ifriit said:
Well, theres no such thing as gay orchids....lol.......there are some species, cateseums which have distinct male and female flowers seperated on different timing and flowers.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ifriit said:Actually, no, they don't always. Flowers don't go anywhere; they're plants. Birds, fish, and other animals, on the other hand, have a relatively proportional amount of homosexual activity as compares to human beings. You can observe homosexual activity with most species.
Fiendishjester said:identical twins are not exact, that's why they have different finger prints
Icystwolf said:Thats true, gene structures within our bodies don't stay constant. Our genes being compied through cell division, is like taking a photo copy of a book image. The more you copy, the less quality you'd get from the original print.
As for chemical imbalances in relation to gene structures. Some genes don't react unless a certain chemical makes it react. Genes for vital organs must always be active.
As for homosexuality, since no one is born gay, I would think that a certain chemical has reacted with a gene during puberty that makes them gay. Like bulling, or drug intake, allegies...whatever. Don't take my word for it, I'm not a science student.
But whatever it is, they were or would have been heterosexuals, so hence they can be heteros.
Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) of Topeka, KS. See: http://www.godhates****.com[/quote]
Please PM me that link or something, it's censored...pfft.
draper said:[/url]
Please PM me that link or something, it's censored...pfft.
Arikay said:Take a guess, it can mean a bundle of sticks or a Cigerette.
From that site, their "manifesto":
"We are a TULIP Baptist Church!
We believe -- and vigorously preach -- the 5 Points of Calvinism!
Anyone preaching otherwise is a Hell-bound false prophet, a messenger of Satan, to whom we say, Anathema Maranatha! and, Let him be accursed of God!
To every lover of Arminian lies -- believing and preaching that God loves every individual of mankind -- we say, You are going to Hell! Period! End of discussion! God's decree sending you to Hell is irreversible! Hypocrites! How can ye escape the damnation of Hell?!"
(Yes I purposly put the quote in purple,)
welcome to learning how Not to be a christian.
At first I thought It was a parody site, and looked around and it seems to be real.
draper said:umm, i tried the C and D words, help...lol.
Just how many of these people do you think there are?Icystwolf said:Bending the ideas again. Oh boy here we go again. A person who was practising homosexuality for 10yrs with a partner...then degaied. Now has a family with his own genes, and a wife.
I suppose no one is born 7lb 15oz because there's no single gene that codes for body weight either.Thanks for telling us that, which therefore proves that no one is born gay.
Large-scale brain development, and chemical alterations thereof, begins in the womb and continues through early childhood. The onset of puberty is of precisely zero assistance in understanding when a particular development occurred.Chemical levels of the attraction of sex happen during puberty. So they become gay when they're in their teens.
When I say "gene sequences," I'm talking about the presence of multiple genes that cause some phenotypic change. Polygenetic traits, if you will.And also, becareful with gene sequences....actually I find this a bit humerous. It's not the sequence of the gene that makes the differnce of each human being, but it's whats contained in the gene that makes the differences.
Well, really only a handful of our genes differ from a chimp's in function and location.Technically, our genes are different to a chimpanzee's genes by the matter of sequence and slightly on information within it.
Can I ask you to stop assuming your conclusion? It's an annoying and fruitless activity.Upon that theres no such thing as being born gay,
I have obviously missed where you have "proven" anything.then yes, I believe the argument that homosexuals are really heterosexuals is proven by the point above.
Really, what is the point of this? Can you show me a married bachelor?Wrong interpertation. All rules can be changed, nothing is impossible to do.
draper said:[/url]
Please PM me that link or something, it's censored...pfft.
Arikay said:If you are "not a science student" then how can you say No one is born gay?
I've answered in the previous posts, of how much that degaid person knows. And I can't give you a number, again I see through that trap of yours, if I give you a number, you'd say I have no statistical proof backing my statistics. If I don't give you an answer, you'd say I have no idea and hence the other statistics are true.Philosoft said:Just how many of these people do you think there are?
That dosen't fit into any arguments of homosexuality, mainly because it's a chemical or genetic reaction that gives a distinctive characteristic of mental disability, of them to be unable to co-incide with a female.Philosoft said:I suppose no one is born 7lb 15oz because there's no single gene that codes for body weight either.
Gibberish Gibberish Gibberish, if you copied that from a website, give us the full report, not just part of it. Have no idea what you talking about there, I can see some relations to the arguments presented, but again have no idea unless I see the full picture.Philosoft said:Large-scale brain development, and chemical alterations thereof, begins in the womb and continues through early childhood. The onset of puberty is of precisely zero assistance in understanding when a particular development occurred.
And hence the homosexual genes and chemical influences is a genetic trait of self-destruction, and hence we should leave them as they are until all the gay genes of the gene pull are eventually wiped out?Philosoft said:When I say "gene sequences," I'm talking about the presence of multiple genes that cause some phenotypic change. Polygenetic traits, if you will.
Exactly, hence if people used genetics to prove homosexuality, then it's seriously BS. It's not just genes but also chemical reactions...but more importantly, no one is born gay.Philosoft said:Well, really only a handful of our genes differ from a chimp's in function and location.
Well, no because my conclusions are my opinions. And my opinion is that homosexuality is a choice. My justification is explained in these posts, and so far the challenges I've had in the previous arguments, where people argue whether it was right to change, whilst I was arguing that homosexuality is a choice. I've seen it happen and thats what I'm basing it on.Philosoft said:Can I ask you to stop assuming your conclusion? It's an annoying and fruitless activity.
Same can be said for you as well.Philosoft said:I have obviously missed where you have "proven" anything.
Bending the rules of understanding of what's unknown. Not definitions...Philosoft said:Really, what is the point of this? Can you show me a married bachelor?
Kyubi-no-Youko said:Arikay: lol, well, if we (meaning homosexuals) do all end up in Hell-at least we'll be together ^^ Like a club!
Ok...now...back to your regularly schedualed thread...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?