Geological Layers do not represent fewer years than we conclude

[AV1611VET]

Nope.
Try again.

If one inch represented 6025 years, then evolution says its 35.89 miles.

I would say stretching one inch to almost six miles is ... well ... stretching it.

 

[Mr Laurier]

If one inch represented 6025 years, then evolution says its 35.89 miles.

Nope.
Try again.
Evolution says NOTHING.
It is a mute process

 

[AV1611VET]

Nope.
Try again.
Evolution says NOTHING.
It is a mute process

Blind too.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Blind too.

And?
Your point is?

 

[AV1611VET]

And?
Your point is?

Science is myopic.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Science is myopic.

Not at all

 

[AV1611VET]

Not at all

Good.

Name one of the stars at the very edge of the physical universe.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Good.

Name one of the stars at the very edge of the physical universe.

What?
You know that the physical edge of the universe, cannot be observed. You know that... yes?
It is so far removed from us, that we cannot see, or detect, any of the stars that far out.
So none of the stars in that region, have names.
You are asking me to resort to a lie

 

[Larniavc]

Good.

Name one of the stars at the very edge of the physical universe.

Which edge?

 

[AV1611VET]

What?

That's right.

Name one of the stars at the physical edge of the universe, or admit that science is myopic.

You know that the physical edge of the universe, cannot be observed.

I sure do.

Do you?

If so, admit that science is myopic.

You know that... yes?

I do ... yes.

But do you?

It is so far removed from us, that we cannot see, or detect, any of the stars that far out.

Science must be myopic then.

So none of the stars in that region, have names.

Actually they do, but you wouldn't understand.

If I quoted the pertinent verse to support it, you'd just see "a wall of blue text."

That's what people suffering severe myopia see.

The colors -- not the words.

 

[AV1611VET]

Which edge?

Any edge.

(I think it's just one single edge though.)

 

[Mr Laurier]

That's right.

So why demand the impossible?

Name one of the stars at the physical edge of the universe, or admit that science is myopic.

Given that science is in no way "myopic"

I sure do.

Then why demand I do so?

Do you?

Given that I BROUGHT IT UP IN THE FIRST PLACE

If so, admit that science is myopic.

Given that science is not in any way "myopic", what is there to "admit"?

I do ... yes.
But do you?

Again... I BROUGHT IT UP IN THE FIRST PLACE

Science must be myopic then.

How so?

Actually they do, but you wouldn't understand.

Try me.
Tell me the name of any one star that is beyond the range of human observation.

If I quoted the pertinent verse to support it, you'd just see "a wall of blue text."

Facts do not come in verses.
Post the name of a star that is beyond the reach of human observation.
Not a "pertinent verse". A NAME

That's what people suffering severe myopia see.

No. They do not.
STOP LYING!
Yes AV, I'm done pretending that your incessant lies are anything but.

The colors -- not the words.

No. They see a blur. But you already knew that. And you lie incessantly to try to fool anybody into believing your nonsense

 

[AV1611VET]

So why demand the impossible?

To show that science can only see so far, and not any further.

Given that science is in no way "myopic".

I could say "blind," but science isn't blind, per se.

She can only see to a point, then everything else is on paper.

Toilet Litmus paper.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Name one of the stars at the physical edge of the universe, or admit that science is myopic.

I name it "Fred-47". So there.

 

[AV1611VET]

I name it "Fred-47". So there.

They've already been named.

But you wouldn't understand.

But for those who would:

Psalm 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.

 

[Hans Blaster]

They've already been named.

But you wouldn't understand.

But for those who would:

Psalm 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.

There is really no evidence that Universe has a physical edge. If you knew this you wouldn't ask such inane questions. (Or maybe you would.)

 

[AV1611VET]

There is really no evidence that Universe has a physical edge.

You guys and your evidence.

Where is it, when you want it?

 

[Hans Blaster]

You guys and your evidence.

Yes. We really do like evidence. And there is none for an "edge" to the Universe. The question was therefore nonsensical. So, I gave a nonsense answer.

Where is it, when you want it?

Speaking of incoherent questions. This seems like two that got stuck together with somewhat imprecise pronoun usage to go on top.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yes. We really do like evidence. And there is none for an "edge" to the Universe. The question was therefore nonsensical.

Yes, I know.

If you can't see it in your telescopes or microscopes, it doesn't exist.

Missing links though?

No problem.

Just gloss over them with a blue line.

 

[SelfSim]

Yes, I know.

If you can't see it in your telescopes or microscopes, it doesn't exist.

I can see an horizon when I look out to sea. If I use binoculars, or a telescope, I can still see it.
I therefore know what an horizon is.