• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Got Myself In A Mess

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
63
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
Sp0ck said:
The first part I would recommend is being honest with yourself.

"I have never had an affair."

Actually, yes you have based the actions you just stated.

"Any chance we could get together again as friends? As more? "

You are married..Did I miss something here? As more??:scratch: Run away and never look back my friend. You also need to confess this sin to the Lord and your wife. Relationships should be based on honesty and integrity. Right now your's is lacking this trait.

Well said.
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
msjones21 said:
Perhaps you should stop using selective vision and actually read your Bible. It specifically mentions that if a woman becomes an adulteress that the man may obtain a certificate of divorce. Give the guy a break? What? Give him permission to cheat?
Right!, the Bible says what you and I have mentioned. Men don't have permission to cheat and women don't have permission to divorce men who cheat.
 
Upvote 0

EdmundBlackadderTheThird

Proud member of the Loud Few
Dec 14, 2003
9,039
482
53
Visit site
✟38,917.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
desi said:
Right!, the Bible says what you and I have mentioned. Men don't have permission to cheat and women don't have permission to divorce men who cheat.

Desi can you be more legalistic? You have to employee at least isagogics when looking at scripture. At the time when Jesus spoke, no woman, in any society could divorce a man. They were subjugated and treated much like property and zero rights. This is not the case today and the scripture would apply to either sex. There would have been no reason for Jesus to state that a woman could divorce a man, every last person there would have laughed, it just wasn't allowed. You would have a woman stay in a relationship with an unrepentant adulterous spouse? That is ridiculous and doesn't hold up at all. Why would you allow a man to leave but not a woman? That is both sexist and improper exegesis of the scripture in question.
 
Upvote 0

Vollkommen Warrior

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2003
727
6
Visit site
✟917.00
Faith
Christian
"Right!, the Bible says what you and I have mentioned. Men don't have permission to cheat and women don't have permission to divorce men who cheat."

That's rediculous. Here we go again with not being able to do anything one the Sabbath. The word is alive not dead in some cave. Jesus wanted us to use common sense. This is why we are not driving chariots on the highway.
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
flesh99 said:
Desi can you be more legalistic? You have to employee at least isagogics when looking at scripture. At the time when Jesus spoke, no woman, in any society could divorce a man. They were subjugated and treated much like property and zero rights. This is not the case today and the scripture would apply to either sex. There would have been no reason for Jesus to state that a woman could divorce a man, every last person there would have laughed, it just wasn't allowed. You would have a woman stay in a relationship with an unrepentant adulterous spouse? That is ridiculous and doesn't hold up at all. Why would you allow a man to leave but not a woman? That is both sexist and improper exegesis of the scripture in question.
I don't know what isagogics means, did Jesus know? Are you suggesting since man's laws changed Jesus's stance changed. Thats suggesting the tail waggs the dog!
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sp0ck said:
"Right!, the Bible says what you and I have mentioned. Men don't have permission to cheat and women don't have permission to divorce men who cheat."

That's rediculous. Here we go again with not being able to do anything one the Sabbath. The word is alive not dead in some cave. Jesus wanted us to use common sense. This is why we are not driving chariots on the highway.
Jesus never said we should use common sense, suggesting he did is an insult to him as common sense has been used to justify all kinds of evil things like divorce on demand, homosexuality acceptance, and abortion. If we did what Jesus said instead of rationalizing ways out of it we would be much better off as a socitey.
 
Upvote 0

William Nunn

Babies enjoy living too!
Jan 10, 2004
393
16
43
Kentucky
✟615.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
desi said:
Whatever. I repeat what Jesus says as it is written, call Jesus what you will at your own peril.

Yeah, but you always seem to forget about the parts saying that the husband is supposed to be caring and loving, that the wives have power over the man's body, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Vollkommen Warrior

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2003
727
6
Visit site
✟917.00
Faith
Christian
I have a family member like this. They think men are above women when it comes down to it. Then he tries to manipulate scripture to build his case. No one listens to him anymore. Men are not above women. I'd rather have a partner with a spine. Some men are simply intimidated by that you know. They even take it so far as to only partner with someone physically much shorter than them to be sure they are "superior" in every way. This is a false interpretation.
 
Upvote 0

EdmundBlackadderTheThird

Proud member of the Loud Few
Dec 14, 2003
9,039
482
53
Visit site
✟38,917.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The dynamin that is set out for a man and woman in marriage is a willing dynamic on both parts. First the woman should submit to her husband, but this is the most important part, as to the Lord. This is a willing submission not an exerted control by the husband. This submission is in the context as well of what the husband is supposed to do and we have to look at both parts to understand the dynamic. The husband is to love his wife as Christ loves the church. This is important as it says that the husband is the head of the wife. We have to take off our rose colored English glasses and look at the ideas presented in the Greek to understand this verse. The picture here is not one of control like we have when we think of the head of something. In the time this was written the head of something was thought of in relation to an animal like a cow. The head is out in front, a point man so to speak. When we look at these verses in context of each other and the ideas that original language meant to paint we get an entirely different picture than what we get taking them alone and in English.

The picture that is painted is one where the husband is out in front, the wife lets him be there, and he is willing to take the damage from any attacks on his family be they from our enemy Satan, the world, other believers, etc, etc. This is a spiritual leadership in a sense. We know that the marriage bed is all about equality by what is written elsewhere. We cannot look at these two verses alone and pull doctrine from them and expect to be anywhere near right.

When a woman is told that she should submit it is in a very specific manner...as to the Lord. This submission is one of respect and a willing submission. Never once are we told to force this submission, in fact we are told to love our wives as Christ loves the church. We are not always in submission to Christ properly and he forgives us and never stops loving us. Our love for our wives in the context of these verses is regardless of anything that they do. We are called to love as Christ does, this includes all the forgiveness and even a willingness to die for them so that they would not have to.

To all the the men that are irate at women not submitting, expecially if it is your own wife: I suggest you look and see if you have the love for her that Christ has for you. There is a whole beam, speck, eye thing going on here that you should address. Until we are capable of following the command on how we are to love our wives we really shouldn't be concerned about the status of their submission. In fact the command to submit is to the wives and them alone, it has nothing to do with us, it is between them and God!
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
William Nunn said:
Yeah, but you always seem to forget about the parts saying that the husband is supposed to be caring and loving, that the wives have power over the man's body, etc.
I know how a husband is supposed to be as well as how a wife is supposed to be. When either is wrong the other is not free to sin too. We are called to behave ourselves despite how others behave. Some of you seem to lose sight of holding ourselves to a higher standard as Jesus did.
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
cutekid 4 Jesus said:
Desi spouting his sexism and pedantic attitude towards the scriptures again ....grrr!
The scriptures speak for themselves. You seem to have a problem with how the Bible defines marital roles. If I am wrong you may want to use scripture rebuttle instead of secular drivel. Sticks and stones...
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sp0ck said:
I have a family member like this. They think men are above women when it comes down to it. Then he tries to manipulate scripture to build his case. No one listens to him anymore. Men are not above women. I'd rather have a partner with a spine. Some men are simply intimidated by that you know. They even take it so far as to only partner with someone physically much shorter than them to be sure they are "superior" in every way. This is a false interpretation.
If you read Genesis you will find your folly. If you deny Genesis your beef is with God, not me.
 
Upvote 0

desi

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
3,840
60
50
La Vista
✟4,540.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Answering your posts is like untying knotted thread. You take scriptural verses out of context, add secular groupthink, add some assumptions, then you toss it out and call it good.

flesh99 said:
The dynamin that is set out for a man and woman in marriage is a willing dynamic on both parts. First the woman should submit to her husband, but this is the most important part, as to the Lord. This is a willing submission not an exerted control by the husband. This submission is in the context as well of what the husband is supposed to do and we have to look at both parts to understand the dynamic. The husband is to love his wife as Christ loves the church. This is important as it says that the husband is the head of the wife. We have to take off our rose colored English glasses and look at the ideas presented in the Greek to understand this verse. The picture here is not one of control like we have when we think of the head of something. In the time this was written the head of something was thought of in relation to an animal like a cow. The head is out in front, a point man so to speak. When we look at these verses in context of each other and the ideas that original language meant to paint we get an entirely different picture than what we get taking them alone and in English.
The head is where decision and direction come from. The rest of the body follow's the head's will because the head makes the decisions for the best interests of the organism. If the body were to start going its own way without the head's leadership disaster would happen as it does when we leave Christ to pursue our own ends. So it is when a wife defys her husband to the detriment of the marriage.

flesh99 said:
The picture that is painted is one where the husband is out in front, the wife lets him be there, and he is willing to take the damage from any attacks on his family be they from our enemy Satan, the world, other believers, etc, etc.
They are one in marriage. Its not about the husband willing to take the damage, it is about him leading his marriage past it by living and leading his family according to God's will.

flesh99 said:
This is a spiritual leadership in a sense. We know that the marriage bed is all about equality by what is written elsewhere. We cannot look at these two verses alone and pull doctrine from them and expect to be anywhere near right.
It is a practical leadership as defined in Genesis. Marriage is not about equality, this is modern psychobabble. Marriage is man and woman joining physically and spiritually to please God.

flesh99 said:
When a woman is told that she should submit it is in a very specific manner...as to the Lord. This submission is one of respect and a willing submission. Never once are we told to force this submission, in fact we are told to love our wives as Christ loves the church. We are not always in submission to Christ properly and he forgives us and never stops loving us. Our love for our wives in the context of these verses is regardless of anything that they do. We are called to love as Christ does, this includes all the forgiveness and even a willingness to die for them so that they would not have to.
Christ does not tolerate our waywardness. He brings us back by many different means. 'There's no atheists in foxholes.' Our submission to him is willing but suggesting it is not induced by divine activity is in error, just like suggesting a man let his wife walk away is not congruent to how Jesus handles us.

flesh99 said:
To all the the men that are irate at women not submitting, expecially if it is your own wife: I suggest you look and see if you have the love for her that Christ has for you.
I would suggest such men ask themselves if they go to the lengths Christ does to get us back when their wives leave them or disrespect them. To do anything other than your best to maintain your marriage is not in keeping with how Jesus shows his love for us. When we leave Christ he does not sit idly back and watch us go, he does not beg us on his knees to come back, he does not ask us if it was his fault. He smiles sadly and starts the ball rolling so we eventually return to him, in greater need than ever for his love.

flesh99 said:
There is a whole beam, speck, eye thing going on here that you should address. Until we are capable of following the command on how we are to love our wives we really shouldn't be concerned about the status of their submission. In fact the command to submit is to the wives and them alone, it has nothing to do with us, it is between them and God!
NO! Husbands and wives are called to behave themselves despite how the other behaves. As Christians we are to hold ourselves to the standard the Bible sets despite how others treat us. That is the very thing which makes us Christ-like!
 
Upvote 0

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
63
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
desi said:
NO! Husbands and wives are called to behave themselves despite how the other behaves. As Christians we are to hold ourselves to the standard the Bible sets despite how others treat us. That is the very thing which makes us Christ-like!

Spot on. This cuts both ways of course. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Vollkommen Warrior

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2003
727
6
Visit site
✟917.00
Faith
Christian
That statment is a given to anyone who understands scripture. Still, that does not address the shovenistic remarks by this man and many others I see on many ocassions. We are all at different stages of growth I guess. Shovenists make it hard for everyone and especially hard on the woman. I have seen this happen and wonder why women take it from men and don't stand up for themselves. Some of them get physically and chronically ill from men like this. They suck them in pointing to scripture then falsely interpreting and/or physically intimidating. It is very sad indeed.
 
Upvote 0

hisbloodformysins

He's my best friend
Nov 3, 2003
4,279
217
46
✟5,464.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
You poor thing. I bet you'd like to get back with being friends with her for the intimacy (which you lack with your wife), and if you had the friendship back the way you wanted it, it'd probably lead to an affair.

But maybe not, maybe you could just be friends again, if she were willing, though the desire might always be there for you.

Sorry you're missing that closeness with your wife. I know how that is. It seems that is a common thing in marriages, that's when they're in danger.

God Bless and good luck.
 
Upvote 0