Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your time would be better spent trying to bring the woke extremists on the left back to reality, such as the ones holding rallies to support what Hamas did in Israel. But I don’t want to get off topic either
Nonresponsive to my statement, which was that Hillary is bitter and still angry that she lost the election, so she is projecting her bitterness onto others. That's what is relevant here.
One is indeed entitled to use legal means to challenge an election. Remember Gore doing this in 2000?
Bitter...
She wasn’t elected because I’d the EC but she did get more votes than Trump. Likable or not, more voters wanted her in the office.
Is she? Ive heard quite a few interviews over the years and shes generally pretty warm with a sense of humor.
Quoting Hillary has been done numerous times, but if you still are incapable of processing them, here you go again, with links:
freebeacon.com
Which has nothing to do with the topic.Quoting Hillary has been done numerous times, but if you still are incapable of processing them, here you go again, with links:
Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear.
“There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level,” Clinton said during an interview for the latest episode of The Atlantic’s politics podcast, The Ticket. “We still don’t know what really happened.”
“There’s just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover,” the Democratic Party’s 2016 presidential nominee continued. “But you don’t win by 3 million votes and have all this other shenanigans and stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, ‘Whoa, something’s not right here.’ That was a deep sense of unease.”
Clinton also offered copious criticism of President Trump, saying she warned the country about her former rival, and “it was even worse than I thought it was.”
“I really did feel sometimes like the tree falling in the forest. I believed he was a puppet of Putin. I believed that there was relevant, important information in his tax returns. I believed he did not have the temperament to be president, he was unfit—not a partisan comment, but an assessment of him,” the former secretary of state said."
Bitter, bitter, bitter. This article was 2020, but sure, she's still doing it.
August 2023:
"Hillary Clinton appeared on MSNBC with Rachel Maddow on Monday, where the two discussed how "bad actors" who say "every election is stolen ... wounds us as a democracy."
"I think, you know, the truth matters," Clinton said.
The failed presidential candidate's show of concern about the questioning of election outcomes marks a departure from her past remarks about Republican electoral victories.
A Washington Free Beacon review of the historical record reveals Clinton and other prominent Democrats have questioned the legitimacy of nearly every significant Republican win in the past two decades.
"If she had a fair election, she already would have won," Clinton said in 2018 after Democrat Stacey Abrams lost the Georgia gubernatorial race to Republican Brian Kemp.
After her 2016 loss to Donald Trump in the presidential election, Clinton repeatedly called Trump an "illegitimate president."
Democrats' questioning of elections goes as far back as the 2000 presidential election, which Clinton, along with Joe Biden and Terry McAuliffe, painted as stolen by the Supreme Court.
FLASHBACK: When Democrats Were Cool With Calling Elections 'Stolen'
Hillary Clinton appeared on MSNBC with Rachel Maddow on Monday, where the two discussed how "bad actors" who say "every election is stolen ... wounds us as a democracy."
It's a pretty commonly understood acknowledgement: and it is not sexism.
Which has nothing to do with the topic.It's a pretty commonly understood acknowledgement: and it is not sexism.
Hillary's unlikability
I Despise Hillary Clinton, And It Has Nothing To Do With Her Gender
Labeling all of "us" a sexist mob like our beef with Hillary has to do more with her being a woman than our general fears about another moderate, left of center, establishment democrat in office isn't just unfair, it's a blinders-on-generalization to defend a flawed candidate.www.huffpost.com
Nope. You would have had to miss all the other articles on just this topic to understand how widespread this acknowledgement is, back when Clinton was railroading Bernie Sanders, who should have been the candidate (and may have actually beaten Trump).
Did you even read those?It's a pretty commonly understood acknowledgement: and it is not sexism.
Hillary's unlikability
I Despise Hillary Clinton, And It Has Nothing To Do With Her Gender
Labeling all of "us" a sexist mob like our beef with Hillary has to do more with her being a woman than our general fears about another moderate, left of center, establishment democrat in office isn't just unfair, it's a blinders-on-generalization to defend a flawed candidate.
I was asked how she was projecting her bitterness, and I provided a lot of linked material. I also responded to subsequent comments.
Indeed. Today a number of politicians refuse to concede, graciously or ungraciously. Hillary Clinton conceded to the very man who she now is reaching out to get his 'supporters' intervention to help escape from his control.
