let me explain why i dont support. but this time, im not going to put God in this. and of course, none of us are wrong. i believe im right because of my beliefs. so honestly, no one can be wrong
I guess that depends on how you define "right" and "wrong." I define "wrong," in this case, as in defiance of our Constitutional protection of equality under law.
faithfulone1219 said:
i don't support gay marriage because i see no use of it in our society.
Of what use is heterosexual marriage in our society? Christian marriage? How would you feel if someone said that they "saw no use" in allowing YOU to marry? Would that be valid?
faithful1219 said:
I am for things and issues that help out this country for the greater good and that will help us survive this world.
I'm in favor of people having the freedom to do what they see fit, as long as it does not violate anyone else's rights. I'm in favor of social justice and equality under law.
faithfulone1219 said:
yea i know we have orphan children in many cities looking for a home. yes that is true. i know that the human race is not lacking anyone right now.
So the reproductive argument against gay marriage is invalid. Okay.
faithfulone1219 said:
but in the natural world, it is male and female that make the future of the species. not the same sex.
1. There is homosexuality among many species in nature.
2. We are thinking animals, and have created for ourselves a civilization. Why must we take our cues from the natural world? If we did that in earnest, we'd have no clothes, no computers, no rapid transportation, no agriculture. If two people of the same gender are deeply in love and want to marry, what does it matter what giraffes do?
faithfulone1219 said:
ok, now you might fire back with 'there are couples that dont want children' ok. there are people like that. good for them. thats their own choice. if a married couple doesnt want children, they are only letting another couple have their children and let the population grow.
And there are some straight married couples that
do want children, and because of fertility problems cannot have those children in the natural way. They either adopt, or use science to solve their fertility problems (sperm donors, in vitro fertilization, surrogate mothers, etc.). Gay couples can do these things as well. No difference.
faithfulone1219 said:
i have no problem with gay couples, i just dont see why they want to get married.
Why do straight couples want to get married? Why does ANYONE want to get married?
Legal marriage confers a vast number of financial and legal benefits. It affects taxes, insurance, inheritance, hospital visitation, power-of-attorney, and many others (someone had a link to the full list awhile back... there were in excess of a hundred). Denying these benefits to gay couples by denying them access to marriage is discrimination.
faithfulone1219 said:
is it because they want to be looked at as a normal couple?
They
ARE a normal couple. They have every right to be seen as such.
faithfulone1219 said:
as in equal to a man and woman being married?
They ARE equal to a man and woman being married, and the law should recognize that.
faithfulone1219 said:
you know, with legal documentation and such?
The legal documentation, and all the priveleges it confers upon married couples.
faithfulone1219 said:
or what? because if gay marriage is going to be agreed on, what will gay couples get? really? what will they get out of having their marriages legalized? just the mere fact of saying 'im gay and im married'?
Equal protection under law, and all the rights and priveleges granted to married couples. The right to be let in to visit one's spouse in intensive care after a car accident, for instance. Many places only let in the immediate family, you know.
faithfulone1219 said:
thats what i dont understand. why should i agree to something i believe wont do anything to move this society into the future, that will help us with other situations, with other things that deal with the survival of this country.
Because inequality and injustice don't need to affect you personally in order to be wrong? Because the government has no business placing restrictions against things which cause no harm--especially when it means treating a segment of the population unequally?
faithfulone1219 said:
oh and please, if any of you are going to come out with 'gay people are our future' save it. we are all the future, not just the gay community.
Indeed, we are all the future, and so should be treated equally by the law.
faithfulone1219 said:
ok, so maybe america will legalize gay marriage in, oh say 3 years. then what? whats next?
I'm sure there are more social injustices out there that need addressing.
faithfulone1219 said:
what im trying to say here is that, to me, this isnt a big deal.
Of course not. You're not the one being told you can't marry.
faithfulone1219 said:
i dont want to say yes to something that wont make me feel more satisfied with this country.
Honest question: Does something have to benefit you personally in order for it to "make you feel more satisfied with this country"? Because I feel more satisfied with the country when steps are taken to correct legal inequality.
faithfulone1219 said:
if america says no to gay marriage, i just hope it goes on to bigger and better things.
Like what, exactly? Saying no to atheist marriage? When you talk about America leaving an injustice uncorrected and then "going on to bigger and better things," I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.
faithfulone1219 said:
americ is trying to make everyone happy. but there will always be a group of people not happy with the decision.
Which is why this decision shouldn't be about "making people happy," but doing what is legally, Constitutionally right--guaranteeing equality under law for all citizens.