Hillary's Past

[JoshuaW]

actually none of that stuff has been discredited. it has been only been answered with things like 'i don't know' or 'i don't remember'. the clintons greased enough palms to ensure others wouldn't testify that's all. your naivity is amusing...

You are able to look back over years of criminal activity of the most destructive administration in American history, reserving your outrage for petty charges against the Clintons which even the right wing abandoned years ago. The focus of your determination is stunning.

 

[silentreader]

You are able to look back over years of criminal activity of the most destructive administration in American history, reserving your outrage for petty charges against the Clintons which even the right wing abandoned years ago. The focus of your determination is stunning.

they aren't petty charges. they are all serious crimes that would land someone in federal prison for quite awhile.

when you find something to charge Bush with feel free to levy it. so far it seems you can't and the evidence is against you.

 

[HumbleMan]

they aren't petty charges. they are all serious crimes that would land someone in federal prison for quite awhile.

when you find something to charge Bush with feel free to levy it. so far it seems you can't and the evidence is against you.

Which is why I've written my congresscritters and suggested a full investigation into Cheney's energy task force, the give aways to Halliburton, and the misuse of the intelligence community leading up to the invasion of Iraq.

Hillary is by no means innocent, or even remorseful, IMO, of alot of the things she's been accused of. But she did not play with American lives on the scale that Bush has done in the past seven years.

I think that if any of this stuff had any credibility, her opponents in the primary would be making good use of it, especially Edwards and Obama.

 

[silentreader]

Which is why I've written my congresscritters and suggested a full investigation into Cheney's energy task force, the give aways to Halliburton, and the misuse of the intelligence community leading up to the invasion of Iraq.

Hillary is by no means innocent, or even remorseful, IMO, of alot of the things she's been accused of. But she did not play with American lives on the scale that Bush has done in the past seven years.

I think that if any of this stuff had any credibility, her opponents in the primary would be making good use of it, especially Edwards and Obama.

actually it has credibility but it is old. and the dem hopefuls don't want to focus on hillary because they can all continue to bash bush. when bush bashing gets old some of this might come up but i doubt it. they have hillary voting for the war to start using.

 

[HumbleMan]

actually it has credibility but it is old. and the dem hopefuls don't want to focus on hillary because they can all continue to bash bush. when bush bashing gets old some of this might come up but i doubt it. they have hillary voting for the war to start using.

Funny, I hear the two front runners talk more about Hillary than I do about Bush. Especially during the debates.

 

[silentreader]

Funny, I hear the two front runners talk more about Hillary than I do about Bush. Especially during the debates.

i agree it is changing somewhat but if you played a drinking game and did a shot everytime a candidate mentioned Bush you would have alcohol poisoning.

 

[Billnew]

We're not going to let people paw through our past,
WE"RE THE PRESIDENT.

paraphrased.

We must wonder how many women Bill harrassed, molested, raped, that Hillary was able to silence?

Clintons past events in the White house is enough to
know I don't want her running things.

 

[HumbleMan]

paraphrased.

We must wonder how many women Bill harrassed, molested, raped, that Hillary was able to silence?

Clintons past events in the White house is enough to
know I don't want her running things.

That is a very serious accusation, and one I hope you thought about before you typed.

 

[JoshuaW]

when you find something to charge Bush with feel free to levy it. so far it seems you can't and the evidence is against you.

1 - violating his oath of office

2 - lying to Congress

3 - mobilizing the military using falsified justification

4 - violating the Geneva convention regarding torture

5 - using federal resources for purely political activities

6 - falsifying federal intelligence records

7 - revealing the name of a covert CIA operative

8 - misdirecting federal funds for personal profit

9 - interfering with federal voting records

10 - politicizing the Department of Justice

the evidence is against me? I'm just getting started. Let's see what you got on Kathleen Willey

 

[silentreader]

1 - violating his oath of office

2 - lying to Congress

3 - mobilizing the military using falsified justification

4 - violating the Geneva convention regarding torture

5 - using federal resources for purely political activities

6 - falsifying federal intelligence records

7 - revealing the name of a covert CIA operative

8 - misdirecting federal funds for personal profit

9 - interfering with federal voting records

10 - politicizing the Department of Justice

the evidence is against me? I'm just getting started. Let's see what you got on Kathleen Willey

i would love for you to prove one of those charges. with how much democrats hate Bush, if they could prove them they would have.

 

[MachZer0]

A boston fern would be a thousand times better than Dubya.

A boston fern is rather high up in the plant family.

In case you guys missed, Dubya isn't running

 

[MachZer0]

You are able to look back over years of criminal activity of the most destructive administration in American history, reserving your outrage for petty charges against the Clintons which even the right wing abandoned years ago. The focus of your determination is stunning.

We're trying to avoid a repeat of that administration by keeping the Clintons out of the Whitehouse.

 

[JoshuaW]

We're trying to avoid a repeat of that administration by keeping the Clintons out of the Whitehouse.

We've seen eight years example of your choice in governing. Thanks, but I'd take the Clintons back any day.

 

[MachZer0]

We've seen eight years example of your choice in governing. Thanks, but I'd take the Clintons back any day.

I'm sure the women who will most assuredly be accosted in the White House will disagree with you.

 

[JoyJuice]

I'm sure the women who will most assuredly be accosted in the White House will disagree with you.

Versus all those women losing fathers, husbands, and sons in a war of choice.

They will disagree with you as there is no comparison.

 

[MachZer0]

Versus all those women losing fathers, husbands, and sons in a war of choice.

They will disagree with you as there is no comparison.

Seems to me like there is another thread here that claimed liberals didn't base their decisions on emotion.

 

[Avatar]

In case you guys missed, Dubya isn't running

Which is why 95% of my post was about Clinton and Obama (in case you missed it).

 

[JoshuaW]

I'm sure the women who will most assuredly be accosted in the White House will disagree with you.

Name me one woman who was "accosted" in the Clinton White House?

 

[Conspiracy Theory]

In case you guys missed, Dubya isn't running

They're still running against Bush.

It's amusing, quite frankly.

I think they'll be stunned in the 2008 election when his name isn't even on the ballot.

 

[JoyJuice]

Seems to me like there is another thread here that claimed liberals didn't base their decisions on emotion.

Yeah that most be it, all those Iraq deaths both here and abroad with the millions of refugees are just unrational emotional reactions.