- May 5, 2017
- 5,611
- 3,999
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
I dont know about you, but I never seen a bear be anything other than a bear, have you?
So you are saying only things that we actually experience in our lifetimes can be considered real?
So much for your bible tales! More self-foot-shooting from the creationist camp!
Seems you are the one in need of rescue with your ad-hoc make believe common ancestors that you cant find on any single tree where these made up ad-hoc splits are to have occurred.
Yet another creationist that thinks it is not ridiculous to pontificate on things they do not understand.
So precious how you co-opt words I used to try to formulate a counter argument, except that maybe you don't know what those words mean?
Because the 'splits' are anything BUT 'ad hoc'.
..... yes, rescue your dead theory with imaginary non-existent common ancestors. Whatever it takes to rescue the theory, right?
Well, I suppose I could just claim it is all hybridization from identical breeding pairs like you do...
But you see, the problem with indels, is that in order for something to be deleted, it must first exist. So basically the fact that every animal undergoes indels, just shows they were once more genetically diverse than they are now.
LOL!
My gosh... That literally makes no sense at all - that is almost as inept and absurd as claiming that inbreeding pairs create new species by mixing pre-existing alleles!
Stick to making models, pal.
Upvote
0