• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Should cannabis be legalized?


  • Total voters
    11

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello everyone. I'm curious to know how you feel about Cannabis use. I have written an essay that I'd like to share with you. Hope you enjoy!

"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat." Genesis 1:29

Those are the very first words that God spoke to mankind. He told us that He Himself made every herb, and He has given us every single one of them.

Cannabis being legalized isn't just about the fact that the Controlled Substance Act is grossly unconstitutional, that mothers and fathers are going to prison and having their children ripped from their homes, that Congress abuses the Commerce Clause to tell us what we cannot have in our own homes and bodies, or the countless lives that have been destroyed because of the failed War on Drugs. Cannabis is a God given right.

The governments tell us God was wrong; that He made a mistake. Why should anyone, whether they support legalization or not, stand for such a thing? Cannabis laws have nothing to do with helping anyone, nor do they have to do with money. The government uses cannabis to invade the rights of everyone. The DEA has put GPS tracking devices on vehicles, they have intercepted millions of American's phone calls, they can open your mail, and they can search your home or car without a warrant by simply saying, "It smelled like marijuana".

The Commerce Clause of the Constitution says that Congress has the power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes". From this single sentence, Congress created the Controlled Substance Act. This is how it works:

Congress has the authority to control "interstate commerce", or commerce between state lines. Commerce within state lines, or "intrastate commerce" is supposed to be regulated by the individual States. However, Congress says that it is not feasible for law enforcement to know whether cannabis is being sold or was obtained through interstate commerce, so they regulate the intrastate commerce as well.

In 2002, Angel Raich's home was invaded by DEA agents who destroyed her six medical cannabis plants. Raich took this to the Supreme Court, claiming that her plants were for personal use and obviously did not affect interstate commerce. The Court disagreed, stating that in Wickard vs. Filburn (1942), the Court had decided that growing wheat for one's personal use was within Congress's power to regulate. This essentially means that Congress has the authority to prohibit absolutely anything. If they wish to prohibit chairs, you cannot have a chair for personal use. They may also ban all materials used to "manufacture" chairs. This is not just about "drugs". This is about our rights and liberties as American citizens.

The Controlled Substance Act says cannabis, or "marihunana" as it's called in the Act, is a Scheduled 1 substance along with heroin and LSD, which means it has no acceptable medicinal value. However, Patent 6630507 is the U.S. Govenment's own patent on the various cannabinoids present in cannabis. The government is lying, and millions of people are forced to use prescription drugs which have rampaged Kentucky and the country.

Yet alcohol, which must be manufactured and has destroyed countless lives, is sold and celebrated all over the country. The Scriptures have plenty to say about alcohol and why it is wise to avoid it. When God made all the plants on the third day, before there was ever a man to till the ground, cannabis grew without any help. There is no need to "manufacture" cannabis. It's a plant!

Some will say "But it's against the law of the land!" Nonsense. The law of the land is that God made all plants and herbs, because the very first words that God said to man is "Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed".

God made it, and He made it for you. He made it because He loves you. He made it to bring you health, wellbeing, and to supplement your endocannabinoid system, which He also made. Nobody has the right to tell you that you can't have that which God explicitly said is yours.

"He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth" Psalm 104:14

Thanks for reading.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Jim Langston

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hello everyone. I'm curious to know how you feel about Cannabis use. I have written an essay that I'd like to share with you. Hope you enjoy!

The Federal Government is not currently enforcing cannabis laws due to lack of support
for enforcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Langston
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Federal Government is not currently enforcing cannabis laws due to lack of support
for enforcement.
This is true in states that have legalized cannabis, but it still remains a Scheduled 1 Substance, and many states have yet to allow for medicinal use. The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of1961 still lists cannabis as a Scheduled 1 Substance as well, which means the U.S. is currently in violation of international law. Many countries still hold very harsh laws for cannabis use. Also, many churches have quoted Paul for years to claim that cannabis is bad because it's against the law. Rather than stand up for what God has made, they have sided with the governments to say God was wrong and made a mistake. Why aren't the churches on the forefront of getting medical cannabis legalized everywhere?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Langston
Upvote 0

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟52,691.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello everyone. I'm curious to know how you feel about Cannabis use. I have written an essay that I'd like to share with you. Hope you enjoy!

"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat." Genesis 1:29

Those are the very first words that God spoke to mankind. He told us that He Himself made every herb, and He has given us every single one of them.

Cannabis being legalized isn't just about the fact that the Controlled Substance Act is grossly unconstitutional, that mothers and fathers are going to prison and having their children ripped from their homes, that Congress abuses the Commerce Clause to tell us what we cannot have in our own homes and bodies, or the countless lives that have been destroyed because of the failed War on Drugs. Cannabis is a God given right.

The governments tell us God was wrong; that He made a mistake. Why should anyone, whether they support legalization or not, stand for such a thing? Cannabis laws have nothing to do with helping anyone, nor do they have to do with money. The government uses cannabis to invade the rights of everyone. The DEA has put GPS tracking devices on vehicles, they have intercepted millions of American's phone calls, they can open your mail, and they can search your home or car without a warrant by simply saying, "It smelled like marijuana".

The Commerce Clause of the Constitution says that Congress has the power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes". From this single sentence, Congress created the Controlled Substance Act. This is how it works:

Congress has the authority to control "interstate commerce", or commerce between state lines. Commerce within state lines, or "intrastate commerce" is supposed to be regulated by the individual States. However, Congress says that it is not feasible for law enforcement to know whether cannabis is being sold or was obtained through interstate commerce, so they regulate the intrastate commerce as well.

In 2002, Angel Raich's home was invaded by DEA agents who destroyed her six medical cannabis plants. Raich took this to the Supreme Court, claiming that her plants were for personal use and obviously did not affect interstate commerce. The Court disagreed, stating that in Wickard vs. Filburn (1942), the Court had decided that growing wheat for one's personal use was within Congress's power to regulate. This essentially means that Congress has the authority to prohibit absolutely anything. If they wish to prohibit chairs, you cannot have a chair for personal use. They may also ban all materials used to "manufacture" chairs. This is not just about "drugs". This is about our rights and liberties as American citizens.

The Controlled Substance Act says cannabis, or "marihunana" as it's called in the Act, is a Scheduled 1 substance along with heroin and LSD, which means it has no acceptable medicinal value. However, Patent 6630507 is the U.S. Govenment's own patent on the various cannabinoids present in cannabis. The government is lying, and millions of people are forced to use prescription drugs which have rampaged Kentucky and the country.

Yet alcohol, which must be manufactured and has destroyed countless lives, is sold and celebrated all over the country. The Scriptures have plenty to say about alcohol and why it is wise to avoid it. When God made all the plants on the third day, before there was ever a man to till the ground, cannabis grew without any help. There is no need to "manufacture" cannabis. It's a plant!

Some will say "But it's against the law of the land!" Nonsense. The law of the land is that God made all plants and herbs, because the very first words that God said to man is "Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed".

God made it, and He made it for you. He made it because He loves you. He made it to bring you health, wellbeing, and to supplement your endocannabinoid system, which He also made. Nobody has the right to tell you that you can't have that which God explicitly said is yours.

"He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth" Psalm 104:14

Thanks for reading.
images
 
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Check out this article from the Southern Baptists...

www.bpnews.net/47842/marijuana-legalization-on-9-state-ballots

"Tommy Green, executive director of the Florida Baptist Convention, called for pastors to encourage church members to vote against the state's medical marijuana initiative.

Writing on behalf of the convention's State Board of Missions in late September, Green said the board empathizes with those suffering from debilitating diseases but does not "believe legalizing an addictive drug without strong regulatory oversight is an appropriate solution."

"[T]he effort to legalize marijuana is contrary to the interests of the public health, safety and welfare, and will adversely affect the rights of citizens to live and work in a community where drug abuse is not accepted and citizens are not subjected to the adverse effects of the drug abuse," Green wrote in a column published in the Florida Baptist Witness, the convention's newsjournal."

What?!? It's a plant. This is beyond any sort of logic to me.
 
Upvote 0

RaymondG

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2016
8,546
3,815
USA
✟277,185.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have no judgement on the use of cannibus. I do, however, believe that religious groups should not try to force their beliefs on the government. What if a religious group different from yours felt that the government should force all woman to cover their face because their religion requires it? They would have the same arguments as you...."what? our God said to cover and the government says he is wrong?"

This is a slope best avoided. For now, the bible says to follow the laws of the land...so we should respect it and maybe hope that it changes for the betterment of everyone and not just our personal belief systems.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
65
Left coast
✟100,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Check out this Q&A I submitted on stackexchange. I quote Marley at the end. I don't really agree with his theology, but he's definitely one of my favorite philosophers.
Technology has definitely improved to the point and I received something of an education on the matter with my wife's prescription at a legal "dispensary" that the dosage, of even very isolatable chemicals found within the plant, can be quite controlled and suggested doses with careful attention of how the patient reacts makes the situation very different from the 'Reefer Madness" movies (see youtube) days.

Having said that much, will also note that even the "medical person" giving my wife the legal prescription said these drugs, like many drugs, can fry your brain especially if abused. In her opinion and for that reason alone, the young who lack a fully formed brain (into 20s for most males) should avoid this drug as usage before the brain is fully formed is strongly suggested to interfere with that process and the youth are also most likely group to abuse it.
 
Upvote 0

1213

Disciple of Jesus
Jul 14, 2011
3,661
1,117
Visit site
✟161,199.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hello everyone. I'm curious to know how you feel about Cannabis use. I have written an essay that I'd like to share with you. Hope you enjoy!

"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat." Genesis 1:29....

It says, for food, not for smoking. :)

I think it would be better to avoid using drugs. But I think people should also be free.
 
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have no judgement on the use of cannibus. I do, however, believe that religious groups should not try to force their beliefs on the government. What if a religious group different from yours felt that the government should force all woman to cover their face because their religion requires it? They would have the same arguments as you...."what? our God said to cover and the government says he is wrong?"

This is a slope best avoided. For now, the bible says to follow the laws of the land...so we should respect it and maybe hope that it changes for the betterment of everyone and not just our personal belief systems.

I absolutely agree that religious groups should not force their beliefs on others, but this seems a bit backwards to me. If a woman wishes to cover her head, I could care less. I am not asking that the government force all people to use cannabis. I am saying that if one wishes to use cannabis, the governments have no right to say they can't. The law of the land is that God gave mankind all herbs, because that is the very first thing God said to mankind.

Then we have the churches, which comprise of the largest organizations in the world, supporting the government over extremely sick people that say this God given herb brings them better relief than pharmaceuticals. I'm not saying the churches should be forced to do anything. But the War on cannabis has proven to be a war against minorities, has caused countless mothers and fathers to lose their careers and children, has created a black market, and causes the governments to ravage the earth that God has prepared to destroy a plant that has been growing since the beginning.

Arresting and destroying people's lives for using a plant is immoral, and Yeshua says:

"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God." Matthew 5:9
 
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Technology has definitely improved to the point and I received something of an education on the matter with my wife's prescription at a legal "dispensary" that the dosage, of even very isolatable chemicals found within the plant, can be quite controlled and suggested doses with careful attention of how the patient reacts makes the situation very different from the 'Reefer Madness" movies (see youtube) days.

Having said that much, will also note that even the "medical person" giving my wife the legal prescription said these drugs, like many drugs, can fry your brain especially if abused. In her opinion and for that reason alone, the young who lack a fully formed brain (into 20s for most males) should avoid this drug as usage before the brain is fully formed is strongly suggested to interfere with that process and the youth are also most likely group to abuse it.

Thank you for sharing. I personally do not believe cannabis is going to "fry" anyone's brain, and many children need it for epilepsy. It has also been proven to be a much safer and more effective treatment for ADHD than the pharmaceutical company's version of methamphetamine. However, I do agree that kids should not be smoking pot, which leads me to my next point...

If you were to buy cannabis in a non-legal state, there are no warning labels. It comes in a clear plastic baggy. If you are under 21, the dealers are more than happy to sell it to you, and will probably offer other substances that can definitely ruin your life. Nobody is going to check your ID to make sure you're of age. And if your over 21, you might be a cop, so dealers are less likely to sell to you. If the governments and churches are concerned about the kids, this is a very backwards way of doing things.

I'm glad your wife is able to get the natural relief she needs, and kudos to you for supporting her. God bless you and your family.
 
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It says, for food, not for smoking. :)

I think it would be better to avoid using drugs. But I think people should also be free.
Hello 1213, it's been a while :wave:. I agree that smoking is not the best way to consume cannabis, though I don't think it's necessarily wrong. It's an incense, or the burning of dried herbs. What are your thoughts on consumables?
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
65
Left coast
✟100,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thank you for sharing. I personally do not believe cannabis is going to "fry" anyone's brain, and many children need it for epilepsy. It has also been proven to be a much safer and more effective treatment for ADHD than the pharmaceutical company's version of methamphetamine. However, I do agree that kids should not be smoking pot, which leads me to my next point...

If you were to buy cannabis in a non-legal state, there are no warning labels. It comes in a clear plastic baggy. If you are under 21, the dealers are more than happy to sell it to you, and will probably offer other substances that can definitely ruin your life. Nobody is going to check your ID to make sure you're of age. And if your over 21, you might be a cop, so dealers are less likely to sell to you. If the governments and churches are concerned about the kids, this is a very backwards way of doing things.

I'm glad your wife is able to get the natural relief she needs, and kudos to you for supporting her. God bless you and your family.
Am simply relaying what an obviously (to me) long term user and medically qualified (according to state gov anyway) offered as her opinion. Am not asking anyone to agree with her on that particular point, but two observations.

First, It is scientifically proven many drugs interfere with the proper formation of developing brains, true for in vetro and afterwards and for males that development apparently extends into the 20s. Am unclear why we should think a powerful drug like those present in this particular plant would be exempt from such effects, especially if abused.

Two as a group, and principally as an inappropriate response to wanting to express who they are, the youth are predisposed to abuse of drugs in general and this is a well established fact. Believe they are the highest if not still near the top of groups abusing alcohol and age restrictions came about because adults decided at some point that being responsible for their kids was the principally the government's job. But that is the culture we live in now.

So while this lady, an obvious long term advocate and user, endorses legalization she wishes they would restrict usage to make it harder for the young to abuse it - not necessarily remove it as an option to treat pain or appetites of the ill. She was suggesting restrictions on people at her level being freely able to choose (or not) to give someone underage what in practice is becoming a general use permit like a drivers license (like giving aspirin). The potential positive benefits are obvious, but so is the abuse obvious of it and it is not as simple as just a pain relief or calming agent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anonymouswho
Upvote 0

Big Drew

Believer
Site Supporter
Nov 10, 2009
1,885
540
Alabama
✟97,461.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
As a Christian I can't disagree with your stance...it's a natural plant...so do with it what you will. As a libertarian I do not believe the government has the right to decide in issues of morality...especially in cases like drug use where no one is being harmed except the individual. The argument is then made that it affects loved ones...but again, that's the individual's burden to bear. As long as you're not putting someone else's life in jeopardy then do whatever you want. If it goes against the will of God, you're the one that has to answer for that, as well. Personally, I've done it a few times over the course of my life...but it was never something I enjoyed...I prefer whiskey lol.

And, given all of the research that shows the medicinal benefits...it's a real shame that the feds have not lifted their ban.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anonymouswho
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is true in states that have legalized cannabis, but it still remains a Scheduled 1 Substance, and many states have yet to allow for medicinal use. The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of1961 still lists cannabis as a Scheduled 1 Substance as well, which means the U.S. is currently in violation of international law. Many countries still hold very harsh laws for cannabis use. Also, many churches have quoted Paul for years to claim that cannabis is bad because it's against the law. Rather than stand up for what God has made, they have sided with the governments to say God was wrong and made a mistake. Why aren't the churches on the forefront of getting medical cannabis legalized everywhere?

Why would churches be involved in any substance use issues?
As you said, churches are called to support government
and sobriety.
 
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why would churches be involved in any substance use issues?
As you said, churches are called to support government
and sobriety.
I'm like 100% certain I never said the churches were called to support either of those things. The churches are not called to support any government. Render unto Caecar what is Caecar's, and then pay him no other mind because we have a God and a King who tells us what we can and cannot do. But if the churches wish to stick their noses where it doesn't belong, at least support what God has made. I imagine an unrealistic world where the churches are growing medicine all over the world to help the sick and hungry, and growing hemp to provide supplies and homes for the needy.

What is all this talk about "drugs" and "substance abuse"? We're talking about a plant. And not just any plant, but a plant called cannabis, which is composed of several molecular compounds called cannabinoids. These cannabinoids are so identical to molecular compounds in our brain and central nervous system, the whole system is called our endocannabinoid system. We are literally built to ingest this herb. It's even abundant in breast milk, so it's essential for life. We've been lied to, and despite the thousands of scholarly articles written about cannabis, they continue to lie to us.
 
Upvote 0

Big Drew

Believer
Site Supporter
Nov 10, 2009
1,885
540
Alabama
✟97,461.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'm like 100% certain I never said the churches were called to support either of those things. The churches are not called to support any government. Render unto Caecar what is Caecar's, and then pay him no other mind because we have a God and a King who tells us what we can and cannot do. But if the churches wish to stick their noses where it doesn't belong, at least support what God has made. I imagine an unrealistic world where the churches are growing medicine all over the world to help the sick and hungry, and growing hemp to provide supplies and homes for the needy.

What is all this talk about "drugs" and "substance abuse"? We're talking about a plant. And not just any plant, but a plant called cannabis, which is composed of several molecular compounds called cannabinoids. These cannabinoids are so identical to molecular compounds in our brain and central nervous system, the whole system is called our endocannabinoid system. We are literally built to ingest this herb. It's even abundant in breast milk, so it's essential for life. We've been lied to, and despite the thousands of scholarly articles written about cannabis, they continue to lie to us.
You would really think, as money hungry as our government is, that they would just go ahead and legalize and tax it...but pharmaceutical lobbyists don't get paid then and then the powers that be don't get to line their pockets, so......
 
  • Like
Reactions: anonymouswho
Upvote 0

anonymouswho

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
366
124
35
✟24,458.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You would really think, as money hungry as our government is, that they would just go ahead and legalize and tax it...but pharmaceutical lobbyists don't get paid then and then the powers that be don't get to line their pockets, so......
You know, I don't think it's about money. These people already have more money than they know what to do with. I think it's about control. The DEA had (has) the exact same programs that the NSA had (has). The government doesn't want us growing our own medicine that is infinitely more healthy than pharmaceuticals, because they want us to be good little worker bees. They want us to numb our minds with man-made drugs, they want our children walking around like zombies on pharmaceutical methamphetamine, and when we get old, they want us to become fragile and die so they can brainwash the next generation. Next time you watch a pharmaceutical commercial, pay very close attention to the colors, the music, and the overall tone; especially the antidepressant drugs. Notice how the commercial will be sad, and then how much it brightens up when they name off the thousand side effects, then how it goes back to depressing you when their done with their list. It's insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Drew
Upvote 0

Big Drew

Believer
Site Supporter
Nov 10, 2009
1,885
540
Alabama
✟97,461.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
You know, I don't think it's about money. These people already have more money than they know what to do with. I think it's about control. The DEA had (has) the exact same programs that the NSA had (has). The government doesn't want us growing our own medicine that is infinitely more healthy than pharmaceuticals, because they want us to be good little worker bees. They want us to numb our minds with man-made drugs, they want our children walking around like zombies on pharmaceutical methamphetamine, and when we get old, they want us to become fragile and die so they can brainwash the next generation. Next time you watch a pharmaceutical commercial, pay very close attention to the colors, the music, and the overall tone; especially the antidepressant drugs. Notice how the commercial will be sad, and then how much it brightens up when they name off the thousand side effects, then how it goes back to depressing you when their done with their list. It's insane.
Good point, I hadn't thought about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anonymouswho
Upvote 0

1213

Disciple of Jesus
Jul 14, 2011
3,661
1,117
Visit site
✟161,199.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hello 1213, it's been a while :wave:. I agree that smoking is not the best way to consume cannabis, though I don't think it's necessarily wrong. It's an incense, or the burning of dried herbs. What are your thoughts on consumables?

Hello! :) I don’t see any good reason to use cannabis in any form. If I have understood correctly, cannabis is used for relaxing or something like that. I think that, and also all other mental things that people try to get with drugs can be achieved easily and more safely without drugs.
 
Upvote 0