• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

What are your sources in reference to the missing link? I know there have been several claims of finding it but I'm not aware that any of them have been substantiated.
 
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Aha... then you are the poster that I should be talking to about:

Do you want to see Intelligent Design taught in universities and schools?
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Reactions: DennisTate
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hi - nice atheist here

Hi and welcome to CF. With the exception of a few *cough cough*, most of us are pretty nice on here, including myself.
Were you ever a Christian or any other religion?



Hi & bye ...... you are ignored.

Kinda grumpy aren't ya?
 
Reactions: Joe Fizz
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

May I simply copy and paste this entire response over to:

Do you want to see Intelligent Design taught in universities and schools?
 
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


An online friend of mine for over three years claims to have met an alien species during his work for the CIA. Would you like me to send you a personal message with a link to a public post of his on that?

The man happens to write in such an off the scale brilliant manner on so many topics that CIA people would tend to know about.... that I personally take his claim very, very seriously!
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,103
52,639
Guam
✟5,147,014.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
An online friend of mine for over three years claims to have met an alien species during his work for the CIA.
I've got an alien species in my house! Lettuce that's been in the hydrator drawer since July!
 
Reactions: DennisTate
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I've got an alien species in my house! Lettuce that's been in the hydrator drawer since July!

LOL!

A near death experiencer made a statement about aliens that especially caught my attention:

allaboutchristian
.com/spirituality/
 
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Hi, Apostle Joseph. What are Holy Ghost fireworks?

I think I might be able to answer that.........

I got angry at God back in 1990 after beginning to read near death experience accounts.......

While I had believe in "soul sleep" I was quite enthusiastic with the Christian and Jewish Bible... .it seemed humane but as I began to read NDE's ... .I concluded that the Soul Sleep doctrine was a false understanding of many scriptures which.........

put me into a pretty serious ethical dilemma.........

How could somebody as obviously brilliant as Rabbi Yeshua - Jesus settle for a paradigm of 'many called / few chosen"...... "a broad way leading to destruction and many there be who go in thereat and a narrow way leading to life and few there be who find it"...... and an all too real hell or purgatory higher dimensional environment??????????



So I went and did something kind of dangerous and got myself into some pretty serious trouble......

I summarized what I did to my online friend Sanhedrin Rabbi Yeshayahu Hollander here:


My conversation with the Rabbi.....

Anyway....... I ended up being kind of a mess from 1990 to 2000......

I can identify more so with the guy who had the Legion than most other characters in the New Testament.... but in the year 2000 I wrote an e-mail to my soon to be wife.........

She is a gifted Pentecostal / Charismatic Christian from Ecuador......
she was somehow told that I was going to be her husband and that she should fast and pray for me for 35 days........

She obeyed.... for four weeks, 3 days / week only fruit jucies....
for the fifth week seven days in a row... only fruit juices and Messiah Yeshua - Jesus woke her up and got her to pray for me most mornings.....(maybe all of them)..... but anway.... I was 3000 miles away basking in the most astonishing peace of mind that I had ever had in my entire life...........

My wife has gifts that I still don't comprehend even 17 years later............
 
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Thanks - I've brought the document up in a browser tab (that's one way to have a to-do list , and will read it. It may take a bit, as things get busy at work (I'm writing this at 12:30 am).

Mellen Benedict made some astonishing assertions that I personally believe.......
how could I really argue with him?


That phrase....."chaos forming all possibilities" has huge implications.


I have a good friend whom I've known for 40 years who was a long-time member of the WWCG, and became very disillusioned after the death of Herbert W. Armstrong.

Yes..... I haven't read his book yet but obviously Pastor Dan Samson is on a very different page than when he was assistant pastor in Halifax, N. S. , Canada.

https://www.amazon.com/God-Evolution-Implications-Darwins-Fundamentalism/dp/0977604446

God and Evolution? - The Implications of Darwin's Theory for Fundamentalism, the Bible and the Meaning of Life Hardcover – 2006
by Daniel J. Samson (Author)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
They don't say AD and BC anymore, they call it the common era or some such.

Yes they changed it it not too long ago. But despite their attempts to remove Jesus' from the calendar it is still based on His birth year.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes they changed it it not too long ago. But despite their attempts to remove Jesus' from the calendar it is still based on His birth year.
I know, I'm just saying, they don't see it as before and after Christ even though it is. They want to call it the common era but I haven't seen a lot of reason for that except to remove the name of Christ from the calendar.
 
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Reactions: DennisTate
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
DennisTate said:
An online friend of mine for over three years claims to have met an alien species during his work for the CIA.
Probably brainwashed from watching "MIB" too many times........



....................................
I've got an alien species in my house! Lettuce that's been in the hydrator drawer since July!
Ha.
Will come in handy during a famine.......

Luke 21:23
"Woe to the ones in belly having and the ones suckling in those the days!
For shall be distress great upon the Land and wrath upon this people..


The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD

......The day on which Titus encompassed Jerusalem, was the feast of the Passover......

Meanwhile the horrors of famine grew still more melancholy and afflictive.
The Jews,...................
In the depth or this horrible extremity, a Jewess of noble family urged by the intolerable cravings of hunger, slew her infant child, and prepared it for a meal ; and had actually eaten one half thereof, when the soldiers, allured by tile smell of food, threatened her with instant death if she refused to discover it......

Reve 18:8
by this, in one day shall be arriving the blows of Her, death and sorrow and famine;
and in fire She shall be being burned, that strong Lord, the God, the one judging Her
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

grahamsnumber

Atheist
Oct 3, 2011
32
38
Orange County, California
✟25,256.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Hi, Graham! Welcome to CF!

Have you been an atheist all your life?
Hi, there. Sort of - I grew up in a house that wasn't religious. My mom was mildly religious, and would have called herself a Christian, but really that was a bit of a stretch; mostly she called herself that just because that was what the American culture commonly "told" you to be. When I was a kid, she took me to a non-denominational church regularly, and I even got prizes for memorizing the most scripture . But my dad was an atheist, and I got exposed to some of both sides. Most of my extended family wasn't religious either, but also wasn't aggressively anti-religious. I did have three very religious aunts, and a number of religious friends. I started doubting things at around age 12 or so.
 
Upvote 0

grahamsnumber

Atheist
Oct 3, 2011
32
38
Orange County, California
✟25,256.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

I watched the video, and have a few comments.
  • It is said, a few minutes into the video, that belief in evolution is based entirely on faith, and that no "true facts" have ever been found in support of it. Here I must strenuously disagree. A very common misunderstanding of the scientific community is that scientists are deathly afraid of accepted theories being disproved. In fact, the very opposite is true. In academia, the way you get ahead is exactly by changing or significantly extending current theories. You get a Nobel Prize by showing that something long accepted is wrong. Every physicist out there would be delighted to be the one who showed that Einstein's theory of gravity, General Relativity, was wrong. He'd be famous for centuries. The same holds true for evolution. No one has "faith" that evolution is true, and everyone would love to be the one to overturn it if it were false. However, the evidence for it is absolutely overwhelming. For example, it has been pointed out by biologists that we actually have more evidence for evolution just in genetic and chemical studies than we do that the Roman empire existed! And notice - this is not including the fossil record. Think about that. How do you know that the Roman Empire ever actually existed? It all comes down to evidence. Now, we have tons and tons of evidence that it did exist: we have many physical structures all over the western world, and we have lots and lots of written evidence from the time. But there is still some probability, some tiny, tiny probability, that it's all false - forged or misunderstood. Nothing has a probability of true zero. So maybe there's a 1 in a trillion trillion trillion chance that the Roman Empire didn't exist. Well, the chance the evolution isn't true, based only on genetic and other biological evidence, is less than that number. Throw in the fossil record, and the number drops way, way lower. Another misunderstanding I see a lot is that evolution is now at the same state that it was in the 19th century when Darwin first proposed it. Nothing could be further from the truth. Many scientists, over decades and decades, have tried to disprove it (that's what scientists do, all the time: try to disprove things) and have failed. What has happened is just the opposite: evidence has done nothing but accumulate at an ever-increasing rate. Remember, we now no longer even need the fossil record to prove evolution - that's just how the theory got started, and the vast majority of critics, such as are shown in the video, seem to be stuck arguing the evidence that was presented in 1859. Not only is it not true that "no true facts have ever been found that support it", in fact, no true fact has ever been found that doesn't support it.

  • The Wall Street Journal article he quotes, from 2014, uses the long-disproven "fine-tuning" argument, which basically sees the apparent fine-tuning of the universe to support life as evidence of a supernatural intelligence. The article was not written by a scientist, but by a religious writer. Now, obviously, that's not a problem in itself. But it does frequently mean that the understanding of complex scientific ideas may not be completely accurate, and we do indeed see that here. For example, we really don't know all the factors that would be required for life to exist. Rather, we have some idea of the factors that would allow life as we know it here on Earth to exist. And even that understanding is limited because the process is so complex. It has been pointed out that this really is an example of life being fine-tuned for the environment in which it evolved, rather than the other way around. Another claim the article makes is that since we haven't discovered any life anywhere else, the theory of evolution is shot. One problem here is that although we haven't found life yet, we continue to find planets around other stars that seem like they'd be capable of supporting life of some kind, and we're finding them at an increasing rate. The search continues, but even if no life is found, it is not a disproof of evolution, but rather a statement of something we already know - that the process itself is complex and takes a long time - maybe complex and slow enough that it just hasn't happened anywhere else in our part of our own galaxy (remember, there are over a hundred billion galaxies, each with hundreds of billions of stars). And quoting Fred Hoyle, a physicist, not a biologist, on evolution is a weak version of the argument from authority, in which an expert is found and cherry-picked, rather than looking at the overwhelming number of actual biologists on the other side. Being an outsider is fine, and the arguments are interesting and valid to have, but you can't use the one person you can find who agrees with you and plop him down on the table as if it vastly bolsters your case. Because I'll find thousands of academics, every bit as qualified as Hoyle (much more qualified, actually, since they are experts in the biology itself) to say the opposite.

  • Farther in, the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics are brought up in a way that has long been shown to be based on a faulty understanding of those laws. One argument he makes is that the radioactive elements such as uranium must all have come into existence in the beginning, since they've been decaying ever since. However, this is false. The big-bang model states that originally, only energy came into existence (but even this is hard to understand, because a common version of the theory has time itself starting at the same event), and eventually you got only one type of atom: hydrogen. All the other atomic varieties come into existence through fusion taking place in the center of stars, and the heavier elements like uranium are created when a star explodes in a supernova, and the vast forces involved end up making the heavy elements by fusing together lighter ones. This happens continually. Physicists like Lawrence Krauss have talked a lot about the "nothing from nothing" idea that is so counter-intuitive to humans. His book A Universe From Nothing is a very good popular-level discussion of the issue. A subtle and oft missed point, I think, is that the word "theory" in science and math doesn't mean the same thing that it does in everyday English. When we use the word in our daily life, we mean something more like a hunch or an idea. Scientifically, the word refers to a solid body of work that has a consistent model and has been vetted by different experts for a very long time. The "theory of evolution" isn't just some armchair-based speculation that happened over a beer by a couple of dudes having a good time. Rather, it is a consistent model of an enormous body of data that has been examined from every possible direction and tested over and over again in every possible way for over a century by hundreds of thousands of scientists from all over the world. Another point is that it is tempting but disastrous to use your everyday visualizations when trying to understand physics that is outside our everyday experience. Those visualizations are very useful for living on Earth as a biological being of our size. But they can lead you far astray if you rely on them when thinking about the huge scale, like cosmology, or the tiny scale, like quantum mechanics. In both of those areas, you have to cast aside your preconceived visualizations of how things work, and rely solely on the mathematics. This is because visualizing things like a 4-dimensional curved spacetime are impossible to directly do. But understanding them is not impossible if you use mathematics. You might not be able to "see" a curved spacetime, but you can work with it and apply it successfully by using the math, and that leads to a certain kind of understanding. This is all the more true when trying to talk about the origin of the universe, where time itself becomes highly nonlinear - something that is utterly foreign to us.
Haha, well, this post got a bit longer than I thought it would. So I'll shut up now.
 
Upvote 0

grahamsnumber

Atheist
Oct 3, 2011
32
38
Orange County, California
✟25,256.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

Sure!
 
Upvote 0