Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Trump wanted to prosecute Hillary Clinton and James Comey – report
White House counsel Don McGahn wrote a memo to dissuade Trump, noting that potential consequences could include impeachmentwww.theguardian.com
I have asked you four times now where in the speech he said this. For some reason, you don't want to say or know, evidently.I quoted him and I didn’t make any claims about where in the speech he said this.
Why not find out? It's not going to bite you, so what are you afraid of? It is so simple - you have the link, you have the words...why not satisfy your intellectual curiosity?I don’t care where in the speech he said it, I just claimed that he did say it. Which he did.
It claims he wanted to. What steps did he actually take? Did he “try to lock her up?” or was this just another stupid thing that he said?Trump wanted to prosecute Hillary Clinton and James Comey – report
White House counsel Don McGahn wrote a memo to dissuade Trump, noting that potential consequences could include impeachmentwww.theguardian.com
My article post-dates yours He said he wouldn't but then he tried to anyway on the down low.
Link to original report
You know, you could just read the article (linkie)....It claims he wanted to. What steps did he actually take? Did he “try to lock her up?” or was this just another stupid thing that he said?
And I have told you that I don’t care. If you want to post something about where in the speech he made these remarks then post it. I’m not going to do it for you.I have asked you four times now where in the speech he said this. For some reason, you don't want to say or know, evidently.
Why not find out? It's not going to bite you, so what are you afraid of? It is so simple - you have the link, you have the words...why not satisfy your intellectual curiosity?
From the article “It is unclear whether Mr. Trump read Mr. McGahn’s memo or whether he pursued the prosecutions further”You know, you could just read the article (linkie)....
President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
Trump said, "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." You have the transcript too, you can easily check for yourself
And yet how many posts like this have attempted to do so?This is all I have to say about this I don’t care to defend Trump.
One might think that this was an attempt to rile up the faithful that ran head first into reality hence the need for the various distractions to other GOP talking points, which to be fair also seem to be having issues with reality.Gosh, I could swear this thread was about Secretary Clinton observing that some of Donald's most ardent believers might warrant cult deprogramming and not January 6th.
"Our candidate failed to follow through with his campaign promises, vote for him again in 2024". Not convinced that's the best GOP campaign slogan, but let's see what the focus groups say.When did he try to lock her up?
Bingo!One might think that this was an attempt to rile up the faithful that ran head first into reality hence the need for the various distractions to other GOP talking points, which to be fair also seem to be having issues with reality.
You’re correct that we should focus on the topic, Hillary Clinton and how she feels that people who disagree with her should be reprogrammed"Our candidate failed to follow through with his campaign promises, vote for him again in 2024". Not convinced that's the best GOP campaign slogan, but let's see what the focus groups say.
I'll also note the complete lack of Ms. Clinton's attempts to deprogram anyone hasn't been brought up by posts attacking her, which I'm sure is because that's like totally different, you know, because reasons and such.
Honestly, why should anyone care about Hillary Clinton's opinions? What ability does she have to enact or influence policy anymore? She's not running for President and she doesn't hold any government office.You’re correct that we should focus on the topic, Hillary Clinton and how she feels that people who disagree with her should be reprogrammed
Hmmm, why would CNN be giving her air time?Honestly, why should anyone care about Hillary Clinton's opinions? What ability does she have to enact or influence policy anymore? She's not running for President and she doesn't hold any government office.
Because she says controversial things and gets people like you to click on their articles and watch their footage?Hmmm, why would CNN be giving her air time?
It didn’t work on me. I saw it on another network. They didn’t get any clicks from meBecause she says controversial things and gets people like you to click on their articles and watch their footage?
Ok. Still doesn't answer the question of why anyone should care about her opinions when she has no power (and no potential to gain the power) to enact them.It didn’t work on me. I saw it on another network. They didn’t get any clicks from me
So we shouldn’t care what anyone says unless they are in a position of power?Ok. Still doesn't answer the question of why anyone should care about her opinions when she has no power (and no potential to gain the power) to enact them.
She's actually projecting her own needs. She still claims her election that she lost to Trump was "stolen", almost 8 years later.Tell you what....if she drafts a law requiring this, I'll join you in objecting to it.
Until then, this seems just a tongue in cheek comment, nothing more. She's entitled to her opinion, just like everyone else...why make more of it than that?
-- A2SG, believe me, I've heard MAGA people say worse things about her and democrats in general.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?