Mling said:The second paragraph here, along with the woman at the well, is why I said he would not have flipped out, even if it is, a sin.
the first point is good, but it needs to be pointed out that he sometimes, after he quoted Scripture, he didn't always uphold it. Like "you've heard it said 'eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth' but I tell you this, do not resist and evildoer..." turn the other cheek/walk the extra mile. Or "Moses allowed you to divorce because your hearts were hard, but I say, what God has put together, let no man set assunder." We can tell that he would have quoted Scripture, but where the conversation would have gone from there is anybody's guess.
For the record, I don't think he would have flipped out either. The eye for an eye statement wasn't in answer to a question, it was showing them a new way of looking at things. It was to get away from the vengence cuture as the OT also says Vengence is mine, says the Lord, I will repay. Eye for an eye was a legal sentence which was actually quite lenient for it's time.
Let's imagine someone coming up to Jesus saying "Look Jesus, I know scripture says we're not allowed to have sexual relations with the same gender, but what about if I just do it with one person?"
While I can imagine him responding with love and guidence, I just can't see him saying "Sure, go ahead".
Upvote
0