So I'm just gonna reply generally to what I heard here and maybe I'll quote specific posts when I look at this again.
Faith is always "blind", I give you that. To have faith means you believe in the unseen, so every Christian must have faith because it's just one of those matters. I believe in God and being Good but I don't feel like I really need to uphold every single thing in the bible and/or can't question it. I feel for me that Christianity is for me a choice to live righteous but the bible is just a guide. I find it silly how alot of Christians I know talk about not being worldly as well. I like the world and I think Christians should be involved in worldly things like politics, education, media, any profession.
We live in a society now that is post-christian. Seperation between state and church or seperation between state and morality and I think this is silly but I also think it's silly how dogmatic christians are about things based on a book. Do you guys question if the stuff you read is factual, true, legit or do you just trust it because it says so? (Kinda rhetorical unless you actually do - it says we shouldn't what's up with that)
We have a point to discuss now.
That's a wrong speculation. In contrary faith is the only efficient way for humans to get to a truth of any kind.
Here are the examples on the various kinds of truth;
1) History
You can't evidence history, especially historical individual activities. We can trace a trail of some mass activities which are rare with the sites usually preserved by a fluke. Say, an earthquake destroyed a city then no humans lived on top of its land for thousands of years till now. Then we can examine the trails left to have a speculation on how a society behaved back then inside this destroyed city. This is a fluke as even when an earthquake destroyed a city, humans usually would rebuild it afterwards as a city is built in that location for a reason in the first place, say it has good soil nearby for crops or it's in the trade routes or it's near mines or near a fish-rich sea etc. That drives the rebuilding of the city on top of the same location. It subsequently overrides whatever trails left by the previous city.
Individual activities such as who said what or did what can hardly be traceable. You ate more than 10,000 meals by the age of 31, usually you can't evidence even one out of them. That's what history is regarding to individual activities. So when you try to tell people what you ate last Christmas most likely you can't back that up with evidence. Some said they have photos. First who knows whether that photo is taken on that exact day, perhaps it's a photo of a meal in a previous year. Even date stamps are not accurate. My dash camera often lost track of dates due to powered off for too long. Second, who knows whether you actually ate what the foods shown on the photos, perhaps you just took the photos without actually eating them. Others will have to rely on your tales/testimonies in order to get to the fact about what you ate. Your food contents can only be evidenced when we go back to the time and spot while you are eating, which is out of human capability to do so. People need faith to get to what you ate.
2) Science
Only scientists can have access to the expensive equipment to get to the evidence, say about the existence of black holes. All educated modern humans know for a fact that black holes exist. It means they get to this piece of fact not by evidence, but by the testimonies of our few scientists. We trust that their works are as what they said. Some said there are peer reports for you to examine. But the simple truth is, 99.99% humans don't examine scientists' works such as the peer reports before they know for a fact that black holes exist. They get to this piece of truth by faith instead of by evidence. You know that black holes exist, but you don't have the evidence unless you are one of the scientists professed in researching the black holes.
3) Daily events
We rely on our media to gather situations from eyewitnesses accounts to get to the daily occurrences surrounding the world. We put faith in our media to get to facts, instead of examining any evidence. Physical evidence won't come out of your LCD screen (which is the electronic pixels) or your newspapers (which are a paper with only some human writings on it). You need to go on site if you need evidence. Or else you have to put faith in the reporters and journalists as they are the experts in acquiring information by either themselves witnessed the situation, or by witnesses accounts they deemed reliable. We general folks will have to put faith in what they wrote and reported. You have the right not to believe though, like Trump said, "they made fake news".
4) Future
Humans don't have the ability to get to a future, especially the one advocated after our physical death. Again some argued that our science says nothing about afterlife. Well, 300 years ago our science never said anything about the existence of black holes, it by no means says the black holes didn't exist back then. It only means the existence of black holes was out of the reach of our science back then. Similarly, our today's science has no say because afterlife is out of the reach of today's human science. Basically, our science relies on experiments to confirm a truth. We can't go outside of our 3D space to go to another time-space to do experiments. While long before the emergency of our science, humans already defined that afterlife and the whole spiritual realm don't lie within our living realm. We and our science can't go there to establish experiments to confirm anything. People tried to detect paranormal activities with electronic equipment though.
Unless the dead humans can return to tell us (even so it is in a form of human testimonies the same as claims about the encounters of aliens), the only way left for humans to get to what could possibly lying beyond our physical death is through a God who knows and is willing to tell us. What left is how we can identify the existence of such a God. The next, if such a God has a good reason to hide behind then the only way left for His message to convey is through human testimonies, the same way as mentioned above on how our history, how our science and how our daily news are conveyed. The Bible is formed by those who encountered God then wrote down His words as a testimony for the rest of human kind to believe with faith.
When Trump said that, "You made fake news". What does this mean? It means human testimonies are a two-edge sword. They are a vessel conveying truths for humans to get to, and at the same time they can convey lies. However to humans this vessel remains the only way (only efficient way even if not the only way) for the majority to reach a truth of any kind. It invites faith in order to get to a truth. If you follow Trump to reject all news, you have no truth. Simple as that.