I did already explain that. But since you claim I didn't, post the precise part where you are referring to so there can be no confusion, and I will happily do so again.
As Hank has noted, I am willing to reply again.
Sure.
Throughout the statement, he refers to email servers and email domains. Email servers can host multiple domains, email domains can host multiple accounts. No info is given on what was actually hosted, just generalities about the server and domain.
In one paragraph, and one paragraph alone, he references a personal email account:
"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her
personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s
personal e-mail account."
[Bolding mine]
Note the continued references here to email domains - the point he is making is that use of her personal email account for non-classified matters included the details of her email domain and server. If recipients email accounts were hacked, they could see the sever used to operate her personal account
and all others.
This is further underlined by this statement:
"She also used her
personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States,
including sending and receiving
work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries."
[Bolding mine]
If her personal and work email accounts were one and the same, why would he note that work related emails were sent from her personal account on some occasions? If they were the same, it would be on all occasions - so why did he draw a distinction?