• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

God Is a Physical Being

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is what I tell people. Exegesis is difficult. A verse can often be interpreted in many different ways. Therefore your best friend, in exegesis, is the law of non-contradiction. If a logical contradiction surfaces in your conclusions, you can be sure that you interpreted one of the verses incorrectly.

Please re-read my post. It identified a logical contradiction in your thinking. Resolve that first, and then come back to this passage, seeking a different extrapolation/interpretation of it than the one you currently espouse.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,557
10,401
79
Auckland
✟440,364.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
With respect I start with the Word of God first.

The scripture is the 'gold standard'.

I have suggested this passage clearly speaks of a timeless order...

These are the words of Jesus that you said you believed.

I will leave it at that.
 
Upvote 0

Noxot

anarchist personalist
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2007
8,192
2,452
38
dallas, texas
Visit site
✟253,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
My logic is from heaven. Prove that your logic is from God. God's Logic is greater than man's logic. As near as we are to God shall our Logic be like Gods logic
And so those depending on heteronomy or autonomy have in some way already begun to reject *theonomy*. logic is only right in as much as there is a spiritual relation to God. your logic is nothing more than the collection of spirits that you have accepted as authorities.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
With respect I start with the Word of God first.

The scripture is the 'gold standard'.

I have suggested this passage clearly speaks of a timeless order...

These are the words of Jesus that you said you believed.

I will leave it at that.
Um...we ARE starting at the Word of God. The written Word claims that God doesn't merely ASK for praise, He is actually WORTHY of praise, in a word, He MERITS praise. Any doctrine that deprives Him of merit insults Him and robs Him of the glory.

But it's your call. You're the one who will have to face up to it on judgement day.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What material is God though? We dont know.
Right. We don't know.

Revelation 4:1-3
After this I looked, and there before me was a door standing open in heaven. And the voice I had first heard speaking to me like a trumpet said, “Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this.” 2 At once I was in the Spirit, and there before me was a throne in heaven with someone sitting on it. 3 And the one who sat there had the appearance of jasper and ruby. A rainbow that shone like an emerald encircled the throne.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Heavenly matter is so perfect that it cannot be compared to this fallen material that we call the physical. that things can harm each other and everything is always falling apart is proof of the inferior corruptibility of this flesh.
Are you claiming that it was created that way?

Saint Steven said:
Why not?
Was not the physical perfect before the Fall? God created it and said that it was "good".
Certainly seems that the physical "can be" perfect.
 
Reactions: JAL
Upvote 0

Noxot

anarchist personalist
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2007
8,192
2,452
38
dallas, texas
Visit site
✟253,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Are you claiming that it was created that way?

Saint Steven said:
Why not?
Was not the physical perfect before the Fall? God created it and said that it was "good".
Certainly seems that the physical "can be" perfect.
Matter that falls apart and degrades itself is due to going from a state of perfection to a lesser state. Sin is a spiritual condition of the spiritual world, it warps and disorganized perfect matter into imperfect matter. And so our universe is a bridge between Heaven and Hell. that is why there is such a profound Beauty in our world and yet at the same time torment.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't want to get off topic, so I'll just ask, how does all this effect your view of whether God is physical, or not?

To be clear, I don't think the choices are between physical and spiritual. I think we can all agree that God is spiritual, the question is whether the spiritual realm has a physicality to it, or not.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And your sense of humor brightened my day. Thanks again.
I was going to say something about the Apostle (when he was Saul) getting knocked off his horse. But the Bible-thumpers would have raked me over the coals, I suppose.

Saint Steven said:
I think what is being challenged here is the assumption that the spiritual realm is not material. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not solid. Like that car you didn't see coming, that put you in the ditch. - lol
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I have suggested this passage clearly speaks of a timeless order.
Here's the passage. I'm simply going to show you an alternative reading of it. Every verse has a context.

1For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham as he was returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him, 2to whom also Abraham apportioned a tenth part of all the spoils, was first of all, by the translation of his name, king of righteousness, and then also king of Salem, which is king of peace. 3Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.

See the words in bold? The context of his reference is the human lifespan. And thus 'beginning of days' most likely refers to the beginning of a human lifespan (natural birth). Whereas Melchizedek appears on the scene as a full-grown man. Had you asked him, "When's your birthday", He couldn't have named the year. There was no such year. The verse continues:


"...he remains a priest perpetually."

That's not atemporality. It's just perpetuity. Here was a singular priest - obviously very different than the run-of-the-mill Levitical priest. And he will remain a priest forever.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
With all that in mind, what is your answer to the OP question?
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It seems to me that we get hung up on the biblical language that tends to include exaggerated statements that should not be taken so literally. It doesn't make sense to me that a priesthood would have preceded the man it was named after. Just sayin'
 
Reactions: JAL
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,199
Vancouver
✟332,633.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The church father Tertullian (200 AD) was rightly a staunch materialist who realized that all of the biblical data - not just some of it, literally all of it - favors a wholly physical God.

What does it matter?


Does God have a physical body? | GotQuestions.org
 
Upvote 0

Noxot

anarchist personalist
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2007
8,192
2,452
38
dallas, texas
Visit site
✟253,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
With all that in mind, what is your answer to the OP question?
This entire universe is like a tiny bubble in the entirety of all of reality. Matter is much more than just what we know of it in our experience of this world. I look forward to my Celestial body because this fleshly body is a burden. The fleshly body is but the outer coating shell of a seed that grows up into the spiritual body either for shame or for Glory. I see no difference between my soul and my celestial body. but to exist in this universe I must have some kind of form that is in this universe.

I don't really see a difference in between the resurrected body of Jesus and the things that the Angels could do. They obviously have a superior form of matter that does not give them the torments that this matter can torment us with. I find it good that we as Souls have bodies, but bodies are just information so Souls are more fundamental to reality, because they are the container of information. matter is due to information, mind, and God's thoughts. Change the laws of physics enough and matter will be so different as to be unrecognizable. The laws of physics are but a few words and equations of the total Word that makes all things through himself.

The Flesh is a container of information and a medium to experience this kind of world with. It is for the sake of more permanent realities. This universe cannot persist in it's Fallen State forever. since God is outside this universe, there is already the perfected form of this universe but it is somewhere in God just like everything is in God. Space and time is only but a state of being, there are many kinds of states of being. God is eternal and the fundamental reality that all things are in. Thrones and glorious streets of gold exist in heaven, because reality is better with all these forms that we get to play with and enjoy.
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What does it matter?
Ultimately I want revival. I want to see the church restored to proper fruitfulness, I want the multitudes saved, the sick healed, and so on. The Platonic view of God has corrupted our thinking in ways suppressive of revival.
(1) As I mentioned a few posts back, we've deprived Him of the glory, for 2,000 years.
(2) Immaterialism blinds us to sanctification - the unsanctified consider themselves already sanctified. And this makes us even less likely to reform our doctrine and practice, because we assume that everything is copacetic. How does Platonism blind us to real sanctification? When we reduce God to an immaterial nothingness, then the definition of mature experience with God becomes - no experience at all! Nothing tangible! Here's what a mature experience with God looks and feels like:

"And the Lord spoke with Moses face to face, as a man speaks with his friend"

This is where the OT saints had a great advantage over us. Because they lived prior to Plato, they measured maturity only in tangible units, and sought God in tangible ways.
 
Upvote 0

Noxot

anarchist personalist
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2007
8,192
2,452
38
dallas, texas
Visit site
✟253,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
At one point Paul said that his Spirit was with some people that his physical body was not with. I myself have experienced this other world, which is the spiritual world that has its own kind of matter with its own "laws of physics". The best I can make of the OP is that he is calling the spiritual World matter. In that regard I cannot say he is wrong. But my body and All saved souls are part of God's body. God says he is what he is. His infinite nature means I will infinitely know him. he is forever filling me with himself and I am becoming ever more like he is. so I cannot say that God is only but a body. Souls are ideas of God. I am a figment of God's imagination.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,199
Vancouver
✟332,633.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private

I don't see how this particular thread subject point matters.

In itself is it not insignifiant. Like "how many angels can sit on a pin head?"

Is it going to affect any significant doctrine?

Does it affect how i should live my life?

Perhaps it would be better to focus on some points you think are significant re doctrine & Christian living?
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,499
1,331
72
Sebring, FL
✟836,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat



Maybe this quote will show what I am trying to say when I cannot agree that Tertullian ascribes a material nature to God. This quote is found a few pages into a piece called The Flesh of Christ, a few pages into Chapter 1. It is addressed to several Gnostics.

Tertullian:
“You have sometimes read and believed that the Creator's angels
have been changed into human form, and have even borne about so veritable a body, that
Abraham even washed their feet ...

... the Gospel of John, when it declares that the Spirit descended in the body of a dove, and sat upon the Lord. Matthew 3:16 When the said Spirit was in this condition, He was as truly a dove as He was also a spirit; nor did He destroy His own proper substance by the assumption of an extraneous substance. But you ask what becomes of the dove's body, after the return of the Spirit back to heaven, and similarly in the case of the angels. Their withdrawal was effected in the same manner as their appearance had been. If you had seen how their production out of nothing had been effected, you would have known also the process of their return to nothing.

Here Tertullian asserts his belief that angels do not have, and do not need, a material body when they are in heaven attending on God. Angels do sometimes assume a body when they visit the earth. This angelic body is created from “nothing” when it is needed and returns to “nothing” when the mission is over, by the will and power of God. Tertullian applies the same reasoning to the Holy Spirit descending on Jesus in the form of a dove. The body of the dove was created from “nothing” and returned to “nothing” when that manifestation of the Holy Spirit had accomplished God’s purpose.

Tertullian doesn’t see any need for this mysterious spirit-like-but-really-material substance that you talk about.
 
Reactions: public hermit
Upvote 0