I am responding to several at one time and each one of you know who said what.
NASB Col 2:18 Let no one keep defrauding you of your prize by delighting in self-abasement and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, 19 and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God.
It is primarily the "newer" translations of the Bible that say "visions he has seen". The KJV says "that he has NOT seen". When I say "new", I mean the Wescott and Hort "inspired" translations. While they are useful in some areas, they actually change the meaning of the text in others. This is a prime example of the damage this causes.
You assume (even if they "did see" in the scripture), that they would have to be puffed up and of a fleshy mind to have it at all. And that worship of angels is somehow involved. That a "self-abasement" (religiously and not of God) is occurring.
They never said that of John or any of the believers in the OT (I'll bet some did though!). They just gave us what they saw or heard.
If any of us have the misfortune of walking into a congregation where is someone on the platform spouting out the foolishness that we hear from the likes of David E. Taylor or Kat Kerr, then we would be well advised to leave the building as soon as possible.
You wouild be well advised to leave if you're not hearing. It's one thing to be undecided, but you often rush to judgment --- which we are not supposed to do. Raise the banner of those who rush in! "Protect"the childlike who judge after the Spirit and bar the doors of those who would enter in based on the violation of your understanding of the Word. Very sad.
Unlike Taylor and Kerr, we can make no false claim to any extra-biblical 'special inside information' but we can rely on the witness of the Spirit of God within us which is why we can say with complete confidence that these two are simply charlatans of the worst order.
It slumbers not. Your path is paved with the pearls of trampled offerings of intended blessing for God's children. Won't you change your judgment on matters like this (this isn't the only one you've pegged a charlatan).
Do a life comparison. For those who would read it hoping for it to be of God, read the book. Look at what is being preached. Look at the life David is living and espousing. Look at the walk and degree of obedience and faith he is adovcating in ALL believers. Compare that to the fruits of those who would file it in the "liar" bin. All of the players should be plainly obvious. Judge it for yourself and do not be swayed by the spewing of the enemy.
<That a man can stand there and say Jesus promised a personal face to face visitation if you read his book . . . come on folks, wake up!! Smell the sales-pitch here! He says he was introduced to the Holy Spirit? People? Didn't he already have the Spirit dwelling in him? And how exactly does one 'meet' omnipresence?
He just said what Jesus us told Him. Yes you can speak to the Holy Spirit and He does often take on a form, however different.
You think that is is all about money. As Kat said, you make very little publishing a book. Kat self published because you literally hardly make anything. She doesn't market the book, accept on her website. People recommend her book and CDs to others. They go all over the world. She tells people to go ahead and copy the CDs. It's not about the money. It's about getting the Word out. In Kat's case, it's about repenting and getting ready and stop looking for a way out. In David's case, it's about beliving there is so much more in that John 14 scripture about Jesus manifesting Himself to you. You can have a deeper and higher walk. That you can actually see Him! Where's the sales pitch in that? I really hope your eyes open on these matters because otherwise you'll stay where you are now. That is really not a good place!
I don't want to stay where I am at either! I lay hold on books like Kat's and David's because I desire that kind of walk. I'm not walking in it and I want to. I want more! Revelations like these are intended to inspire the church to rise up and actually believe there is more. To believe our understanding of the Word can be more. That we can know Him intimately. Where's the sale pitch?
I guess I should stop trying to splash the water in the faces to wake them up and just let them suffer the consequences of following after these demonic deceptions. Jesus said it would happen, 'Lord, Lord, did we not . . .'
These are not demonic deceptions. I really only speak for those who wold otherwise be blessed. Read the book for yourself. Judge it by the fruits in your spirit, not the suspicions of those who would judge carnally.
I tell you there are many well meaning people on this forum calling themselves "believers" who work as the enemies of Christ. They oppose the blessing God desires for His own. They are trying to "protect" us from what God is telling us. That is the same thing the Pharisees did to "protect" the Jews from embracing their violation of their understanding of the scripture. Does anyone really want to be of this company?
When it comes to the likes of Kerr and this Taylor chappie, I am staggered that there are many who can be so easily conned – and sadly there are many who even despise the term ‘discernment’!
What is so said is that people hang out here on this forum and freely make judgments against anointed believers and their testimonies, "warning" people against receiving them and
using words like "discernment" to justify violating the royal law of love. To diss God's own family and to resist the Spirit of God. They absolutely terrify me.
It reminds me of the scripture where it talks about spots on your love feast. People you've got to change this around and not reap the intake of what flows so freely outwardly. That is the fruit of the judgment of God's house.
It's one thing to not be convinced. You might even suggest your reasons. But when you follow it up when final judgments accusing them of being deceivers and charlatans (you become that very thing).
You erase all doubt as to the origin of this "discernment". You actually promote the very thing you're dissing because the darkness is so evident. I really feel sorry for the depth of this blindness and the ease that it hangs out at this place of edification.
I still think that I can detect a little bit of a skeptical attitude towards visions in your post. My question to you would be when and on what basis would a vision be acceptable ?
No kidding! It must be because of the translation of this verse. God gives visions to His people just like He did in the Bible. This justifies having them. It does not mean that people are not out there deceiving and we do judge EVERYTHING we hear. But it is not the standard by which we weigh, and our knowledge of the Word is only a very small part.