• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Given the current state of politics

WordofGod

True LOVE never Fails and Casts out fear.
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2006
8,301
7,110
The best country in the world.
✟107,459.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think Huck stands a chance, Romney is out. I can't in good conscience vote for McCain or Clinton or Obama.


I'm voting for Alan Keyes.
Do you want your vote to count for God and man?:)
 
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I need to cast a vote that allows me to have a clear conscience....a vote for McCain, Clinton, and Obama do not allow that.

I care little for the opinions of men, my vote must honor God and the convictions He has placed on my heart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LogosRhema
Upvote 0

mont974x4

The Christian Anarchist
Site Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
17,630
1,304
Montana, USA
Visit site
✟69,115.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I would have, but we had no primary here...just a caucus that allowed less than 1900 people to decide who got out 25 delegates. Mitt won and since he has suspended his candidacy instead of officially dropping out, those votes stay his for now.
 
Upvote 0
Well, this election is one of the weirdest in history I think. I mean, Hillary is just plain mean to Obama, and Obama is like a question mark. McCain seems much more reasonable than Romney because Romney has flip flopped far more. Huckabee deserves a pat on the back for being consistent, but I don't think it would be wise to put him in office because of the one thing he said about changing the Constitution. Whenever someone on the right or left says anything about changing the Constitution, beware of them.

Being a libertarian, I'm stuck in the middle. Lucky me.

The abortion issue for me is tricky, because there are so many situations that arise with young kids having sex and not being taught the basics. I would venture to say that most pro-choice people would prefer there to be reduced abortions, and hopefully no abortions, but they don't believe it is the government's job to make a girl have a baby if she would be traumatized by such a thing like from rape or incest. If abortion is made illegal, then, women will resort to horrific practices to get it done, rather than in a sanitary, medical facility.

China is a perfect example of what happens when you are not pro-choice. They FORCE women to have abortions, rather than having a choice. And if abortion is made illegal, then it is the exact same situation reversed. Women would be FORCED to have babies rather than having a choice. Either way, they'd be forced to lie half-naked on a table against their will.

We need to find a solution to abortion I think, but making it illegal will only make it go underground. The best solution is prevention, via sexual education and birth control. Abstinence only education is a sure fire way to increase abortions, since it fails most of the time. The odds of a sexually active girl getting pregnant while using birth control and condoms is very low, which would prevent pregnancy, and thus abortion. So, the pro-choice people would win and the pro-life people would win.

But, the pro-life people who refuse to teach kids about safe sex which would prevent pregnancy are being unrealistic. Sexual drive is more powerful than a promise of staying abstinent.

Just remember, when you criminalize human vices, then criminals will control them.
 
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Well, this election is one of the weirdest in history I think. I mean, Hillary is just plain mean to Obama, and Obama is like a question mark. McCain seems much more reasonable than Romney because Romney has flip flopped far more.

No, they are all weird.

Every election we are given the choice between two people who no one in their right mind would ever invite into their own homes.

The only person who was a president that I would ever let cross my thresh hold would be Jimmy Carter. Not because he was a great president, but because he is a great man.
 
Upvote 0

MrJim

Legend 3/17/05
Mar 17, 2005
16,491
1,369
FEMA Region III
✟50,122.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's fun to sit back and watch the whole thing happen. I have practiced safe politics (abstaining) since 1984, don't participate in the process for personal and scriptural reasonings, but it sure is fun to watch~especially the expression "politics makes for strange bedfellows". I was listening to Dobson being interviewed by Glenn Beck yesterday...strange bedfellows indeed ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sageoffools
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
It's fun to sit back and watch the whole thing happen. I have practiced safe politics (abstaining) since 1984, don't participate in the process for personal and scriptural reasonings, but it sure is fun to watch~especially the expression "politics makes for strange bedfellows". I was listening to Dobson being interviewed by Glenn Beck yesterday...strange bedfellows indeed ;)
By bedfellows do you mean harlots ?

I can certainly agree to that.
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,919
Vancouver
✟162,516.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
The lesser of two evils... is still evil

One should never choose the lesser of two evils, for that would be still opting for evil.
It is the lessening of evil that is the correct choice.

With so many Supreme Court appointments on th eline in the next few years, there is no doubt what kind of choices Barrack and Hillary would make. But if a Republican president actually beats the odds and gets elected, he will not be able to do wo without owing a debt to support from conservative Christians.
 
Upvote 0

MrJim

Legend 3/17/05
Mar 17, 2005
16,491
1,369
FEMA Region III
✟50,122.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But if a Republican president actually beats the odds and gets elected, he will not be able to do wo without owing a debt to support from conservative Christians.

Politicians aren't too good on the whole "remembering debts" thing:D
 
Upvote 0

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,577
27,116
76
Lousianna
✟1,016,631.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I voted for Huck today in the LA primary and considered it no big deal since the process is pretty much over statistically.

I also voted against adding another Casino here in BR.

But the cool thing about today is the phone will stop for a while. The robo calls have been horrific.
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,919
Vancouver
✟162,516.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Politicians aren't too good on the whole "remembering debts" thing:D

Marx was wrong. Apathetic cyncism is is the opiate of the masses.
On the other hand, ask anyone who knows them from the outside. Ask any liberal, for example.
The Christian right is as obnoxious as any group in politics has ever been.
And in politics, it is the squeaky wheels that get the grease.
As far as Democrats go, the Christian right will be locked out of the room. But if any Republican manages to get elected, he will be locked into the same room as the Christian right. As far as the Christian right goes, it is better to be on the inside than on the outside.
 
Upvote 0

edie19

Legend
Site Supporter
Sep 5, 2005
20,810
10,316
69
NW Ohio (almost Michigan)
Visit site
✟136,291.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Every election we are given the choice between two people who no one in their right mind would ever invite into their own homes.

The only person who was a president that I would ever let cross my thresh hold would be Jimmy Carter. Not because he was a great president, but because he is a great man.

Overall I agree with you - but to be honest, I bet current President & Mrs. Bush would be pretty darn fun to have at the dinner table.

Agree about Jimmy Carter too - never loved his politics (I remember >20% mortgage interest rates), but he is undoubtedly a great humanitarian (Habitat for Humanity is one of the greatest philanthropies out there)
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,919
Vancouver
✟162,516.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Hmm, well Clinton and Kennedy, I guess you would have to watch carefully around your sisters and daughters if they ever did step into your home. Reagan and Ford by all accounts were very fine people, even if their father were an alcoholic and a dead-beat dad respectively.

Nixon turned out to be rather foul-mouthed and obnoxious, but they say that George W Bush is a very warm and funny man in person.

Jimmy Carter is the one person out of the bunch that seems to be the most offensive to me.
 
Upvote 0