Someone thousands of years ago wrote something that in no way looks like a modern scientific truth unless you interpret the wazoo out of your thousands of years old text. E.g. trying to match 'was created' with 'emerged from a non-living world through natural processes.'. The two don't match up as well.
Genesis 1:21 tells us that "every living creature that moveth" was created and brought forth from WATER. Recently scientists confirmed what only God could have told us more than 3k years ago. It's proof (along with many other scientific truths) of the Literal God.
Before Science announced this fact in 2016, some claimed panspermia and others preached that life rode in on a comet and other idiotic notions. The reason Scripture and Science do not agree in your view is caused by your false idea of what Genesis teaches.
It is of course easy to create a completely unconvincing refutation of ToE. How about you try moving up a step and try to come up with something that has any believability about it at all. Can you do it?
Sure. Would you like to know HOW prehistoric people on our planet inherited the superior intelligence of God? Or do you hate anything which shows that God is real? I understand your fear since I used to run from Divinity students who wanted to save everyone. Amen?
Last edited:
Upvote
0