Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What is most alarming to me is that this man has the complete support of a significant portion of the electorate who are in my view diehard followers. If Trump says that the investigation is a hoax, they believe him. If Trump tweets that we should investigate the investigators, theses followers become outraged at dedicated public servants doing their job. So I seriously think that because of this fanaticism the President is a very dangerous person and should be removed immediately.
What is most alarming to me is that this man has the complete support of a significant portion of the electorate who are in my view diehard followers. If Trump says that the investigation is a hoax, they believe him. If Trump tweets that we should investigate the investigators, these followers become outraged at dedicated public servants for simply doing their job. So I seriously think that because of this fanaticism the President is a very dangerous person and should be removed immediately.
2 Timothy 3-4 said:For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.
No,no...YOU made the claim...YOU support it..!
Okie Dokie:
QUOTE:
IV Conclusion
Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.Now, your turn - where does the report say the President is guilty of obstruction.
Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
He's saying it's not the Special Counsel's decision. They don't say he's guilty they don't say he's innocent. They are passing that decision to someone else.
Me. I find him guilty. Done.
Agree, mueller punted on concluding yea or nea on obstruction.
On the specifice piece of obstruction, the house can decide whether they want to build a case and impeach.
Impeachment would be entertaining, but there is risk for the dems.
Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
He's saying it's not the Special Counsel's decision. They don't say he's guilty they don't say he's innocent. They are passing that decision to someone else.
Me. I find him guilty. Done.
That is why the court of public opinion carries no weight
Except that we get to vote.
Okie Dokie:
QUOTE:
IV Conclusion
Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.Now, your turn - where does the report say the President is guilty of obstruction.
Exactly right.
Trump/Pence 2020
But as for the topic of the thread. There is not enough evidence to bring a charge.
You can enthusiastically vote for a man for whom you have to say (incorrectly) "well, at least 'There is not enough evidence to bring a charge.'"?
Is it really incorrect? Then investigate Mueller. He's the one who came to that conclusion.
Apparently there is. Mueller is just leaving it to another body to decide.
You can enthusiastically vote for a man for whom you have to say (incorrectly) "well, at least 'There is not enough evidence to bring a charge.'"?
Again: it's not a matter of there isn't enough evidence. Mueller and his team simply aren't making that decision.
Perhaps this will be how it plays out?Then why don't the democrats in congress want to just let the voters be the ones to make that decision? The 2020 election is when they get to do that.
Perhaps this will be how it plays out?
Maybe after a summer of House subcommittee hearings where “the Fifth” is invoked more times than at a Jack Daniel’s reunion festival, they might get enough feedback to weigh other options?
Pelosi only knows!They could waste their time on such a political stunt like that, or they could just allow the people to see how the president's policies play out so they can decide if they want him to continue after 2020 or be replaced by someone else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?