• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

RIP Fourth Amendment (1791-2025)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
MarkSB

MarkSB

We’re all standing up now…
May 5, 2006
1,043
858
✟102,278.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Always in His Presence said:
  • The Supreme Court has long recognized that non-citizens may be detained for immigration purposes under a different legal framework than criminal suspects.
  • Civil detention for removal proceedings has been upheld when authorized by statute and carried out reasonably.
Click to expand...

"Different legal framework" is about as vague as it gets. And unless there was some monumental Supreme Court case that none of us are aware of, they still need a judicial warrant to enter a residence. The only exceptions are if they are in "hot pursuit" of a suspect, believe that someone is in danger, or if someone invites them in. Those rights can't be negated with a memo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Similar threads

essentialsaltes
Changing past guidance, ICE says its officers can forcibly enter homes during immigration operations without judicial warrants: 2025 memo
Replies
9
Views
416
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
essentialsaltes
essentialsaltes
essentialsaltes
Family seeks answers after ICE deported man to Costa Rica in vegetative state
Replies
5
Views
348
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Richard T
R
essentialsaltes
$915 million DHS "Self-Deportation" Contract to 2-year-old firm with no federal contractor history Challenged as Secretive and "Unlawful"
Replies
1
Views
4K
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Richard T
R
essentialsaltes
Military Veteran, US Citizens Detained in ICE raid in Newark, NJ - Mayor alleges Fourth Amendment Violation
Replies
400
Views
67K
American Politics
essentialsaltes
essentialsaltes
essentialsaltes
Brown University Doctor with H-1B visa held incommunicado at Logan airport for deportation after trip to see family in Lebanon
Replies
38
Views
4K
American Politics
Nithavela
Nithavela
Top Bottom
Jump to latest Follow Reply
Jump to latest Follow Reply