rosenherman
Sparkly rainbow butterfly kitten
It's even better when they decide what it is you think without even asking let alone hearing from you.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's even better when they decide what it is you think without even asking let alone hearing from you.You'll get that a lot here.
Wait until you have several thousand posts, then someone shows up out of the blue acting like they know everything you've ever said.
Or someone with less posts than their IQ says something like, "But you said [insert the opposite of what you said here]"?
Don't worry about it, you're young, you've got plenty of time to change.Indeed, as I have said before -- ignorance and pride is a combination which never ends well.
The other questions are no and the last one I don't even know who Kent whoever is nor do I care. It has taken books and books and books and opinions and opinions and arguments and counter arguments for you to get to evolution?...Wow
I got one book on earth's and man's origin and it has the whole truth.
Ever heard of "one can work hard, or one can work smart?"
It doesn't matter which interpretation you use; you use that interpretation based on your own beliefs. You are confusing your interpretation of the Bible with the word of God. The fact that the Bible might not say what you think it does is enough to PWN the Bible as a credible source against evolution.Gaara, I refuse to address the point that it's "my interpretation".
How I interpret the Bible is well-known, and is called the Grammatical-Historical Method.
Saying, "Well, that's your interpretation," is just another way of saying you think I'm wrong.
I'm not alone in "my interpretations".
Besides, whose interpretation do you want me to use?
How's come Gaara got what I was saying [I think], and you didn't?
I haven't read the Necronomicon, yet I believe it is evil.
I haven't read about evolution, yet I believe it is wrong.
I'm talking about someone whose JOIN DATE is < month.But what if the person in question admits that over several thousand posts, they've actually said very little?
It's even better when they decide what it is you think without even asking let alone hearing from you.[/quote
This goes more than one way. AV is noted for sayings like "you guys hate me not for who I am but for what I am". Now, tis true that at my urging, he finally quit saying that, but look what goes into it..
Like deciding what other people feel, and why they feel it, despite no actual way of knowing it, and despite the fact that it wasnt even true.
Which book in this pile of today's-science-tomorrow do you want me to read, then?The Necronomicon is not SCIENCE therefore your analogy is flawed.
Evolution is not tantamount to conjuring evil spirits. What part of that don't YOU get?
Post count does not equal a formal education at a University.
I have one word: Leviticus.Which book in this pile of today's-science-tomorrow do you want me to read, then?
You think this is easy? A piece of cake? A walk in the park?Part of the appeal is that it requires no effort, no knowledge, no brains or skill. Just say "goddidit", and win. In their own minds.
Going back to whether or not scientific theories can be proven is kind of like going back to grade school, ok? Please?
Its like this. you get data together, then look for a way to explain it.
That is common enough in daily life. Science proceeds by developing theories and then trying to falsify them. If you cant falisfy it, well, its a pretty good theory. In many years and many tries, nobody has had any luck at all trying to disprove evoluution. It should be easy, if it is false, there should be mountains of proof.
Disproving god is quite different. So is proving god. There is no way to apply any data to it.
When you talk about how its impossible to prove evolution you are really just showing that you dont know enough about science to make a meaningful comment.
What are the others?In fact, if evolution was proven as you say then there would only be Creationist who disagreed, but that isn't the only two theories.
Constancy is not necessarily a good thing.The Bible is constant, science is not.
Yes, the answer is not, because "evolved" is an utterly meaningless term in this context.Recently I heard that some bacteria was found alive in a liquid bubble sealed in a Mesozoic salt dome. That is great. My question is then: Do we find that particular type of bacteria less evolved than the current version?
I bet the answer is not. That fits my OP on that thread: Bacteria do not evolve. (should that one be revived?)
The "I know you are but what am I" approach is, well, easy and a piece of cake. Actually reading and becoming somewhat educated on ToE so as to have intelligent discourse with internets buddies, not so much.Excellent analogy, Hespera, until you get to this part:You think this is easy? A piece of cake? A walk in the park?
I may be wrong, its just an idea that I have.... but i think that the basic theocreo way of thinking goes something like this:
It does snot matter a bit how many how good or how convincing the arguments, data, anything brought out be science in support of evolution, for a simple reason: the bible is Right and so they are Right.
My analogy would be a parent with a surveillance video catches the kid with his hand in the cookie jar, so to speak.
When confronted with did you do it? he might provide any number of plausible explanations but the video trumps them all. Parent can listen with amused patience while the most wonderfully complex and convincing story is told... stuff they might well believe if they didnt have the Proof.
But at the end you can just say "here is the video". "goddidit" is the same way.
Part of the appeal is that it requires no effort, no knowledge, no brains or skill. Just say "goddidit", and win. In their own minds.
Excellent analogy, Hespera, until you get to this part:You think this is easy? A piece of cake? A walk in the park?
What are the others?
Constancy is not necessarily a good thing.
Yes, the answer is not, because "evolved" is an utterly meaningless term in this context.
This is precisely my point. You don't understand evolution.
Ok, I will bite. Show me the proof and I am not gonna read 25 books....give me the "Evolution is for Dummies" stream-lined edition.
Not on your life.I have one word: Leviticus.
I know, science is stupid. Get off your computer. It uses scientific technology.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?