As your peer, I have reviewed you claims and they don't stand up.
Now . . . as my peer, you reviewed my claims and also dismissed them.
Hmmm. What shall we do, since peer review has failed us?
Examine the evidence!
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Global Warming
- Thread starter Theokayman1
- Start date
Now . . . as my peer, you reviewed my claims and also dismissed them.
Hmmm. What shall we do, since peer review has failed us?
Examine the evidence!
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Soros Gave $20.7 Million to Alleged Russia-Funded Climate Groups in US
more democrats colluding with russia here:
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/
Last edited:
Upvote
0
I know. Evidence means nothing to climate science deniers, but it's all I've got . . .
Climate change denial - Wikipedia
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
wikipedia is error prone, please use a website that is not open source.
Upvote
0
What would be the point? Every site with which you disagree becomes, in your mind, an error, regardless of evidence or reasoning.
Upvote
0
Here's a site showing that increased acidity in the oceans is even now affecting marine animals.
Searching for the Ocean Acidification Signal
Indeed, right now, "the shells of sea butterflies in Antarctic waters are dissolving". Go ahead, tell us how you are certain that's not really happening.
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
peer review is honestly the strongest case you can make.
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Cold cycles are natural. Like the ice age. warming cycles too are natural. but what I haven't seen is peer review evidence that man is causing global warming.
Upvote
0
Gosh, it says here that peer reviewed studies overwhelmingly support the human caused global warming hypothesis.
Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility: Only 1 of 9,136 Recent Peer-Reviewed Authors Rejects Global Warming
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Well it can say it all it wants, we need to actually see the peer review abstracts.
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
besides, it does not say that those peer review authors even wrote peer reviews in official climate change journals and works. It just says, basically that a 9,000 scientists (which could be of various backgrounds), accept climate change. And I would agree with them. Climate does change, just not as a result of man.
Upvote
0
So let me get this straight. If you are shown a peer reviewed article that asserts climate change is happening driven by activities of our species . . . . you will then accept that climate change is happening driven by human activity?
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
yeah, thats how it works. But it has to be newer than the peer review I already posted negating some of the figures of your peer reviews.
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
exactly, more islands being born not due to global warming.
Upvote
0
createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
journals are just for cataloging and not to prove it a peer review. If I did track down what journal it was in, you still would not believe and find another way to disprove it.
Upvote
0
- Oct 17, 2015
- 15,722
- 16,445
- 82
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Unorthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
Yessir! As the water levels rise parts of the mainland will become islands.
Upvote
0
- Jul 2, 2003
- 152,131
- 19,760
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Yes, it matters what journal it was in. The editorial boards of those journals are there for more than "cataloging" research. They evaluate the research for quality and ethical standards. They do not allow badly done research, and provide feedback.
You provided the paper they wrote - no evidence whatsoever that it was peer reviewed at all. What "peers" reviewed it? That is what 'peer-reviewed' when it comes to research means - it was reviewed by a group of scholarly peers from the same field for quality and ethics.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
