Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
lily00 said:"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." John 1:1
I feel that this verse along with others are correct in God's word. The reason is I can't explain it, but I feel God when I read His word. I feel Him in the words, telling me what I should do, and what I should learn. That is why God's word has such an effect on people's lives.
But deception is an act of evil. What if he made all the parts about goodness and righteousness to deceive you??lily00 said:The sheep know the voice of its shepherd. Satan has fooled many individuals but God's word is not that. If that was the case, satan would have never wrote all of the parts on goodness and righteousness. It is what he despises. He is all evil, and God is all good.
lily00 said:The sheep know the voice of its shepherd. Satan has fooled many individuals but God's word is not that. If that was the case, satan would have never wrote all of the parts on goodness and righteousness. It is what he despises. He is all evil, and God is all good.
lily00 said:The sheep know the voice of its shepherd. Satan has fooled many individuals but God's word is not that. If that was the case, satan would have never wrote all of the parts on goodness and righteousness. It is what he despises. He is all evil, and God is all good.
awstar said:they haven't the slightest clue as to how life formed - but they are ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE that God didn't do it. The diligent search for truth and knowledge -- er "science" you say?
Mocca said:Provide support for your assertion that the scientists are absolutely positive that "God didn't do it."
1 MR. ROTHSCHILD: Good morning, Your Honor.
2 My co-counsel and I represent eleven parents who are
3 challenging the Dover Area School District's change to
4 its biology curriculum. That change to the biology
5 curriculum, which is displayed on your monitor and on
6 the screen, singles out the scientific theory of
7 evolution, among all the scientific concepts taught to
8 Dover High School students, as being suspect and
9 promotes the religious proposition of intelligent
10 design as a competing scientific theory.
11 Eighteen years ago, the United States
12 Supreme Court, in Edwards versus Aguillard, held that
13 public schools could not teach students creation
14 science because that proposition's core concept of a
15 supernatural creator is religious, not scientific, and
16 therefore violates the establishment clause of the
17 First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
18 The Court recognized that the teaching of creation
19 science was motivated by a religious and cultural
20 agenda, not the improvement of scientific education.
21 What we will prove at this trial is that the
22 Dover board policy has the same characteristics and
23 the same constitutional defects as the creation
24 science policy struck down in Edwards. You will hear
25 testimony from members of the Dover community, these
Page 5
1 parents, teachers, administrators, and board members,
2 about how this change to the curriculum came to be.
3 Board members announced their interest in
4 the topic of evolution in starkly religious terms.
5 They looked for a book that could provide a religious
6 alternative to evolution, and they found one in Of
7 Pandas and People.
8 They changed the science curriculum to
9 advance a specific religious viewpoint, and in doing
10 so, they ignored accepted scientific knowledge, failed
11 to avail themselves of the advice of established
12 scientific organizations, and ignored their own
13 science teachers who opposed the change to the science
14 curriculum.
15 They did everything you would do if you
16 wanted to incorporate a religious topic in science
17 class and cared nothing about its scientific validity.
18 And we will show that the members of the school board
19 that passed this policy expressed their desire to
20 teach creationism over and over and over again.
21 That's their word, "creationism."
MORE plausible?awstar said:What if the school board just wanted to introduce a more plausible explaination of life and its origin?
No they are notawstar said:No can do -- because the high priests of the atheistic religion who invoke the name of SCIENCE are in control of our judicial system
Provide a quote from a scientisit (besides Dawkins) that states that God (by any definition) could not have had anything to do with the state of the universe as we know itawstar said:and they are ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE God didn't do it. All other points of view, no matter how obvious, will not be tolerated.
lily00 said:God writes how we can fight evilness, and what will happen to the wicked. He doesn't tell us how to be evil, He lists out the things that are evil.
Satan wouldn't describe how to be good, how to have salvation, how to pray. Where do I find His character traits? Just as I feel God when I pray, I feel Satan when I sin. I feel the burden on me. He wouldn't write a righteous book like that...
lily00 said:God wouldn't allow something like that though. Without the Bible, we wouldn't even know about God and Satan. God is more powerful then Satan and He cares about us. He would want to get to us first and then give us a free will to choose.
awstar said:My support for the assertion that the scientists are absolutely positive the "God didn't do it"
The above is the opening transcript from the Dover Trial
What if the school board just wanted to introduce a more plausible explaination of life and its origin? No can do -- because the high priests of the atheistic religion who invoke the name of SCIENCE are in control of our judicial system and they are ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE God didn't do it. All other points of view, no matter how obvious, will not be tolerated.
lily00 said:God writes how we can fight evilness, and what will happen to the wicked. He doesn't tell us how to be evil, He lists out the things that are evil.
Satan wouldn't describe how to be good, how to have salvation, how to pray. Where do I find His character traits? Just as I feel God when I pray, I feel Satan when I sin. I feel the burden on me. He wouldn't write a righteous book like that...
lily00 said:God wouldn't allow something like that though. Without the Bible, we wouldn't even know about God and Satan. God is more powerful then Satan and He cares about us.
lily00 said:He would want to get to us first and then give us a free will to choose.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?