Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Incorrect. You yourself used the word "creation". You cannot assume that the universe was created. That implies a god.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
God's rule about solar systems.
- Thread starter Lazarus Long
- Start date
- Oct 29, 2017
- 64,803
- 10,752
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
Science Proves Creation Clicky
It's not an assumption.
Science Proves Creation Clicky
Your inferences do not equate to my implications.
Science Proves Creation Clicky
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
I clicked. Your link does not appear to help you in any way at all. And yes, you screwed up. You do not get to assume a creation.
Upvote
0
- Oct 29, 2017
- 64,803
- 10,752
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
Again, it's not an assumption. Heat death is real. The effects are observable.
Upvote
0
Multiple links to the same irrelevant post don't help make your case. Perhaps you meant to link to your OP in that thread? In which case the reference to a passage from the bible is the implication of a (very specific) god. It's the opening post, no inferences needed.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
If it was the first post it does not help you either in the use of the word "creation". By using that very biased term you take on a burden of proof. All that it seems that you have are unwarranted assumptions.
Upvote
0
- Oct 29, 2017
- 64,803
- 10,752
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
The bias is yours my friend. It seems that you would even reject science to satisfy your bias. You are strong in your faith. It takes more faith to reject the possibility of a creator; when the creation stands before you; than it does to suppose that creation came from a creator.
Upvote
0
Are you denying that you implied a biblical creation? That would be a very oddly dishonest claim to make.
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Please, you know that making false claims about others is a sin. You yourself used the word "creation". That is a highly biased term that puts a burden of proof upon you. It appears that you know that you have no evidence so you have to accuse others of your sins.
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
It does not even have to be a biblical one. There is no evidence for a creator and at a certain point scientists will properly say "We don't know yet" that is not evidence of a god or an excuse to use one. Could there be a god? Yes, but no one has found a rational reason to have one yet.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
