• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Genesis, a historical book?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
59
✟30,780.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
True, it really is a waste of time if you are thinking you could convince someone who is deadset against being convinced on theological grounds. But it is still very much worth combatting the YEC teaching for all those reasons I posted in my "Why I Post" thread.

And, Micaiah, the Epic of Gilgamesh is both very long (too long to be posting here) and easily accessible. I am sure you can read many translations of it on the internet or in any library.
 
Upvote 0

herev

CL--you are missed!
Jun 8, 2004
13,619
935
60
✟43,600.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Vance said:
True, it really is a waste of time if you are thinking you could convince someone who is deadset against being convinced on theological grounds. But it is still very much worth combatting the YEC teaching for all those reasons I posted in my "Why I Post" thread.

And, Micaiah, the Epic of Gilgamesh is both very long (too long to be posting here) and easily accessible. I am sure you can read many translations of it on the internet or in any library.
Since our friend Micaiah hasn't taken the time to define "plain" surely he won't take the time to study the Epic of Gigamesh, will he?
 
Upvote 0

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
59
✟30,780.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You know, the Epic of Gilgamesh is kind of like the Big Bang, Christians can't decide whether it helps or hinders. On the one hand, it has a VERY similar flood story (one man surviving, etc), and at first, some Christians were saying "see, look, here is independent evidence that the flood occured, they just got the details wrong!". Then others, realizing that it was written down before the Hebrew flood account was written down, began to worry that it looked as if the Hebrews (since Abraham came from Ur and the area was very influential over whole near east) might have adopted the Gilgamesh flood and rewrote it for themselves. So, then it was a bad thing, or at least something they had to work with. Both texts are from oral traditions, so the literalists can just say that Abraham brought the true version with him, and the Sumerians just remembered it badly. Or that God maintained His hand on the oral tradition until it was written down, keeping it "pure".

There is also a garden and a deceiving snake.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.