• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

ScottBot

Revolutionary
May 2, 2005
50,468
1,441
58
a state of desperation
✟57,712.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
In case you didn't get the memo, when a man has sex with another man, that is an act of homosexuality, regardless of the reasoning behind it.
 
Upvote 0

SuddenlyISee

Active Member
Dec 29, 2006
387
40
45
Buffalo, baby!
✟23,260.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
In case you didn't get the memo, when a man has sex with another man, that is an act of homosexuality, regardless of the reasoning behind it.

LOL. True. But, perhaps the issue was the rape and not the homosexuality? Is there not room in this story for that to be possible?
 
Upvote 0

SoldierKG

Regular Member
Nov 18, 2006
107
5
Visit site
✟22,779.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
When your attracted to a woman are you lusting her? Or are you just attracted? Can't the same go for a homosexual? I am not saying that God causes it. God does not make someone a homosexual. God creates the life, but the product of man and woman (child) is sinful. Not because God made it that way, because it was inherited from it's parents.
 
Upvote 0

ScottBot

Revolutionary
May 2, 2005
50,468
1,441
58
a state of desperation
✟57,712.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
LOL. True. But, perhaps the issue was the rape and not the homosexuality? Is there not room in this story for that to be possible?
The problem is that the men were OFFERED girls by Lot, his own virgin daughters, and the men did not want them, they wanted the men who were visiting Lot.
 
Upvote 0

SuddenlyISee

Active Member
Dec 29, 2006
387
40
45
Buffalo, baby!
✟23,260.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The problem is that the men were OFFERED girls by Lot, his own virgin daughters, and the men did not want them, they wanted the men who were visiting Lot.

Which scholars believe is because they wanted to show superiority over the outsiders which would specifically negate their desire to rape Lots daughters.

Still others say that they didn't want to have any kind of sexual anything with them based on the original text.

The only thing whe know for sure is that God has two chances to say it is because every single man in the entire city, save Lot, was gay but it is never said. Why? Why would God dance around it if the reason was that simple? Could you make the slightest bit of room for the possibility that God didn't say that was why because it wasn't why? Probably not- but I wouldn't expect you to make such a concession anyway.

The reasoning is specifically mentioned by God twice but homosexuality is not mentioned by God once. That is all I am saying.
 
Upvote 0

yodafett

Blissfully wed to tierajade
Oct 12, 2006
6,095
952
48
✟38,403.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Roman's 1:27
and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.

I don't speek ancient greek first hand, but according to Strong's, greek words used for "men" through the whole verse are

αρρσην and αρσην
male (as stronger for lifting): - male, man.

and the word used for lust was
orexis
excitement of the mind, that is, longing after: - lust.

And the word for another
ἀλλήλων
one another. : - each other, mutual, one another, (the other), (them-, your-) selves, (selves) together

Males longing after other males. How can that be misunderstood?
 
Upvote 0

SoldierKG

Regular Member
Nov 18, 2006
107
5
Visit site
✟22,779.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
A sodomite is commonyly defined as one who commences in unnacceptable sexual behavior.. God destroyed Sodom for their sexual sin. Their sins of deciet. Look at Las Vegas and it's like looking Sodom in the face. My point is, contrary to what many believe, Homosexuals are not sinners for being homosexual. Only if they commit an act of sodomy, are they guilty of the sin mentioned in the Bible. Many homosexuals are turned off to Christ because people are hateful. I know many a person dealing with homosexuality and they DO NOT WANT to be that way, however if your attracted to something than you just are. These people know however that they must not indulge their feelings, no matter how painful. What they need is support, and who better to give it to them then Christians.We are the body of christ, and Christ is loving. If we know a gay person we should not be afraid or be mean or condemn, we should embrace them with open arms, and let them know that we love them. If Christ is love, and we represent Christ and we condemn them while representing Christ, than to them it is the same as christ condeming them. We are giving Christ a bad image, and I say no more shall we do this. We are to loveour neighbor whether he likes men or women. Just because cause we love them does not mean we support their imperfections, we help them to overcome their imperfections.

"Lord Lord we wish to be like you, and to know you, and seek your power."

"Do you love me?"

"Yes Lord we love you."

"are you sure you love me?"

"Of course Lord we would follow you to the grave. We love you so much."

"If you love me, than prove it."

God wants us to love others so let's do it. If everyone who read/posted in this thread showed the love of Christ in their commmunity and their community showed the love to their cities, we could have a Christ centered world of love within months. Bad things happen when Good men stay silent.
 
Upvote 0

SuddenlyISee

Active Member
Dec 29, 2006
387
40
45
Buffalo, baby!
✟23,260.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

Romans chapter 10 ends after verse 21.

Putting that to the side, though, I don't see how that can be mistranslated. I am only speaking on S&G. If you are talking about the law, that is another conversation. Before I could embark on that conversation, I would need to be able to look up the verse in question.
 
Upvote 0

SuddenlyISee

Active Member
Dec 29, 2006
387
40
45
Buffalo, baby!
✟23,260.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

Good post. One question, though... Can you please give me the verse in which God says that Sodom was destroyed because of sexual sin?
 
Upvote 0

yodafett

Blissfully wed to tierajade
Oct 12, 2006
6,095
952
48
✟38,403.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I agree with this 100%
 
Upvote 0

SoldierKG

Regular Member
Nov 18, 2006
107
5
Visit site
✟22,779.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Good post. One question, though... Can you please give me the verse in which God says that Sodom was destroyed because of sexual sin?
I dont' know where it is,I'll have found it by tomorrow though....hmmm....it's not where the origional story is...
 
Upvote 0

SuddenlyISee

Active Member
Dec 29, 2006
387
40
45
Buffalo, baby!
✟23,260.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I dont' know where it is,I'll have found it by tomorrow though....hmmm....it's not where the origional story is...

Jude 1:7

In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.

It appears to be a letter, though, and not God talking. When God spoke on Sodom, he didn't say anything about sexual perversion. There are a lot of sins the Sodomites could have been guilty of. Chances are, they were guilty of many of them. Sexual sin was added to the reason later and soon became the only reason. That seems to be mens motives, though, because when God spoke of Sodom he never said anything about sexual sin. Not that I can find anyway.
 
Upvote 0
Jan 12, 2004
49,784
860
✟54,471.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Having attraction toward the same gender and not acting upon it isn't necessarily wrong, but IS something that person should try to go to the Lord w/ if possible despite attraction itself not being wrong. A person that just has attractions toward the same gender but has nothing to do w/ that life isn't a homosexual...at least not in my book. A homosexual is someone that acts on those feelings, not actively resists them and such.
 
Upvote 0

savedfromdistruction

Regular Member
Dec 30, 2006
925
42
Texas
Visit site
✟16,370.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
There is no such thing as being a homodexual that does not practice the sin. All homosexuals are in sin. it is possible to stop being one and that is by repentance towards God and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Once that happens the person is no loner a homosexual.
1 Corinthians 6:11

All homosexuality is sin according to the bible. The term gay is a non term. Biblical anyone who is into homosexuality is in sin and scripture teaches that no one in sin will go to heaven.


 
Reactions: Joy
Upvote 0
W

WalkingforHim

Guest

That isn't what the Bible says.

Besides, even if that were the case, then why would Lot offer his daughters, instead of himself, if it homosexual relations they wanted?

If we know a gay person we should not be afraid or be mean or condemn, we should embrace them with open arms, and let them know that we love them.

Even if they go on to embrace their homosexuality and accept it.

In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.

Which could just as easily, and more likely, be rape than homosexuality.

There is no such thing as being a homodexual that does not practice the sin. All homosexuals are in sin.

This is ignorance. Homosexuality is not defined as the act of gay sex, but the existence of homoerotic sexual desires. One can be a homosexual a virgin at the same time, just as one is a hetero, but can be a virgin at the same time.

Redefining words to make your hatred more tolerable is a sure indication of such hatred.

it is possible to stop being one and that is by repentance towards God and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Once that happens the person is no loner a homosexua
 
Upvote 0

eastcoast_bsc

Veteran
Mar 29, 2005
19,296
10,782
Boston
✟394,552.00
Faith
Christian

According to your Thesis, one who has not engaged in heterosexual sex is not a heterosexual. Think about this reasoning. It would mean that all are asexual with lustful thoughts toward either the opposite or same sex. Look whether you like it or not, there is a segment of the population that during the onset of puberty, found out that no matter how hard they tried, they were attracted to members of the same sex. One can be in denial of this because it may threaten their world view. But the reality "Is what it is" One who is gay, did not make a abitrary decision that they where going to become attracted to same sex. It is usually a long process of struggle, denial and sometimes acceptance. I would suggest that until you walk in anothers shoes, you should refrain from making kneejerk pronouncements in regards to "who" they are.
 
Upvote 0