• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Has the Good News been preached throughout the whole world?

Status
Not open for further replies.

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
HUBIE said:
Bill,

I'm a firm believer in Sola Scriptura myself. I don't however agree that Paul's definition and Jesus's definition of "World" are/were the same. 1st Century Christians couldn't understand how Christs Return could be at midday and the middle of the night at the same time. We understand, because we know the earth is round and daytime here is the middle of the night on the other side. The Roman Empire was Paul's "World", but it wasn't Jesus's. My own personal opinion is that the scripture "Gospel" has NOT yet been preached to everyone. I think we are close, but no cigar yet.

Another prophecy to ponder is the Olive Tree. Israel became a nation again in 1948. Jesus said that this generation would not pass before his return. Soo.... how long is a generation? How many people left have not heard the Gospel?

Wouldn't it be cool to be witnessing to a guy/gal and look up to see Jesus coming in Glory! Oh, well..... it's obvious I'm weird....
Bill,
The ancients knew the world was round.
Many ancients traveled between the continents.
South America and North America -the western continents- were settled after the Babylonian confusion of languages, as all continents were.

We're still emerging out of the dark ages as far as the spread of historical facts about the ancients is concerned.
The Gospel went around the world in the first century -and will continue to spread as each generation comes and goes- until the end of the world.

From only the Greek perspective, a bit of history is found here -I did a google http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:53YN1Xh9CvcJ:celator.com/cws/marotta.html+early+man+knew+world+was+round&hl=en

But the Africans, the Chinese, the Indian (of the continent) all had their merchants who settled and traveled and traded in to and with the western continents from the time of the diffusion of the peoples by language division.
 
Upvote 0

armothe

Living in HIS kingdom...
May 22, 2002
977
40
51
Visit site
✟24,061.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Constitution
The author was the same (Holy Spirit).
The spoken language Christ an Paul used were the same (Hebrew & Aramaic).
The written language the books used were the same (Greek).

The Prophecy:
Matthew 24:14, "And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world(oikoumene) as a testimony to all(pas) nations(ethnos), and then the end will come."

The Fulfillment:

Colossians 1:6, “All over the world(oikoumene) this gospel is bearing fruit and growing, just as it has been doing among you since the day you heard it and understood God's grace in all its truth.”

Romans 16:25-26, “Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which has been kept secret for long ages past, but now is manifested, and by the Scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the eternal God, has been made known to all(pas) the nations(ethnos), leading to obedience of faith;”

For anyone to say Paul's words did not meet Christ's critera has a lot of dancing to perform.

-A

 
Upvote 0

armothe

Living in HIS kingdom...
May 22, 2002
977
40
51
Visit site
✟24,061.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Constitution
tel0004 said:
Paul and the apostiles never went to chinia, southern africia, Russia, and they didnt even know North American existed, so how would the gospel have been preached to them?

How do you know the gospel didn't reach those areas?

-A
 
Upvote 0
S

ShaggyFlasko

Guest
I don't however agree that Paul's definition and Jesus's definition of "World" are/were the same.

So...you believe that Christ's words corresponded more closely to our western, english mindset 2000 years removed from his ministry than to his inspired apostle. We understand more about Christ's prophecies than Paul?

I find this rather disturbing, to be honest (nothing personal). What do you base it on?

God bless.
-Bill
 
Upvote 0

HUBIE

A Blind Beggar
Sep 6, 2005
101
2
61
Bath, ME
✟22,731.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
ShaggyFlasko said:
So...you believe that Christ's words corresponded more closely to our western, english mindset 2000 years removed from his ministry than to his inspired apostle. We understand more about Christ's prophecies than Paul?

I find this rather disturbing, to be honest (nothing personal). What do you base it on?

God bless.
-Bill
Bill,

The only thing I can base it on is Historical writings. There is no evidence (Biblical or otherwise) that Paul new of any world extending beyond the mediterranean. Copernicus was the first to postulate a round world existing somewhere outside of the center of the universe.

It's obvious to me that Jesus knew the whole of what he was referring to. I've only postulated that he inferred the whole of the world as we know it, vice the limited grasp of how big the earth actually was in the first century. To add to my argument, Paul and the other Apostles believed Jesus was coming back in their lifetimes. I think that bolsters the position that the first century Christians had a very limited view of how big the earth actually was.

The only 1st century historical text that I know of that goes beyond the mediterranean with geographical references are the writings of Josephus and his world seems to extend from Modern Lybia and Portugal to the west to possibly the Tibetan region to the east. And even the areas he describes could be much smaller than that or significantly bigger, however they can't possibly extend beyond modern day North Africa, Eastern Asia and the Southern Euorpean Coast.

Well, that's my opinion. What is yours?
 
Upvote 0
S

ShaggyFlasko

Guest
HUBIE said:
Bill,

The only thing I can base it on is Historical writings. There is no evidence (Biblical or otherwise) that Paul new of any world extending beyond the mediterranean. Copernicus was the first to postulate a round world existing somewhere outside of the center of the universe.

It's obvious to me that Jesus knew the whole of what he was referring to. I've only postulated that he inferred the whole of the world as we know it, vice the limited grasp of how big the earth actually was in the first century. To add to my argument, Paul and the other Apostles believed Jesus was coming back in their lifetimes. I think that bolsters the position that the first century Christians had a very limited view of how big the earth actually was.

The only 1st century historical text that I know of that goes beyond the mediterranean with geographical references are the writings of Josephus and his world seems to extend from Modern Lybia and Portugal to the west to possibly the Tibetan region to the east. And even the areas he describes could be much smaller than that or significantly bigger, however they can't possibly extend beyond modern day North Africa, Eastern Asia and the Southern Euorpean Coast.

Well, that's my opinion. What is yours?

I appreciate the thoughtfulness of your reply. You speak very logically, which I like. :thumbsup:

Well, the first problem I have with your reasoning is the idea that the apostles were mistaken. If we are to give them any credibility, we must decide if they were writing by their own understanding or if the Holy Spirit inspired their words infallibly (John 16). If the latter isn't true, then Christianity is false.

Second, I freely admit that they didn't have a conception of the global earth, but rather referred to the Roman world. Where we seem to differ is on what Christ meant. Consider this, that Christ spoke to his contemporaries in the same language understood. To say that he spoke in according our language, culture and understanding of the 21st century doesn't make sense. In fact, it simply ignores the context of his ministry. He spoke to them in language that his first-century, Jewish audience would've understood. Paul, being a Jew of Jews, surely would've understood his words, especially with his strong background in Jewish religious thought and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (I mention that a lot, don't I?).

In the end, we basically have two options.
1. The inspired apostles misunderstood Christ.
2. We misunderstood Christ.

The evidence is strongly in favor of the apostles.

To add to my argument, Paul and the other Apostles believed Jesus was coming back in their lifetimes.

I'm not going to argue with them. :)


My opinion is that Christ and the apostles were of one accord, never contradicting each other. It is a mistake to take their words and apply them to our circumstances. Rather, it's more sensible to place ourselves within the bounds of the first century Jewish/Roman culture and try to understand their writings from their own perspective.

God bless.
-Bill
 
Upvote 0

NumberOneSon

The poster formerly known as Acts6:5
Mar 24, 2002
4,138
478
51
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟37,370.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ShaggyFlasko said:
Well, the first problem I have with your reasoning is the idea that the apostles were mistaken. If we are to give them any credibility, we must decide if they were writing by their own understanding or if the Holy Spirit inspired their words infallibly (John 16).
Exactly.

"I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come."

In Christ,

Acts6:5
 
  • Like
Reactions: visionary
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
HUBIE said:
Bill,

The only thing I can base it on is Historical writings. There is no evidence (Biblical or otherwise) that Paul new of any world extending beyond the mediterranean. Copernicus was the first to postulate a round world existing somewhere outside of the center of the universe.

It's obvious to me that Jesus knew the whole of what he was referring to. I've only postulated that he inferred the whole of the world as we know it, vice the limited grasp of how big the earth actually was in the first century. To add to my argument, Paul and the other Apostles believed Jesus was coming back in their lifetimes. I think that bolsters the position that the first century Christians had a very limited view of how big the earth actually was.

The only 1st century historical text that I know of that goes beyond the mediterranean with geographical references are the writings of Josephus and his world seems to extend from Modern Lybia and Portugal to the west to possibly the Tibetan region to the east. And even the areas he describes could be much smaller than that or significantly bigger, however they can't possibly extend beyond modern day North Africa, Eastern Asia and the Southern Euorpean Coast.

Well, that's my opinion. What is yours?

Copernicus was a product of the dark ages emerging in his own limited 'universe'. To claim that Copernicus' writings were the sum total of wisdom and experience and knowledge of the world being round is like saying no one believed in one God until Moses!


Eratosthenes: http://spaceinfo.jaxa.jp/note/shikumi/e/shi07_e.html
"The Egyptian Eratosthenes calculated that the Earth's radius is approximately 6,300 kilometers
Eratosthenes, who lived in Alexandria, Egypt in the 3rd century BC, calculated the radius of the Earth. In a papyrus book he noted that, "At Syene (in the present-day Aswan region), at noon on June 21st, a vertically standing pole does not cast a shadow." Concurrent with this experiment, he studied the shadow of a pole standing at Alexandria. This pole did cast a shadow. From this he postulated that "the Earth is round and its surface is curved." By measuring the lengths of their shadows, he determined that if the poles could be extended to the center of the Earth, they would intersect at an angle of 7 degrees (one-fiftieth of the Earth's total circumference of 360 degrees). He multiplied the 800-kilometer distance from Alexandria to Syene by 50 to obtain a figure for the circumference of the Earth: 40,000 kilometers. He was also able to calculate a figure for the radius of the Earth: 6,300 kilometers. Even using today's methods of calculation his figures are only off by a matter of a few percent, so he achieved a startling degree of accuracy for those times."

But Eratosthenes came after the ships of Tarshish were no longer the great merchants crossing the oceans as they had in their prime, trading between continents -and there is strong evidence that 'Chittim' is the western lands that were called the 'western continents', by maps drawn up in the first century showing the route to the western continents -the Americas.

Just because Paul didn't come to the western continents or speak of them does not mean that no one did, after all, America had great civilizations already that had peaked and broken apart by the time Jesus came to earth, and Nebuchadnezzar had ruled them and had sent his proclamation to all nations that YHWH was God -Daniel 4; and just because Paul did not speak of the western lands does not mean that no one traveled to them in his day -in fact, if you'll do a bit of research you'll find that at the time the vandals invaded north Africa in 450 AD, passage to the western continents was secured by Christians, who returned and left a document, written in stone, of the trip to the western continent and the return, to North Africa -I forgot which area exactly, but the document is in the book Saga america.

-and Nebuchadnezzar did in fact rule the American continents, according to the Word of God -for men, beasts, and fowl dwelt in the western continents when Nebuchadnezzar ruled the entire world.


Maps abound, writings abound, the Gospel came -and went, around the world and will again and again -until the end.
Better read Saga America and other such historically documented books, to see proofs of the travels of merchants from across the oceans to trade -and colonize the Americas.
And Cocaine has been found in Egyptian mummies -Cocaine is a south American product.


2Ch 9:21 For the king's ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.

Isa 23:1 The burden of Tyre. Howl, ye ships of Tarshish; for it is laid waste, so that there is no house, no entering in: from the land of 'Chittim' (western lands -not Cypress!) it is revealed to them.

Isa 66:19 And I will set a sign among them, and I will send those that escape of them unto the nations, [to] Tarshish, Pul, and Lud, that draw the bow, [to] Tubal, and Javan, [to] the isles afar off, that have not heard my fame, neither have seen my glory; and they shall declare my glory among the Gentiles.

Eze 27:12 Tarshish [was] thy merchant by reason of the multitude of all [kind of] riches; with silver, iron, tin, and lead, they traded in thy fairs.

Eze 27:25 The ships of Tarshish did sing of thee in thy market: and thou wast replenished, and made very glorious in the midst of the seas.

Jesus dealt with the nation of Israel, only, and sent Paul to the gentiles -although Timothy also went to India, it is said, and a 'Thomas' came and preached the Gospel centuries ago to a certain tribe in Peru -I think it was, who remembered it and were converted when modern missionaries came and made contact with them, because it was what they remembered, though their version of it was corrupted.

Bruchko's entire 'tribe' (that had no 'modern' contact with outsiders before Bruchko went to live among them), in Brazil (I think it was Brazil), was converted as they also were not strangers to the message of the Gospel -after Bruchko had a breakthrough in being able to share the Gospel after living among them for over a decade, last century. He still lives among them unless he has died.


Jhn 17:18 As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.
Jhn 17:20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;

Paul was an apostle to the Gentiles, and those Gentiles that He won were witnesses to other Gentiles and the Gospel went around the world, and continues to go around the world.
And I posted a link earlier that does indeed show the BC Greeks speaking of the 'round globe' and coinage that depicted it -just because I have never gone to the moon, I don't claim no one has.
If it isn't in my 'universal experience' I am not going to deny that it isn't in others' and in this instance, the Word does declare that the Gospel went round the world -in the first century.
 
Upvote 0

visionary

Your God is my God... Ruth said, so say I.
Site Supporter
Mar 25, 2004
56,978
8,072
✟542,711.44
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
If it isn't in my 'universal experience' I am not going to deny that it isn't in others' and in this instance, the Word does declare that the Gospel went round the world -in the first century.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Op's question has more to do with not your or others but the Lord's understanding of gospel preached to all the world. If the last two thousand years are any hint, the message has not gone out in its fullness. Revelation talks about opening seals and trumpets, so until they are finished, the mystery of God is not totally resolved in any one's mind, let alone the whole world's.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
visionary said:
If it isn't in my 'universal experience' I am not going to deny that it isn't in others' and in this instance, the Word does declare that the Gospel went round the world -in the first century.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Op's question has more to do with not your or others but the Lord's understanding of gospel preached to all the world. If the last two thousand years are any hint, the message has not gone out in its fullness. Revelation talks about opening seals and trumpets, so until they are finished, the mystery of God is not totally resolved in any one's mind, let alone the whole world's.
As other posters and I have pointed out; the Word of God declares that the Gospel went around the world in the first century.
That's just what the Word says.
And my quote on the 'my universal experience' is relating only to the geography of the world and who traveled where when.

There is ample evidence that there was trade between the continents, and there is biblical proof that the Olmecs -first 'known' civilization in Mexico -post flood of Noah- were ruled by Nebuchadnezzar, and that is just what the Word says.

For anyone who reads Christian biographys and missionary stories, there is plenty of proof that the LORD has always sent someone to those who are seeking the Light that lights every man that comes into the world, that they may be led on to the Salvation promised -actually 'proclaimed' before them, when He declared the Seed of the woman would crush the head (authority of sin and death) of the serpent- in the presence of our first parents, at the time of the fall; and all we who have come forth from the loins of the first Adam as the seed placed in his loins at the beginning were present, and were also given the promise of salvation, as seed who would come into our being from that seed, just as surely as Levi was in Abraham, as seed to come into his being, and paid tithes to Melche, King of Peace, through Abraham..

It is the Holy Spirit who directs the spreading of the Gospel in each generation of mankind, and who either leads on those who seek the Light lighting them when they come into the world, or blots the names out of the Book of Life of those who reject the light continously, until the heart is finally hardened as Pharaoh's was; or blots out those who just neglect the Light, never coming to the Light that they were born with to grope for more, or who have sought and known the Light and then deny that Light -and that blasphemy can never be forgiven and makes the punishment worse for eternity for those who do that, than for those who never had the full knowledge to deny. It would be better for them to have never been born, as the LORD said about Judas, quoting another prophet's words.

Salvation is an individual thing, a personal thing, and the call is personal, one at a time, for every single son of Adam who comes into the world: not one of them was predestined to be damned to a Christless eternity, but were all written in the Lamb's Book of Life from the foundation of the world and are the 'many' whom the YHWH of hosts, second Person, is come in human flesh to be the Kinsman Redeemer of and to lead to 'glory' as the redeemed sons.

Those who refuse by the above mentioned methods will be blotted out -and that is an individual, one at a time happening and has no remedy.

The Holy Spirit is not limited by geography, or chronology, or lack of internet, radio, tv, or any printed matter: the work is His and the inner thoughts of each and every person that comes into the world are fully known to Him and He always sends more light to those who 'grope' after the Light that they have -until they come to the saving knowledge of the Truth or reject the Truth and are then irrevocably blotted out of the Lamb's Book of Life and are not regenerated in the resurrection of the dead, then -in either the first or second resurrection.

Those who were never written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world are those foul, unclean, and uncleansable, unredeemable evil 'spirits' of the fallen angels and the daughters of Adam -for all Adam is one being, multiplied into the many persons from the first Adam, and the promise for redemption is to all Adam who were seed in the loins of the first Adam to come forth in their being, by the multiplication of the 'one' spirit, male and female, that God made him (Malachi 2:15), and to come forth as sons of God to fill the earth and inhabit it as home forever.

The redemption is for all in Adam, for whosoever will, and the Holy Spirit is always at work, drawing all in Adam to the Light that they come forth into their being with.

God so loved the world -not just a few here or there at this time or that time- that He planned the redemption of the human fallen sons of God -in Adam- from the foundation of the world, and there has never been a person born in Adam who has not had the Light that they must grope after or reject.

Not that all have heard the name of the Messiah, but that all have the Light when they come into the world, and seeking the Light, they are then led on to the Truth: rejecting the Light, they are blotted out of the Book of Life -even if they never understood all the Light and come to the knowledge of Salvation by being led: the rejection of the Light that they have condemns them in the Day of judgment, when the secrets of every man's heart will be revealed.
And that is the Gospel truth of the Word of God as I understand it from many Scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

HUBIE

A Blind Beggar
Sep 6, 2005
101
2
61
Bath, ME
✟22,731.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Yeshuasavedme, Bill,

You both make very sound arguments. For the record, I have never believed that the so called "New World" was discoverd by Columbus. Cultural heritage is too similar for these groups to not have had some acient contact with each other.

All of that aside, what then is the meaning (as you understand it) of the end coming after the Gospel is preached to all the world?

Thanks, Joe
 
Upvote 0
S

ShaggyFlasko

Guest
HUBIE said:
Yeshuasavedme, Bill,

You both make very sound arguments. For the record, I have never believed that the so called "New World" was discoverd by Columbus. Cultural heritage is too similar for these groups to not have had some acient contact with each other.

I agree, with this. Yesuasavedme, I'm going to look further into what you've said here so far. :)

All of that aside, what then is the meaning (as you understand it) of the end coming after the Gospel is preached to all the world?

Thanks, Joe

Well, I think that the "end" spoken of in Matthew 24 refers to the end of the Jewish economy and the destruction of Jerusalem (Matthew 24:1-3). As far as applying Matt 24:14 to a future, world ending event, I don't think it fits the context. Everything mentioned in Matthew 23-25 refers directly to the first century fate of the Jewish nation and Christ's followers, especially when compared to it's parallels in Mark and Luke (particularly Luke 21:20-22).

The Church was not fully established at that time because the temple and Jewish system were still in power, as Hebrews tells us (Heb. 8:13, 9:8). That system had to be taken out of the way for the true sons of God to be revealed.

God bless.
-Bill
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
HUBIE said:
Yeshuasavedme, Bill,

You both make very sound arguments. For the record, I have never believed that the so called "New World" was discoverd by Columbus. Cultural heritage is too similar for these groups to not have had some acient contact with each other.

All of that aside, what then is the meaning (as you understand it) of the end coming after the Gospel is preached to all the world?

Thanks, Joe
I can only understand it as that end of this age that comes when the LORD returns and restores all things, and dually, until the end of this present creation.
The Gospel will be preached until then.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Mat 28:20
Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

Bruchko is a good example of the Holy Spirit sending just one prson, without anyone else sending him or being there to help him, to a tribe in SA to bring the gospel to them. -BTW, I just looked him up and it was Columbia that he went to -as a 19 yr old boy!
Bruchko determined to go make contact with a tribe that had made no contacts with the outside world (in modern memory). There were no roads, no passages, and the tribe's wherabouts were not known; some people even doubted that they existed!

Yet; he did it and the LORD did many miracles to get him there and keep him alive and let him live in a tribe that murdered all outsiders, formerly.
By the time outsiders did make roads in the jungle and came by that tribe, the entire tribe was converted to the LORD (by the LORD) and Bruchko had taught the natives and they had established their own schools and 'hospitals'.

We know Bruchko's story, but I'm convinced that the Holy spirit has repeated the same over and over through the centuries.
http://www.bruceolson.com/english/texts/links.html

Another I think of is a monestary of Buddhist monks who lived in isolation in the mountains during WW2 in Tibet (I think), who had prepared hearts to receive the Word of the 'God who loves' because two of the monks were in a city once, on business for supplies, when they came across a scrap a tract with part of John 3, "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son that whosover believeth in Him should not perish but have everlasting life", and what they read gripped them and would not let them go.
They went back and reported that and they all decided if there was a God who loved the world that He would send someone to tell them about Him -and they waited -years! -but those 500 men received a woman who was mysteriously led to go to 'nowhere' with another man to preach the Gospel.
At the end of their trip -not knowing where they were going- they came to a dead end, sat down on their luggage and just sang hymns, not knowing what to do.
But unknown to them, there was a trail from the end of the road into the mountains, where a monastary was. One of the monks heard them singing about the God who loves, for whom they had waited to learn about, and came down from a mountain nearby and led them into the monastary in the mountain heighth, where they were brought before the entire monastary and given honor and asked to speak. They remained for several days and told the gospel story to eager hearts each day and answered questions each night.

Gladys Alyward was the woman, just a little uneducated 'parlor' maid who became a Believer, loved the Bible and her LORD and went to China to spread the gospel. She wasn't the first to go to China, nor will she be the last, nor do we know of all of them who have gone from around the world, to around the world, but the Holy Spirit has always sent people to spread the Gospel.
That story is in the book about her life and I may have mis-remembered some of it; but the monastary was overrun by the Japanese within a short time of her visit and she never knew what happened to 500 men in it.
She's in heaven and she knows by now.
http://www.traveltheroad.com/missions/missionaries/aylward.php

On the tribe that had received the gospel when 'Thomas' came centuries before modern times and were living a corrupted version of it in the mountains of ?Peru? -I watched a video online from a Creationist website, that spoke of it on a video dealing with another subject, and they had video footage of the home of those tribal peoples -and I have formerly seen pictures of the village, but I can't reference it at this moment -I'll research it, though, and get back.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.