• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Chilldogg77 said:
"Postmodernism's predecessor was modernism. Modernism says there is an absolute truth, and we can arrive at the truth on our own, through reason. But of course God is supernatural and we are temporal, so we cannot."

Well, what does "on our own" mean? We can't exist on our own. But does it take a supernatural occurance? I'm sure that there are people who have accepted Jesus through reason, which then lead to faith.

"On our own" means without God. No-we can't. We don't have the faculties to see God with physical eyes or hear Him with physical ears. We have to see Him through our souls, through the indwelling of God's Holy Spirit. It is His Spirit that reveals the truth to us. Those who are not indwelt require proof for what they believe because they do not hear or see. They've read the same word from God that Christians have, but without the Holy Spirit revealing to them the truth of it, to them it is just a book written by men. THey hear God's word, but their eyes haven't been opened to the power of it, to the fact that it is a living, breathing, document. To them it's just a book. Here is the scripture that shows this:

Matthew 13:10-23

10*And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11*He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. 12*For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13*Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14*And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15*For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. 16*But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear. 17*For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them. 18*Hear ye therefore the parable of the sower. 19*When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth it not, then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side. 20*But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21*Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. F27 22*He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful. 23*But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

This shows God's sovereignty. Ten through fourteen deal with God's sovereignty, and the rest deal with the actions of man for which God has hidden His truth from them.

Romans 8:29-30:

29*For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30*Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

God is sovereign and has predestined His chosen vessels. Since many of us were born into a physical republic, we think that's how God operates, too. But it isn't. The world is a Theocracy. This does not mean that we shouldn't strive to enter the Kingdom of Heaven; satan will often use this to twist scripture and attemt to impede people from entering God's kingdom, saying that if God is sovereign, they do not need to seek Him, regardless of His will for them. This is emphatically not the case. We are all to seek Him, because this is the natural means God has chosen to employ in our salvation. Cooperation between God and His creatures. ( See Matthew 4 for an example of how satan distorts scripture.) But God promises to reward those who faithfully seek Him.

More evidence that we cannot be saved without God. We are saved by grace through faith. As it is written in Ephesians 2:8

2:8For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

We cannot know the truth of God who cannot be seen or heard with temporal faculties. How can we know Him who we have not seen? If we could arrive at this through reason, we wouldn't have so many world religions. There are highly intelligent people from every nation. But there is a difference between God's wisdom and the limited wisdom of man. As it is written:

1*Corinthians 1:17-31

1:17For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, F3 lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

1:18For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1:19For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

1:20Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

1:21For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

1:22For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:

1:23But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;

1:24But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

1:25Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

1:26For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:

1:27But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

1:28And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:

1:29That no flesh should glory in his presence.

1:30But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:

1:31That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.


THere is so much more on this in the Bible, too, but if I wrote it all this post would be unbearable long.

If you baked a cake for a friend Christmas and you had it sitting on your counter, and you saw someone heading toward it with a plate and a fork, would you not tell the person not to eat it? Wouldn't you tell the person you had baked it for someone else? In the same way, God is sovereign over His creation that He likewise created for His own purposes.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
First Echelon said:
I agree that people do it all the time, that is why I ended in the question, Will they?

But there is no possibly more effective attempt at control.

We watch criminals be punished but we still commit crimes.

We see lovers torn apart but we still love.

Although Hell is not perfect, it does incite a general order.

Without incentive to do well, people would slowly skew their ideas of right and wrong.

The truth is, God reveals the reality of hell not to keep the world from sinning, for only through His mercy and the indwelling of His Holy Spirit can we do that, but rather to render us withour excuse at the judgment where we really will see His sovereignty.

(See above post to Chilidog for scriptures.)
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟26,132.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Chilldogg77 said:
The discussion seems to have moved from hell to truth. Both are interesting, so I'll jump in again. Tcampen and whitehorse seem to be struggling to find some middle ground. Whitehorse says that all truth is revealed to us by God.
Nonsence, T might say, what about the truths of math, science, history, etc? These are objective truths, unlike your subjective religious truths.
Ah, says whitehorse, but what would man be able to learn/discover without God? Nothing! Because we and everything else would not exist without God.
But God has not revealed to me that he even exists, says Tcampen, and there's no way to show objectively that he does.
Enter Chilldogg. What if I could show you, Tcampen, a mountain of evidence that no one could explain without the existence of God, that strongly points to God as the source of this evidence? I'm talking about actual events and physical evidence that can be and often have been researched and scrutinized. I'm talking about miracles. Through miracles, God reveals his existence to anyone willing to learn about them. This is objective and factual, and not based on only personal revelation, which you may doubt the credibility of. I encourage you to look into accepted miracles of the Catholic Church. They do not easily accept miracles, but send people to search very hard for any sort of natural explanation. Were they to accept the miracle, and have it later discounted, they would look very foolish. Some of the most famous cases are the incorruptibles, bodies of saints who have not decomposed, the miracle at fatima and the prophecies of fatima, and the stigmata, medically documented cases of people recieving the wounds of Christ. This is just the tip of the iceburg, that I mention off the top of my head. If you search for objective religious truth, or at least objective evidence to be vindicated or discounted, give it a chance and see what you think. You have little to lose and much to gain.
You're confusing not knowing how somthing occurs with it necessarily requiring a supernatural explanation. The same approach applied to lightening not all that long ago. Do you really beleive lightening is a purely supernatural event? The Holy Incorruptibles have never been seriously studied scientifically, and such lack of decomposition is not reserved for just Catholics or Christians in general, necessarily. I'm not ruling out supernatural forces being involved, but you cannot claim that all reasonable scientific research into this phenomena has been exhausted. Not by any stretch.

As for Fatima, I don't know. It's extremely similar to the accounts at Majorjerie (sp?), Yugoslavia, with the teens who say the Holy Mother and the Ten Secrets she is revealing to them over the last decade plus. And did you know the Virgin Mary told these teens all the world's major religions are valid paths to God? Just a side note.

I recognize it's difficult to discount such eyewitness accounts, and I don't, necessarily. But I do take it with a grain of salt. Tens of thousands (probably more) of Americans claim to have either seen an alien space craft or have been abducted by aliens. Can their experiences by discounted any more than those at Fatima? I don't know. Reasonalbe people can go either way on these things precisely because so little can be objectively verified about such occurances.

All I'm saying is the "I don't know how..." doesn't necessarily = "God must have done it."
 
Upvote 0

Blissman

God is Truth- A. Einstein
Nov 29, 2003
354
11
112
IA, USA
Visit site
✟551.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
That this becomes a need for objective proof raises an interesting question. Since faith is based on a lack of evidence, would religion be destroyed if you were able to prove that God exists? I submit that this is not as easy a question as it may appear to be on it's face.
Part of Christianity, for example, is that the Bible can be interpreted so that each person can see their own situations, and use the Bible as a path to the Lord. Billions of people with differing languages, and with different experiences in life can find God because the Bible is, with the execeptions of laws, imprecise. The concept of forgivess does not explictly say what may be forgiven (that is, it does not say that a green colored peice of chewing gum is to forgiven, but a red one would not be (assuming that chewing a certain color of gum could be a sin). Part of finding truth is that for man, it is impossible to know every detail. Everyone has to seek truth. Everyone has to seek God. Truth and God are not mathematical equations.
There is nothing wrong with a beautiful idea such as math. You can see math in life (such as the golden Fibonnci sequence in a pine cone). Math does have it's own truth. But the truth in math has nothing to do with THE truth.
In Physics, which is a seductively delicious fruit, ultimately, you end up in existentialst agnst.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Blissman said:
That this becomes a need for objective proof raises an interesting question. Since faith is based on a lack of evidence, would religion be destroyed if you were able to prove that God exists? I submit that this is not as easy a question as it may appear to be on it's face.
Part of Christianity, for example, is that the Bible can be interpreted so that each person can see their own situations, and use the Bible as a path to the Lord. Billions of people with differing languages, and with different experiences in life can find God because the Bible is, with the execeptions of laws, imprecise. The concept of forgivess does not explictly say what may be forgiven (that is, it does not say that a green colored peice of chewing gum is to forgiven, but a red one would not be (assuming that chewing a certain color of gum could be a sin). Part of finding truth is that for man, it is impossible to know every detail. Everyone has to seek truth. Everyone has to seek God. Truth and God are not mathematical equations.
There is nothing wrong with a beautiful idea such as math. You can see math in life (such as the golden Fibonnci sequence in a pine cone). Math does have it's own truth. But the truth in math has nothing to do with THE truth.
In Physics, which is a seductively delicious fruit, ultimately, you end up in existentialst agnst.

Well, for religion to be destroyed would mean there was no true God. And this is true of every other religion. True religion isn't about religion or man's priorities. It is about God. False religion is about man wanting to find God on *his* terms rather than God's, or not wanting to find God at all. THis creates a serious problem: man simply does not have this authority, and it is in human nature to refuse to relinquish the control he never had but still craves.

Moreover, many people do interpret the Bible the way they want to, but this is not how it is intended to be read. And that's why heresies pop up like dandelions. Like any letter, it is meant to be read for how the Writer meant it (meaning God rather than His chosen scribes), not how the reader wants to interpret it. And this is true of any letter, especially important ones. We need to read it the way God meant it to be read. It can only be enlightened by His Holy Spirit.

Blessings,
Whitehorse
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟26,132.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Whitehorse said:
Well, for religion to be destroyed would mean there was no true God. And this is true of every other religion. True religion isn't about religion or man's priorities. It is about God. False religion is about man wanting to find God on *his* terms rather than God's, or not wanting to find God at all. THis creates a serious problem: man simply does not have this authority, and it is in human nature to refuse to relinquish the control he never had but still craves.
I couldn't agree with this statement more. The problem is, it applies to all people, including all Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Wiccans, Atheists, Agnostics, you name it. Everyone, even me.

Moreover, many people do interpret the Bible the way they want to, but this is not how it is intended to be read. And that's why heresies pop up like dandelions. Like any letter, it is meant to be read for how the Writer meant it (meaning God rather than His chosen scribes), not how the reader wants to interpret it. And this is true of any letter, especially important ones. We need to read it the way God meant it to be read. It can only be enlightened by His Holy Spirit.
Everyone believes everyone other than themselves interprets the bible incorrectly and not in accordance with God's intent. Funny how this works. All these born again, saved, bible-believing Christians who fail to agree on God's word, will, intent or desires on both trivial and material points. Everyone interprets it the way they want to, deep down inside, otherwise there wouldn't be so many different interpretations of it. Think about it...tens of thousands of Christian denominations and countless more independent churches are the greatest evidence of this fact.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
tcampen said:
I couldn't agree with this statement more. The problem is, it applies to all people, including all Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Wiccans, Atheists, Agnostics, you name it. Everyone, even me.

T, can you be more specific about why you disagree with the statement?


Everyone believes everyone other than themselves interprets the bible incorrectly and not in accordance with God's intent. Funny how this works. All these born again, saved, bible-believing Christians who fail to agree on God's word, will, intent or desires on both trivial and material points. Everyone interprets it the way they want to, deep down inside, otherwise there wouldn't be so many different interpretations of it. Think about it...tens of thousands of Christian denominations and countless more independent churches are the greatest evidence of this fact.[/QUOTE]

T, this can't be resolved until we finally decide once and for all whether God is the authority, or man. You seem to feel it is man, and I'm interested to hear what you'd have to say as to why.
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟26,132.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Whitehorse said:
T, can you be more specific about why you disagree with the statement?
I said I agreed, so I'm not following you. Sorry.


T, this can't be resolved until we finally decide once and for all whether God is the authority, or man. You seem to feel it is man, and I'm interested to hear what you'd have to say as to why.
Millions (even billions) of people claim to have submitted to God's authority, but have incompatable stances on what that means, entails, or results in. While one may claim they are following God's authority rather than man's, the fact that there is such a lack of consistency among all those who profess this exact same sentiment that there has got to be something else going on. One reasonable explanation is that they are deep down inside following what they want to believe, perhaps even subconsciously, but have convinced themselves they are doing God's will. Clearly no-one who claims to follow God's will wants to be in this camp, but are quick to point out everyone who has a different idea of following God's authority is really not. Who's right? You? Me? The Pope? The Dali Lama? L. Ron Hubbard? Heck, I don't know. Like I said, everyone thinks everyone BUT themselves interprets scripture incorrectly.

I've concluded from the evidence that everyone follows what they want to believe for whatever reason. Most of the time it is a good thing, but evil can come from this as well. People have relied on God's authority to crash jets into buildings. Clearly this sounds absurd to us, but clearly wasn't even worth a second thought to those flying the planes.

So, rather than having to decide that the authority must either be God or man, since well never find any consistent view of either, I believe we should focus more on methodologies that have been proven effective in determining the truth. It's also important to understand what kind of truth we're talking about - objective truth that can be independently verified, or subjective (i.e. spiritual) truth that requires some kind of personal revelation to understand. They are qualitatively different.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Wonderful post, T.

tcampen said:
Millions (even billions) of people claim to have submitted to God's authority, but have incompatable stances on what that means, entails, or results in. While one may claim they are following God's authority rather than man's, the fact that there is such a lack of consistency among all those who profess this exact same sentiment that there has got to be something else going on. One reasonable explanation is that they are deep down inside following what they want to believe, perhaps even subconsciously, but have convinced themselves they are doing God's will.

Yes! Amen!

Clearly no-one who claims to follow God's will wants to be in this camp, but are quick to point out everyone who has a different idea of following God's authority is really not. Who's right? You? Me? The Pope? The Dali Lama? L. Ron Hubbard? Heck, I don't know. Like I said, everyone thinks everyone BUT themselves interprets scripture incorrectly.

Yes. So the answer would be to know God first, and I realize we have yet to sort that out, and then after that, we have to scrutinize our hearts. It's the motive. Is it to live the way we want to? Or is it to truly know the truth?

I've concluded from the evidence that everyone follows what they want to believe for whatever reason. Most of the time it is a good thing, but evil can come from this as well. People have relied on God's authority to crash jets into buildings. Clearly this sounds absurd to us, but clearly wasn't even worth a second thought to those flying the planes.

In the vast majority of cases, this is true. People do want to believe what they want to believe, especially when the truth entails things like...submission! So, yes. Here is the motive involved. Only a few truly want truth for truth's sake. And that's why only a few ever find it.

We will note that the plane hijackers were promised a virgin harem as their reward to this service to the moon god. They didn't mind killing, to get a harem of women. Is there not an inherent greed in this? For all their outward condemnation of America and its excess, they are actually far more excessive in their tastes, and this was one example. Kill thousands to get such a reward? Who would offer such a thing? And what kind of person would accept it? Does this not war against the laws of love and justice that are inherently written on our hearts? And now, Who put the law of love and justice on our hearts?

In every place in the world, people believe God is good. Now, some may be angry because of great suffering. But the reason they are angry is because it appears to them that God has not been good, when in their hearts they expect Him to be, because they know truly that He is good. If they doubted His goodness truly, they would not be angry-only glad things were not worse from a God they think is merciless. They would not dare rail at Him if they though He was merciless enough to strike them dead on the spot, but they do in fact rail at Him because they know He is good.

...And, those attacks on the WTC were *not* good. And neither was the reward for services rendered. Anyone can see it was evil. So we can safely discount that religion.

So, rather than having to decide that the authority must either be God or man, since well never find any consistent view of either, I believe we should focus more on methodologies that have been proven effective in determining the truth. It's also important to understand what kind of truth we're talking about - objective truth that can be independently verified, or subjective (i.e. spiritual) truth that requires some kind of personal revelation to understand. They are qualitatively different.

Well, we still need to determine whether the authority is God or man. Because people haven't doesn't mean we shouldn't. For not doing so has led us to the moral soup of the postmodern era. In fact, we need to investigate it more closely. While methods are important, and let's examine these, to do so without finding the source is like finding ways to get to Toledo without first finding it on the map.

Excellent observations, T.
 
Upvote 0

Charles Darwin

Druidic Deist
Nov 18, 2003
664
12
37
Virgina
✟23,377.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Engaged
Whitehorse said:
Well, we still need to determine whether the authority is God or man. Because people haven't doesn't mean we shouldn't. For not doing so has led us to the moral soup of the postmodern era. In fact, we need to investigate it more closely. While methods are important, and let's examine these, to do so without finding the source is like finding ways to get to Toledo without first finding it on the map.

The moral soup is all subjective and the problem with proving either is that humans have an incredibly hard time grasping the concept of infinity/forever/without beginning or end. So since we rationalize everything and always end up asking "well didnt that come from somewhere" we might as well put the effort into working with out fellow man to improve society here and now. Just a thought
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Charles Darwin said:
The moral soup is all subjective and the problem with proving either is that humans have an incredibly hard time grasping the concept of infinity/forever/without beginning or end. So since we rationalize everything and always end up asking "well didnt that come from somewhere" we might as well put the effort into working with out fellow man to improve society here and now. Just a thought

Do you mean we should do this without determining the authority, or do you mean we should do this after finding the authority on absolute truth?
 
Upvote 0