Thank you. I feel little bit better about what you said now that you have provided the basis for your conclusions. So it is not that you are against visions , just against using those visions to trump the teaching of scripture and make those visions the basis for a person's authority in teaching ?
Youve raised a fair point and undoubtedly others might be thinking along similar lines. As a prelude to my reply, being that my theology is both highly Trinitarian and Pneumatic in nature this means that my theological expectations are that every Spirit led congregation is to ensure that the following God given functions/Offices (1 Co 12:28) are to be in place:
- Apostle, prophet, teacher, powers, healings, administrations, helps and tongues
Not only should the above 8 Offices be in place but the leadership of these Spirit led congregations should be ensuring that its members are being encouraged to seek after the following Manifestations of the Holy Spirit (1Co 12:7-11):
- Wisdom, knowledge, faith, healings, powers, prophecy, discernment, tongues and interpretation
Even though
dreams and visions are not
Manifestations of the Spirit they are still a very important method in which the Father uses to speak to individuals, though in a private manner, which in themselves cannot be verified by the congregation, unless the Spirit intervenes with some form of additional verification such as with a prophecy etc.
About 15 years ago I was heavily involved with a certain congregation and one night I had a very definite dream that I was to no longer remain involved with that church at least in the specific area that the dream related to. After the completion of the dream which certainly shook me up a bit, I quickly sat up after this dream and I had absolutely no doubt whatsoever that I was to immediately stop my involvement. A couple of days later I mentioned this to one of the senior members of this congregations leadership team but this left him in somewhat of a conundrum; now he knew that I was convinced with the validity of my dream but he understandably had no witness or connection to it and how could he as he was the number two staffer in this large congregation.
Now even today, I am completely convinced that this dream was from the Lord but with hindsight I was probably a bit unwise in telling him of this dream as I should have simply stated that I feel impressed by the Lord that I was to discontinue what I was doing without the need to play the so called God-card.
I also believe in the inner witness of the Spirit. In this case , I have to be honest and say I have no inner witness one way or the other about these two people. I have never heard of or listened to either one even once.
I took the subject of the thread, in practice, to be a more general discussion on these types of things than just limited to these two people ...So I gave my comments in that context.
From within my perspective, I am convinced that we should quickly dismiss any individuals claim to having visitations from the Lord (other than through a dream) and visits to heaven. As Oscar pointed out, the Apostle John was only given a vision where he was enabled to write down a major book of the Bible though I would disagree with him that Paul did not see Jesus face to face on the road to Damascus. If we only see the all-important Paul receiving a direct face to face encounter and with a later visitation to heaven, then who are we to make such wild claims.
I still think that I can detect a little bit of a skeptical attitude towards visions in your post. My question to you would be when and on what basis would a vision be acceptable? Are you against all visions or just the ones that seem to subvert scripture as the main authority in a believer's life?
When it comes to anyone who runs around making unsubstantiated claims that God has spoken to them through constant dreams, visions and through visits to heaven (along with an email address for future speaking engagements) then I have a complete confidence with discerning that they can be quickly disregarded and that we should not even give them the hand of fellowship.
I think that we could safely ask,
is a vision ever an acceptable witness when it is being used to justify someones actions or beliefs? To give an example, lets say that the Lord gave you a dream where it seems that you were to tell me that with the next book that I pick up that I am to turn to page 77 and it will say so and so. Now if you were used to experiencing these types of dreams then this would give you a degree of confidence with letting me know about the dreams content; if I were to then randomly pick up a book and it said exactly what you felt impressed to say to me then I would have little if any doubt that the Lord had used you to speak to me in this manner.
The problem we have is that you can never know if I am saying that your dream was correct simply to play along with a good story and what a great story it would be. So even though you spoke out in faith you could never be sure that I was simply just playing along but as I knew that your message was undoubtedly from God then I would definitely be well advised to carefully consider what had just occurred.
Now given that I was convinced that what you had to say to me was correct, it is still something that only I can have a strong witness to and I certainly could not use it to demand that someone else accepts my future actions simply on the basis of what I have claimed as how do they really know for sure that my account is true.