Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"if all the mass m of the universe were converted into energy, space time would disappear. Energy takes up no space, and both time and space are only defined when mass exists."
at no point does this statement imply space time and matter is the effect of a big bang transformation of pre existing energy. What it does imply is that Energy takes up no space, which is completely untrue. Sure, for us to define terms we need to exist in material form, but an electromagnetic wave would have a wavelength, and effective mass regardless of us existing to observe the fact. The equation E=MC2 basically observes that mass is energy. Matter is bound in space, when the Energy is liberated it takes up more space. Time and space would still exist if all the matter were annihilated, since we define both time and space in terms of electromagnetic radiation.
"if all the mass m of the universe were converted into energy, space time would disappear. Energy takes up no space, and both time and space are only defined when mass exists."
at no point does this statement imply space time and matter is the effect of a big bang transformation of pre existing energy. What it does imply is that Energy takes up no space, which is completely untrue. Sure, for us to define terms we need to exist in material form, but an electromagnetic wave would have a wavelength, and effective mass regardless of us existing to observe the fact. The equation E=MC2 basically observes that mass is energy. Matter is bound in space, when the Energy is liberated it takes up more space. Time and space would still exist if all the matter were annihilated, since we define both time and space in terms of electromagnetic radiation.
I disagree since the seven layers of the firmament we call our Atmosphere end with the Exosphere, or that boundary where Outer Space begins:
The Firmament above
1) Tropo-sphere
2) Strato-sphere
3) meso-sphere
4) Thermo-sphere
5) Iono-sphere
6) Magneto-sphere
7) Exo-sphere
Some energy has mass, Cupid.
And you need to learn the difference between mass and matter.
As you have been told befor, there are 5 principal layers of the atmoshere. The ionosphere is not a principal layer, and the Magnetosphere is the region surrounding a planet where the planet's magnetic field dominates. It's not actually an atmospheric layer (not temperature or composition related), but it does couple with the ionosphere due to the nature of magnetic fields and ionized particles.
The point is that these layers are within the 5 principal layers. If you are going to count the layers other than the 5 principal layers, you should probably not leave out any so it isn't misleading anyone to think that these layers magically add up to 7.
8) Ozone layer
9) heterosphere
10) homosphere
11) planetary boundary layer
It is probably not all that importnt but certainly Energy is not mass, even though one can be transmuted into the other.
The Atomic Bomb was the evidence that mass diappears as enormous energy appears in its place, in quantities that can be predicted by E = mC^2.
And, since Energy is actually defined as an ability, we can see that no Space/time would be necessary to contain it.
But, to be more mathematical in this observation, once ZEnergy appears in Space/Time it is called Power.
Power, E/t, is the measure of energy over the time it is operating,
?
REALLY...?
We can measure the POTENTIAL energy in terms of mass, but the seven different forms of kinetic energy acting at any moment has no mass.
We can see this clearly in that the photon mass must be zero or it would not always be traveling at the speed of light.
Don't just google, put on your thinking cap...
1) The "planetary boundary layer" is the part of the troposphere
google: Atmosphere of Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2) The Homo and Hetero layers refer to how well mixed the component gases of a layer are mixed together.
3) The ionosphere, the part of the atmosphere...
google: Atmosphere of Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(It has practical importance because it influences, for example, radio propagation on the Earth. It is responsible for auroras.)
4) The ozone layer is contained within the stratosphere and is not a sphere but one of the 12 gases found in the atmosphere.
Energy is mass, Energy equals mass multiplied by a constant. If light had no mass it would have no problem escaping the gravitational potential well of a black hole, it would not deviate from it's path when travelling close to large celestial objects. However it does !
Power is the rate at which energy is generated or consumed, it is a measure of the rate at which work is done, and is the first differential of Energy with respect to Time. Not a measure of energy over the time it is operating, which is actually the action of a system, and is the integral of energy over time.
And since Energy is defined as the ability to move, Energy could not exist without space and time.
Energy is mass, Energy equals mass multiplied by a constant. If light had no mass it would have no problem escaping the gravitational potential well of a black hole, it would not deviate from it's path when travelling close to large celestial objects. However it does !
Power is the rate at which energy is generated or consumed, it is a measure of the rate at which work is done, and is the first differential of Energy with respect to Time. Not a measure of energy over the time it is operating, which is actually the action of a system, and is the integral of energy over time.
And since Energy is defined as the ability to move, Energy could not exist without space and time.
Ahem... from the link you gave, which says nothing to the effect of what you posted....
"The stronger the gravitational field, the more energy the photons lose..."
So, yes, Cupid, photons are affected by gravity.
Regarding a blackhole, a photon is slowed down even just passing by a black-hole and gravitons must escape a black hole, so this "all roads must lead back to the black-hole" doesn't explain how gravitons, which are massless, are an exception, while photons are not..
The obvious explanation is that the photon has mass.
Photons are particles with no mass, is a presumption and unproven.
The theory of relativity is just that, a theory. Until theories are proven, they remain theoretical. Since we cannot prove (yet) that photons have no rest mass, the best we can do is assign an upper limit to the mass.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?