• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

help on a theological point

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sojourner<><

Incoherent Freedom Fighter
Mar 23, 2005
1,606
14
45
✟24,385.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I've been reading AV1611VET and DAD's postings over on C&E for awhile now. One thing that they both say appears to be doctrine in some denomination or church circles. However i am unfamiliar with it and need help from those more familiar with the ideas.

Both of them make a big point that the Fall caused the Creation to be "unreadable" before it. They propose that the Fall changed physical constants etc so that any "extrapolation" back more than 6K years is simply impossible.

This really sounds like a special doctrine, perhaps something in 19thC dispensationalism. So does anyone know where this comes from, or who first proposed it? i'd appreciate references that outline the doctrine and the reasons for it.

tia.

from: http://www.christianforums.com/showpost.php?p=29533091&postcount=92

he has two other quotes from the "defender's study Bible".
is anyone familiar with these footnotes that can help me track down these ideas?

notes:
it looks like the footnotes in the Defender's Study Bible are by Henry Morris of ICR (in)fame.
http://www.study-bibles.net/kjv/defenders_study_bible.html

now to track down the origins of his theology.

In his book The Genesis Record, Morris draws on a number of sources to establish his viewpoint.

In regards to the physical constants, Morris writes: "A longer chronology, which of course is needed to support the modern dogma of evolution, must be based on uniformitarian extrapolation of certain present physical processes. It should be recognized, however, that all such calculations necessarily must be based on a number of unproved and, as a matter of fact, untestable assumptions."(p. 44)
 
Upvote 0

Sojourner<><

Incoherent Freedom Fighter
Mar 23, 2005
1,606
14
45
✟24,385.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In his book The Genesis Record, Morris draws on a number of sources to establish his viewpoint.

In regards to the physical constants, Morris writes: "A longer chronology, which of course is needed to support the modern dogma of evolution, must be based on uniformitarian extrapolation of certain present physical processes. It should be recognized, however, that all such calculations necessarily must be based on a number of unproved and, as a matter of fact, untestable assumptions."(p. 44)






Actually, he doesn't seem to provide any other sources for his non-uniformitarian views other than the Bible itself and science. On pages 126 and 127 he writes:
"...Since all flesh is made of the earth's physical elements, it also is subject to the law of decay and death and as 'grass, withereth ... and falleth away' (I Peter 1:24). It is universal experience that all things, living or nonliving, eventually wear out, run down, grow old, decay, and pass into the dust.​
This condition is so universal that it was formalized about a hundred years ago (by Carnot, Clausius, Kelvin, and other scientists) into a fundamental scientific law, now called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law states that all systems, if left to themselves, tend to become degraded or disordered. It has also been called the 'law of morpholysis' (from a Greek word meaning 'loosing of structure'). Physical systems, whether watches or suns, eventually wear out. Organisms grow old and die. Hereditary changes in species are caused by gene mutations (sudden random disruptions in their highly ordered genetic systems) which in many cases have resulted in deterioration or extinction of the species itself. Even apart from mutations, the deterioration of the environment has often led to species extinction.​
Instead of all things being 'made' - that is, organized into complex systems - as they were in Creation Week, they are now being 'unmade,' becoming disorganized and simple. Instead of life and growth, there comes decay and death; instead of evolution, there is degeneration.​
This, then, is the true origin of the strange law of disorder and decay, the universally applicable, all-important Second Law of Thermodynamics. Herein is the secret of all that's wrong with the world. Man is a sinner and has brought God's curse on the earth."​
Other than this, he does make reference to another theologian's work as the most accurate Biblical chronology but he says this work was done way before Darwin or the advent of modern dating methods.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.