Calvinist Dark Lord
Regular Member
- Apr 8, 2003
- 1,589
- 468
- Faith
- Presbyterian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Not a problem Nancy.Thank you for your answer!
i find Rand especially troubling. Not because she's any worse than any other person, but because her view are so close to the truth that they make the deception hard to find.
Right now Rand's work is finding a resurgence due in part to Ron Paul's campaign back in 2008 and the Tea Parties presently going on...Incidentally, Rand Paul, son of Ron Paul and currently seeking the Republican nomination for US Senate for Kentucky is NOT named after Ayn Rand. His name is actually Randall.
i take comfort in the fact that Ayn Rand despised Libertarians. That's ok, many of us despised that old hedonist witch too.
Like Steve Allen*, when Rand spoke of Morality, she spoke nonsense from her atheistic perspective. There is, as C. S. Lewis pointed out in The Abolition of Man no way to get from the Indicative (THIS is beneficial) to the Imperative (DO THIS!) without a Law Giver.
Even to speak of the rights of man is nonsense from Rand's atheistic perspective. Without the existence of God, by what basis does one make man a unique creature with rights? Aside from the intelligent use of force, none at all. All Rand manages to do is confirm Mao's statement that power comes from the barrel of a gun. If another creature comes along that can use superior force, then where are "the rights of man"?
The problem is never the bottle that is LABELED as poison. The problem is the bottle that has poisonous ingredients on that contents label that my eyes won't let me read any more. Ayn Rand is that second bottle.
*i have read that shortly before his fatal automobile accident, Allen converted to Christianity and became a Presbyterian. i have no way of verifying this assertion.
Upvote
0
