As your peer, I have reviewed you claims and they don't stand up.
Now . . . as my peer, you reviewed my claims and also dismissed them.
Hmmm. What shall we do, since peer review has failed us?
Examine the evidence!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As your peer, I have reviewed you claims and they don't stand up.I don't care what you think, your not a scientist. So my peer review stays.
As your peer, I have reviewed you claims and they don't stand up.
Now . . . as my peer, you reviewed my claims and also dismissed them.
Hmmm. What shall we do, since peer review has failed us?
Examine the evidence!
As your peer, I have reviewed you claims and they don't stand up.
Now . . . as my peer, you reviewed my claims and also dismissed them.
Hmmm. What shall we do, since peer review has failed us?
Examine the evidence!
now your desperate.
I know. Evidence means nothing to climate science deniers, but it's all I've got . . .
Climate change denial - Wikipedia
wikipedia is error prone, please use a website that is not open source.
wikipedia is error prone, please use a website that is not open source.
peer review is honestly the strongest case you can make.What would be the point? Every site with which you disagree becomes, in your mind, an error, regardless of evidence or reasoning.
Do you have peer review? then it's not happening.Here's a site showing that increased acidity in the oceans is even now affecting marine animals.
Searching for the Ocean Acidification Signal
Indeed, right now, "the shells of sea butterflies in Antarctic waters are dissolving". Go ahead, tell us how you are certain that's not really happening.
Cold cycles are natural. Like the ice age. warming cycles too are natural. but what I haven't seen is peer review evidence that man is causing global warming.
Well it can say it all it wants, we need to actually see the peer review abstracts.Gosh, it says here that peer reviewed studies overwhelmingly support the human caused global warming hypothesis.
Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility: Only 1 of 9,136 Recent Peer-Reviewed Authors Rejects Global Warming
besides, it does not say that those peer review authors even wrote peer reviews in official climate change journals and works. It just says, basically that a 9,000 scientists (which could be of various backgrounds), accept climate change. And I would agree with them. Climate does change, just not as a result of man.Gosh, it says here that peer reviewed studies overwhelmingly support the human caused global warming hypothesis.
Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility: Only 1 of 9,136 Recent Peer-Reviewed Authors Rejects Global Warming
besides, it does not say that those peer review authors even wrote peer reviews in official climate change journals and works. It just says, basically that a 9,000 scientists (which could be of various backgrounds), accept climate change. And I would agree with them. Climate does change, just not as a result of man.
So let me get this straight. If you are shown a peer reviewed article that asserts climate change is happening driven by activities of our species . . . . you will then accept that climate change is happening driven by human activity?
check out:
Satellite Images Reveal How a New Island Was Born Off North Carolina
It has to do with shoals and currents. And it can go away very quickly. It is not proof that there is no global warning.
What journal was the study in?
What you provided was a pdf linked in a news article.
exactly, more islands being born not due to global warming.
Yes, it matters what journal it was in. The editorial boards of those journals are there for more than "cataloging" research. They evaluate the research for quality and ethical standards. They do not allow badly done research, and provide feedback.journals are just for cataloging and not to prove it a peer review. If I did track down what journal it was in, you still would not believe and find another way to disprove it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?