying that God will set them free from this.Or just MAYBE, we'd be better off not going out of our way looking for obscure justifications to call other people names for doing things that there isn't really anything wrong with.
Good, so... um, whats that got to do with monogomous, consentual, supportive homosexual relationships?So if we live in Christ we put to death the deeds of the flesh.. As shown above.
you keep saying this, but you are unable to explain how you come to this conclusion.For He says it is
The same word used to describe "abomination" was used for the dietary laws and even the best scholars will admit that it falls under the purity code in that chapter, which we do not follow.MORAL LAWS from the Torah continue to stand today. The other laws you quote there are from the civil & ceremonial laws of the Torah - there are 3 sections of the law/categories if you will.
Worship/religious/sacrificial, & civil laws (govt. civil society laws) & Moral.
Moral law was law before the OT Torah was written. Murder by Cain was SIN before the law came. So was all the sin of the people of Sodom & Gomorrah & in Noah's days before the flood (God judged them on their immorality).
So those STAND today. So when Paul "rants" against homosexuality, he's REITERATING THE MORAL LAWS of the OT that are still in effect.
As are the lists of other moral laws. But you don't see the Sacrifical laws *incl. Sabbath observance* or any of the CIVIL laws they followed that day (on farming, animal treatment, etc.).
Nadiine said:He WAS speaking agaisnt homosexality. Romans 1:18-32 cannot be any clearer than it is in its direct definition & detail of a man with man & woman with woman "exchanging the NATURAL function" & use.
JESUS Himself defined lawful marriage in God's eyes:
Mat 19:4-6 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female,
And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and the two shall be one flesh?
Gen 2:23-24 And Adam said, This [is] now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Notice there's NO room given for man and man? Woman with woman? No HE and HE? No She and her?
JESUS defined lawful sexual unions, Paul merely reiterated the standard.
Always remember, HOMOSEXUALITY WAS NOT AN ISSUE OF THEIR DAY in Israel! Homosexuality was NOT a typical lifestyle and it wasn't hotly contested as it is today here.
The upshot is, homosexuality IS SINFUL - it's unlawful union in the eyes of GOD because God made the prototype at the beginning of creation: male and female, (and HE SAYS) FOR that very reason, they are to become one union. Not 2 men, not 2 women.
By the way, maybe you can show me in the Bible where all the many Gay examples of Christians & OT saints that were GAY who led the people??? If it was SO lawful & common, there will SURELY be many Godly gay examples
of elders, shepherds, priests, prophets & teachers in our bible that display God's pleasure with homosexuality.
I'll wait for your verse examples for us.
While you are waiting...could you show me where in scripture is says that everything must be layed out in scripture...or that the scriptures are the only authority???I'm still waiting for the verses of a same sex, loving monogamous relationship condemned by Jesus or any of the other Apostles. I am waiting for an example of homosexuality without:
a)pagan worship
b) rape (Sodom and Gomorrah)
c)unbiased translations, 1 Corinthians is the weakest argument since the translation of "homosexual offender" is not what the word really means. It was said to be meant "masturbation" by the early church Fathers, and the best of scholars don't even know what it means. (arsenkoitas)
d) Where does Jesus talk about homosexuality? clearly it wasn't an issue back then, as it wasn't recognized till the 19th century
e) a solution to gay freedom besides "reparative therapy" which is condemend by EVERY SINGLE credible mental health foundation in America, whcih causes suicide rates to increase hugely. Ask that same thing about alcoholism, and you will get another answer. It is clear. it is irreversible.
f) Where does Paul talk about homosexual attraction and not just lust? There is a distinction.
g) Where does Paul talk about people being born gay, and that innate attraction that even Exodus International talks about?
h) Where does the Bible say what marriage "isn't"?
It doesn't say "man cannot join with man in marriage", they had no need for that as they didn't even know about loving relationships then.
Everything must be laid out in Scripture...except for things like pornography, which was not around at the time.While you are waiting...could you show me where in scripture is says that everything must be layed out in scripture...or that the scriptures are the only authority???
Nevermind...that is another thread.
Because I don't think a loving and benign God would deliberately set people up to fail by making it so that the ONLY way they can experience the fundamental human condition of romantic love, the ONLY way they can have the mutual caring, supporting relationship you get from being in a partnership, would be worthy of damnation.Why do you think it isn't?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?