Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I didn't understand what he was saying about translations. He said the ESV is 91% RSV and all the problems associated with that, but what is the alternative that he or others use? Is it Luther's translation or NKJV? NAS?
edit: found my answer
christiannewsmo dot com/AAT.html
If you ever used the AAT for studying or reference you would say different. It is easy to understand and very accurate to the original languages and not a paraphrase. Otten only owns the rights to publishing it. Most of the proceeds go back to Beck's widow.Herman loves to hear himself talk. What you need to remember is that he owns the rights to the AAT and feels that the LCMS should have used it instead of the ESV (the translation and editing of which involved some LCMS scholars) for the new hymnal project. It's all very self serving.
Sorry, there are some of us who are an dial-up and can't tie up the phone line for hours at a time loading U-Tube. Could someone explain what's going on with Pastor Otten this time?
If you ever used the AAT for studying or reference you would say different. It is easy to understand and very accurate to the original languages and not a paraphrase. Otten only owns the rights to publishing it. Most of the proceeds go back to Beck's widow.
Christian News OnlineSorry, there are some of us who are an dial-up and can't tie up the phone line for hours at a time loading U-Tube. Could someone explain what's going on with Pastor Otten this time?
If you ever used the AAT for studying or reference you would say different. It is easy to understand and very accurate to the original languages and not a paraphrase.
You're just jealous because he has his own web page and a huge following and you don't.![]()
It's not only a proof reader but he also needs an editor to keep his comments and articles more focused. He actually writes, copies and does the layout for all the articles every week and this monumental task is overloading his paper. How in the world he does it every week for 45 years I'll never know. He has encyclopedic knowledge and photographic memory but he wanders in his articles. Sometimes its hard to know if he's advocating something when he puts in comments from other sources and posts blogs, letters and articles from opposing viewpoints. I've mentioned this to him but it's hard to get through to 45 yrs of ingrained publishing. I'm amazed how he runs the newspaper, publishing company and his church and does it successfully. IMOThank you for the link, Rad. I take it that Christian News is Herman Otten's publication? The man seriously needs a beta reader on his staff. His articles, though well done, are loaded with grammatical and typographical errors. Enough errors to be detraction to their message. If one is going to take on the liberals, one needs to do so in a way that doesn't make them look silly. Elsewise, outsiders won't take them seriously.
Reverend, I understand your side of this debate. However, you must admit that the liberals have usurped the leadership in the LCMS. Exactly what Otten predicted would happen. If you and other pastors continue to marginalize these voices of dissention to the liberal leadership, you will end up with an organization like the E*CA and wonder how you got there. These liberal Pastors must be defrocked! The lot of them should have been back during the Seminex scandal! A little leven levens the lump, sir, and these people have had forty years to work!
I think a great deal of Hermann Otten's combative style and bombastic writing comes from frustration. He has been fighting this battle from his years in seminary, thirty to forty years! The liberals keep making inroads to the leadership and, by all appearances, have won the field. That would make anyone in their right mind furious. Sadly, too many good pastors are advocating the gentle, peaceful, approach and have led the LCMS down the garden path. The Synod is in serious trouble from not rooting out the liberals in the first place!
Finally, the convention has elected a conservative president. Now, we can watch to see if he will do what's right, or what's convenient and comfortable, like his predecessors.
Reverend, I understand your side of this debate. However, you must admit that the liberals have usurped the leadership in the LCMS. Exactly what Otten predicted would happen. If you and other pastors continue to marginalize these voices of dissention to the liberal leadership, you will end up with an organization like the E*CA and wonder how you got there. These liberal Pastors must be defrocked! The lot of them should have been back during the Seminex scandal! A little leven levens the lump, sir, and these people have had forty years to work!
You know you guys have no idea what you are talking about. Otten has made a few mistakes just like you have and he usually retracts them in his newspaper. Talk about sinning against the eight commandment.Part of the reason that the liberals have had that leadership is because of Otten and his splitting of the conservative camp for so long. He's of the opinion that unless you agree 100% with his viewpoints then you are 100% liberal. We are now getting past his schismatic influence and the confessional side of synod is uniting again. The man has repeatedly misrepresented facts and published things that are out and out false. I certainly cannot find him credible in much of anything he says. And the majority of the confessional side of synod has seen this as well.
If you ever used the AAT for studying or reference you would say different. It is easy to understand and very accurate to the original languages and not a paraphrase. Otten only owns the rights to publishing it. Most of the proceeds go back to Beck's widow.
From what I remember God's Word is a branch off/knock off of AAT because AAT is such a good translation. I'm going to have to refresh myself on that info.
AAT is very good. There are errors in the 4th edition. I sent an email ~2 years ago to him and pointed out the one in Psalm 8. Also, the inaccurate translation in Ephesians 5:22. Never heard anything from him.
Actually the AAT was in revision starting in 1986; it was called God's Word to the Nations, then changed to New Evangelical Translation (NET), with the first NT published in 1988 and revised in 1992. It was excellent. But then the translation leadership and team changed and when it was published in 1995 as God's Word, it wasn't nearly as good. The best part of GW is the layout in which everything is single column (like AAT), but it is laid out according Hebrew structure. Unfortunately suggestions to revise the GW translation have fallen on deaf ears.
Actually a good combination is ESV/NAS/NKJV and AAT. AAT is better than GW and NLT and any other such translation on the market.
From what I remember God's Word is a branch off/knock off of AAT because AAT is such a good translation.
You know you guys have no idea what you are talking about. Otten has made a few mistakes just like you have and he usually retracts them in his newspaper. Talk about sinning against the eight commandment.
Instead of bashing him you could email him and tell him of his error and he WILL retract his statement.
My husband really likes reading the AAT bible. You can order it from NPH (WELS publishing house).
That's not true. Prove it. Again-----another eight commandment problem.I'm only stating facts. His errors have been pointed out to him by others. He's even printed such letters to him in his paper, but instead of correcting his errors, he belittles those who try to point them out to him.