Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, but now that Roe v. Wade is overturned, the detente between Catholics and Evangelical Protestants is no longer necessary and Catholics are being returned to the second-class status they enjoyed back in the 50sNot really. Protestants make up 34% and Catholics 23%. But theres around 32% of Christians without any specific denomination. I think evangelism is mainly Protestants.
That is a good thing, but it's not free enterprise, either.Ok so then I am not sure what you are talking about. But free enterprise as in being innovative and productive doen't seem like a bad thing in itself.
Btw trying to hijack this case in order to whine about supposed systemic racism is pathetic. You could have made ur own thread but u had to push ur agenda here. Absolute cringe. If u think u are gonna accomplish anything then u are sorely mistaken.The verdict is in. We now witnessing history. The first man to be elected President a felon
Please........
Make your excuses. Spout your conspiracy theories. Tell us how this makes him an even better candidate. Also comment on what sentencing will look like. Between his outbursts, his contempt of court flirtations, his addressing the jury when that's a no-no. What I want to hear about most is how corrupt the judge was when he was found guilty by a jury of his peers......
After you justify all of his felonies and inform us of the corruption of his judge and the court system in general. Let us know about the same courts' fairness as it relates to race because every known statistic shows the disparity. When you do that, please explain why this is a corrupt court and the courts that have created a disparity between blacks and whites when it comes to pulling citizens over, convicting at a higher rate, charging higher bail, and not approving bail as often as whites, and longer sentences for black who are in the same legal situation as whites and are convicted of the same or similar crimes.
Can't wait to hear from you.
Of course the anti-Trump are going to say that. I wouldn't expect anything different. Just like the Right think he has done good.If trump did a great thing, it would be his first.
Why, many people with criminal records have gone on to do great things. I would rather a person who may have done something minor criminally than someone who has a clean record and yet is secretly decieving people while pretending to be holier than thou.It is sad that this is even a possibility.
No, not the Catholic and Prostestant conflict again. I thought we got over that. This is another sign of the times, of the division between people, identity groups even with the Church.Yes, but now that Roe v. Wade is overturned, the detente between Catholics and Evangelical Protestants is no longer necessary and Catholics are being returned to the second-class status they enjoyed back in the 50s
Ok well then perhaps you better explain what it is and save me to keep guessing lol.That is a good thing, but it's not free enterprise, either.
So again, at what point do you think he's unsuitable? Assuming that you think that everything so far hasn't led you to that position.For me I don't think either candidate is ideal.
Right now, I think neither candidate is suitable. But then I am speaking from afar and I don't know how I would feel as a local, affected by local and wider issues. I have mostly voted by the long way where you can vote parties and independents by number individually.So again, at what point do you think he's unsuitable? Assuming that you think that everything so far hasn't led you to that position.
Yeah most successful business people make poor decisions you know.
Right enough to be a convicted felon based due to fraud he's "doing right", it appears.Sometimes they get a bit cocky. But at least he is out there in the real life and not a career polititians who would not know about running a business. He is worth 6.1 to 7 Billion and in the top 500 world most richest people. Must be doing something right.
I thought you were trying to discredit Trump because he lost money on some business deal. I was just saying some of the best business people do, because they have the type of personality that takes those risks more often.What does that have to do with Trump?
Yeah, see this is what I am talking about with identity politics. Its like a continual ad hominem being rehashed that doesn't address the content. Cannot see past the black mark, judging a person based on one thing only. Using this as a political weapon. Thats the identity politics that people don't like.Right enough to be a convicted felon based due to fraud he's "doing right", it appears.
Then charge them all.I guarentee you just about every successful business person has cooked the books at sometime.
That is certainly an odd way for a Christian to justify Trump's behavior. Is book-cooking not immoral?I thought you were trying to discredit Trump because he lost money on some business deal. I was just saying some of the best business people do, because they have the type of personality that takes those risks more often.
Yeah, see this is what I am talking about with identity politics. Its like a continual ad hominem being rehashed that doesn't address the content. Cannot see past the black mark, judging a person based on one thing only. Using this as a political weapon. Thats the identity politics that people don't like.
I guarentee you just about every successful business person has cooked the books at sometime.
So I guess you can't justify any ofhis wrongdoings so you go on the attack on a whole different topic. ClassyBtw trying to hijack this case in order to whine about supposed systemic racism is pathetic. You could have made ur own thread but u had to push ur agenda here. Absolute cringe. If u think u are gonna accomplish anything then u are sorely mistaken.
The OP posted “wrong”?Btw trying to hijack this case in order to whine about supposed systemic racism is pathetic. You could have made ur own thread but u had to push ur agenda here. Absolute cringe. If u think u are gonna accomplish anything then u are sorely mistaken.
now i say this to all parties at hand . what we need to be all on gaurd againstRight now, I think neither candidate is suitable. But then I am speaking from afar and I don't know how I would feel as a local, affected by local and wider issues. I have mostly voted by the long way where you can vote parties and independents by number individually.
That way you can give preference to whoever you think is worthy regardless of party. It may be a mix of Left, Right, Environmentalist, Family First, Country and Independent reps. That way it gives a balance of power. The only problem is you have to be careful because some of the minor parties preference the major parties and can be radical in their policies.
There have been some good candidates on both the Left and the Right. Years ago when there were not so many minor parties there was only the Left (labor) the Right (liberal/Conservative) which linked with the National Country Party (rural) and the Democrates. But the Democrates were not like those in the US. They were a bit of both. Their slogan was 'Keeping the B******S Honest' lol.
I use to vote for them most of the time. But I have voted for Labor (Left) in the 80's as they were good for the nation back then. The PM Bob Hawke was a character and good bloke who understood industrial relations. Keating his Treasurer went to my school lol and was a great treasurer.
Other than that I have voted for the LNP Liberal National Party what you would call Conservatives a bit like the Conservatives (Torries) in England as Australia runs on the Westminister political system. But I will vote for whoever I believe will do a good job regardless of identity and association. Fundementally I obviously have a Right leaning being that the Conservatives align more with Christian values.
If I was forced to pick a candidate for the US presendency I think I would lean towards Trump. Not necessarily because I like Trump more but more I dislike and worry more about the Lefts current trajectory in what it is doing to society, the economy, immigration and how I think Leftist ideology is becoming more radical towards Totalitarianism.
I wouldn't eitherWhy would I defend adultery on a religion forum?
What is Mushroom theology. Is it related to Shrooms lol.now i say this to all parties at hand . what we need to be all on gaurd against
is this mushroom theology and political ideals that has grown very large in the past decade .
It seems it is spreading far and wide and it is taking captive many a leader
and many a party . Now mushroom political theology is
the danger .
I am not condoning doing anything illegal. My point was the Left don't have any credibility either to be taking the moral high ground on this. They are just better at getting away with it.That is certainly an odd way for a Christian to justify Trump's behavior. Is book-cooking not immoral?
"Everybody does it so it's not fair to charge Trump with it just because he got caught."
Why Evangelicals. Is that something only applied to the US. As I don't think we have any Evangelicals here. Well at least in politics or power. But once again another fallacy and personal attack on a group, classic identity politics. Target the groups morals, their integrity rather than deal with the issues at hand.I knew Evangelicals were losing their Christian moral compass, but I never expected it to go as far as this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?