Raising voice =/= screaming. Beck's voice got shrill, something completely unexpected from a figurehead IMO. Raising your voice is justified in special cases, but those cases are very special. In fact, this is the only time I've seen anyone of any repute act this way.
Re Barry Goldwater: That depends on what you're moderating. If you're moderating your views, I agree - RINOs are poisonous to conservatism. If you're moderating discourse, I do not agree - that episode is only likely to polarize further. I'm tired of the polarization; I want civil discussion between honest folks.
Of course, if someone's being dishonest a harsh rebuke may be necessary, but even this must be restrained so the other side (or even your own side) doesn't pass you off as a lunatic. It should be obvious that you're respectable despite your anger.
And I'm not arguing against passion, but passion must be restrained for the sake of civility. I've had my own flare-ups online, but (I think) I've managed to express both anger and civility in my posts. Ideally a speaker would bite his tongue enough to do the same.
Plus, if this woman is just a liberal troll who wanted to cause problems for Beck as you seem to think, I think it worked...
Re Barry Goldwater: That depends on what you're moderating. If you're moderating your views, I agree - RINOs are poisonous to conservatism. If you're moderating discourse, I do not agree - that episode is only likely to polarize further. I'm tired of the polarization; I want civil discussion between honest folks.
Of course, if someone's being dishonest a harsh rebuke may be necessary, but even this must be restrained so the other side (or even your own side) doesn't pass you off as a lunatic. It should be obvious that you're respectable despite your anger.
And I'm not arguing against passion, but passion must be restrained for the sake of civility. I've had my own flare-ups online, but (I think) I've managed to express both anger and civility in my posts. Ideally a speaker would bite his tongue enough to do the same.
I would be very surprised if you understand the liberal arguments, given how you regard this angry, misinformed, obnoxious liberal. Beck would have to dissect her argument more before I'd believe she was lying. Plus he never accused her of lying, just of being an idiot.No, I can conclude that they're lying, because they say, "We see", and yet they're still blind. That's tantamount to lying.
If they can't see what people are saying, while asserting they know what people are saying: they're lying.
Yes, he retained his capacity for logic but repelled those we want to hear it - liberals and soft-core conservatives. If his show is addressed to hard-core conservatives, I say he's wasting his time preaching to the choir.He's continued to be rational.
Hot water with the FCC? Huh? But yes, she was quite thick-headed, although he didn't set the standard for ethics very well from the start. But I think she's just daft, and needs to be refuted by someone she'd actually listen to. She might not accept the truth at first, but hopefully it will eventually sink in.She's lying about him, getting him in hot water with the FCC, and not getting anywhere in her thinking process. She deserved what she got.
Plus, if this woman is just a liberal troll who wanted to cause problems for Beck as you seem to think, I think it worked...
Last edited:
Upvote
0