• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Geology help please

ChordatesLegacy

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2007
1,896
133
66
✟32,761.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Nah, actually, your earlier post was good for me, as the Burgess Shale searches alone yielded some great pictures describing the life found there, as well as a few comparisons between modern ecosystems. Know of any other famous fossil beds that provide images of a similarly alien ecosystem from a different time frame? If at all possible, I'd like to leave, at this point, pesky details like dating out of the equation, and just focus on the alien nature of specific fossil beds.

Look up Lagerstatten's

Lagerstätten (sing. lagerstätte) are fossil localities which are highly remarkable for for either their diversity or quality of preservation; sometimes both. Sometimes the phrase konservat-lagerstätten is seen in all its polysyllabic glory, though this seems like somewhat pretentious over-kill to me.

Here’s a LINK to a table of the best Lagerstatten’s world wide
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟43,653.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Look up Lagerstatten's

Lagerstätten (sing. lagerstätte) are fossil localities which are highly remarkable for for either their diversity or quality of preservation; sometimes both. Sometimes the phrase konservat-lagerstätten is seen in all its polysyllabic glory, though this seems like somewhat pretentious over-kill to me.

Here’s a LINK to a table of the best Lagerstatten’s world wide
Oh, that's superb! Thanks!
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
43,134
20,799
Finger Lakes
✟350,104.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I dont see why you should worry about convincing someone the earth is ancient; tell them to take a university geology course if they REALLY want to know the facts and truth.

I took a geology course; I'm pretty sure the professor wouldn't lie about the earth being billions of years old.

You don't just pay a thousand dollars for a credit hour to be mislead by professionals an hour of your day.

lol
Tell that to the Scientologists.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,141
6,837
72
✟396,761.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Well, I hope to show the precise age, but he believes it to be thousands of years (10,000 at the outside).

Oh, of course I plan to make use of radiometric dating. I just don't need any help with that, as I think I understand it well enough to describe it effectively, as well as provide evidence.

The next question is how stubborn the person is and what they think the initial state of the Earth was. One can easily take the Grand Canyon and show it took far longer that 10,000 years to form. But if he thinks the Earth was created with it already in place the argument dies. Same for any radiometric dating method.

Now if you can get him to say the Grand Canyon wasn't always there you can easily sshow there is no way (short of magic) for that much material to get removed in 10,000 years.

Put in a different way, what you are likely going to have too do is destroy his model of how the Earth and things on it got to it's present form. To do that you need to know how he says it got as it is now.
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟43,653.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
The next question is how stubborn the person is and what they think the initial state of the Earth was. One can easily take the Grand Canyon and show it took far longer that 10,000 years to form. But if he thinks the Earth was created with it already in place the argument dies. Same for any radiometric dating method.

Now if you can get him to say the Grand Canyon wasn't always there you can easily sshow there is no way (short of magic) for that much material to get removed in 10,000 years.

Put in a different way, what you are likely going to have too do is destroy his model of how the Earth and things on it got to it's present form. To do that you need to know how he says it got as it is now.
Well, we shall see. As near as I can tell, his beliefs on the subject are a little bit vague. So, it'll be interesting when I finish this essay (I'll post on this forum as well when I'm done).
 
Upvote 0

Baggins

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
4,789
474
At Sea
✟29,982.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Chalnoth; google image Ediacaran fauna if you want something older and stranger than the Cambrian fauna. The very first multicellular life forms show strange symmetries. They look Lovecraftian.

The Carboniferous faunas are good as well due to the giant size of the insect fauna, this was down to the high levels of oxygen in the atmosphere from all those photosynthesising plants, gave us Dragonflies the size of birds.

Later faunas all look familiar as they tend to be quadrapeds of some from or another running around on land.
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟43,653.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Chalnoth; google image Ediacaran fauna if you want something older and stranger than the Cambrian fauna. The very first multicellular life forms show strange symmetries. They look Lovecraftian.
Hmmm, that's some great stuff, too. Looks like Mistaken Point, Newfoundland would be a good fossil bed to reference from this era.

The Carboniferous faunas are good as well due to the giant size of the insect fauna, this was down to the high levels of oxygen in the atmosphere from all those photosynthesising plants, gave us Dragonflies the size of birds.
Will definitely have to give those a look. Also, the carboniferous was before the advent of flowering plants, right?

Later faunas all look familiar as they tend to be quadrapeds of some from or another running around on land.
Yeah, but still should be a good contrast. Now I just need to get to work writing this essay! (first, though, I'm going to beat Mass Effect again...fun game :) )
 
Upvote 0