Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can we get back on topic please?Democrats didn't raise the motion to vacate the Speaker. Gaetz did that all by himself.
Why would they want to keep him? He has refused to work with them in the past, why would they want that to continue?
Yeah, it's bizarre to think politicians would vote for someone who refuses to work with them, or even listen to them.
-- A2SG, chump don't want no help, chump don't get no help...
Just responding to your comments.Can we get back on topic please?
Not a lot. I was just answering your question. It's bad manners to ask a question and then complain when it's answered...What does that have to do with the OP?
I'm just annoyed I let myself get sucked into a derail.Not a lot. I was just answering your question. It's bad manners to ask a question and then complain when it's answered...
So there is no such post. Thank youShe never proposed any such law, nor any law of any sort. But that hasn't stopped some from clutching their pearls and acting as if she had. Look at the title of this very thread: "Hillary Clinton calls for "Formal Deprogramming" of Trump supporters"
She didn't "call for" any such thing. She specifically said: "Maybe there needs to be..." Not "I call for..."
-- A2SG, you did hear that part, right?
It shouldn't come as a surprise that it's being viewed more critically by those the comment was made against. In addition to all the other "dangerous cult members" rhetoric against them.Just responding to your comments.
But okay.....
What about Hilary's comment?
-- A2SG, and why are you guys taking it more seriously than any of us are?
Why?It shouldn't come as a surprise that it's being viewed more critically by those the comment was made against. In addition to all the other "dangerous cult members" rhetoric against them.
That’s not what I asked. Why can’t you just admit there never was such a post?I referenced the TITLE of the thread.
-- A2SG, and yeah, there is one of those.....
Wow the democrats aren't ever in any way responsible for anything whatsoever.
Removing the speaker because he wasn't radically conservative enough is also a pretty new thing.Is there much precedent for allowing the "not-in-power party" in the house to have the speaker role?
I'm not recalling any instances of that.
Another post with empty accusations instead of evidence. There's certainly a pattern forming. I imagine others see it too.No it's going on and on about the supposed motives of posters, rather than sticking to the topic.
Topic please.Another post with empty accusations instead of evidence. There's certainly a pattern forming. I imagine others see it too.
And they were, (they were starting to rally behind DeSantis), until the left basically made Trump a martyr in the eyes of many republicans, and now they're back to backing Trump again.
Discussing the lack of evidence for various posts in the thread seem to be on topic - unless those posts being responded to were off topic. Is that the claim?Topic please.
So do you agree or disagree with Cinton regarding formal deprogramming?Discussing the lack of evidence for various posts in the thread seem to be on topic - unless those posts being responded to were off topic. Is that the claim?
It was, until the actual quotes showed it to be quite different from what the far right talking points said their followers should believe. Then we were treated to a litany of empty accusations, distractions, and complaints for dragging the thread "off topic" by asking for evidence backing up the GOP version of reality.Isn't this thread supposed to be about Sec. Clinton's comments that some of Donald's most ardent believers might warrant cult deprogramming?
Oh, now posts are expected to directly answer questions? If so, I'm still waiting for actual quotes from the people allegedly paraphrased in e.g. post 277.So do you agree or disagree with Cinton regarding formal deprogramming?
Yeah what's your opinion regarding what Clinton said?Oh, now posts are expected to directly answer questions? If so, I'm still waiting for actual quotes from the people allegedly paraphrased in e.g. post 277.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?