• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Gay Adoption

wildernesse

Use less and live more.
Jun 17, 2002
1,027
5
46
Georgia
Visit site
✟31,673.00
Nature also shows us examples of females devouring males after mating and promiscuous behavior and harems of females for one male. "Nature" isn't always the best guide for we humans. :)

I think that studies have shown that there isn't a significant difference (statistically) in the sexual orientation of children raised by same-sex parents and heterosexual parents. (I'll try to find a study for you.) Anyway, you'd have to show that homosexuality is a bad thing for that to matter.

--tibac
 
Upvote 0

Blessed-one

a long journey ahead
Jan 30, 2002
12,943
190
43
Australia
Visit site
✟40,777.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
i mean human nature, it's male and female.
wouldn't it be unbalanced to a child's life to have same sex parents?

for a male and a female act differently, it's just not the same.

i guess this issue is subjected to personal opinons, how do you define a family these days, there's no definite rule because everything is changing so rapidly.
 
Upvote 0
Sep 15, 2002
6,416
462
✟31,530.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't have any evidence other than "I read it somewhere" (which is, I have found, the basis for many arguments around here), but having homosexual parents/guardians/adoptors/whatever does not mean anything other than he has two daddies or two mommies.

Responding to the topic: I would rather a heterosexual couple adopting, simply because it would bring less schoolyard torment to the child, but homosexual couples are capable of being as loving and nurturing as their straight counterparts.
 
Upvote 0

mac_philo

Veteran
Mar 20, 2002
1,193
4
Visit site
✟24,892.00
Faith
Atheist
Originally posted by Blessed-one
um.. would having homosexual parents influence on the child's future? by that i mean... would the child have a tendency to be gay as he grows up?

and nature has it that parents should be made up of a male and a female, that's the balance!

Nature also has it that immature offspring without parents generally starve or are devoured. Are we to understand that this would be a feasible alternative to adoption?

'Natural' is not equivalent to 'good.'
 
Upvote 0

TwinCrier

Double Blessed and spreading the gospel
Oct 11, 2002
6,069
617
55
Indiana
Visit site
✟32,278.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"I'd rather see a stable gay couple raising a kid than an unstable straight couple."

Stable gay?  That's an oxymoron.  Someone who gets off on the same plumbing is anything but stable.  Homosexuality is not a lifestyle, it's a deathstyle.  Everything about it promotes disease.  and on one final note: Ewwwwww!
 
Upvote 0

fragmentsofdreams

Critical loyalist
Apr 18, 2002
10,358
431
22
CA
Visit site
✟43,828.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by TwinCrier
"I'd rather see a stable gay couple raising a kid than an unstable straight couple."

Stable gay?  That's an oxymoron. 

There are countless homosexual couples that have been together for decades. This is about as stable as marriage.

Someone who gets off on the same plumbing is anything but stable.  Homosexuality is not a lifestyle, it's a deathstyle. 

Nice mantra. However, mantras don't become true just because you repeat them over and over again.

Everything about it promotes disease. 

Monogamous homosexual activity has about the same risk for disease as monogamous heterosexual activity, and promiscuous homosexual activity has abot the same risk for disease as heterosexual activity.

and on one final note: Ewwwwww!

And now we get to the core of the issue. A lot of people find homosexual sex icky and make justifications to support their aversion.
 
Upvote 0

eldermike

Pray
Site Supporter
Mar 24, 2002
12,089
624
76
NC
Visit site
✟20,209.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We are having this discussion because we live in a society that produces large numbers of unwanted children (a moral issue, purely a family values issue).

To solve the problem we discuss changing our corporate moral values concerning family values.

There is a missing element here, logic.

This discussion is about selfish, meaningless feelings. That is being kind.

Why do we have this large and growing supply of unwanted Children?

Because people live on the "pleasure principle".

Having children is more than "I want one".

Does anyone else see a problem with this logic? Let's give our moral compass a spin and see where it points next.

I know how to solve this. Lets have more sit.coms. on dysfunctional family life.

This thread is revealing.

One thing is a fact. Everyone here had a mother and a father.
 
Upvote 0
A good parent is a good parent, no matter their sexuality. If they have a stable home, a good income and have proven they have what it takes to care for and nurture a child, they should be allowed to apodt. So many poor children are in need of parents, but gay couples, singles and co-habiting heterosexual couple (not to mention married couples who are deemed too old etc) are not allowed. This is just damaging children, being moved between foster families and orphanages. The government needs to be a little more open minded and think of the children.
 
Upvote 0

Stormy

Senior Contributor
Jun 16, 2002
9,441
868
St. Louis, Mo
Visit site
✟67,254.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
but having homosexual parents/guardians/adoptors/whatever does not mean anything other than he has two daddies or two mommies
.


No this is not true. It is much different then two mommies or two daddys.
There is a child that I know of that lives in such a home. He lives with his mother and her "friend". When the children talk about their fathers... He tells the other children that mommy does not like boys, she only likes girls. This little boy has a very low self esteem. The person that cares for him while his "mommies" are at work tries hard to make him proud. She tells him that he will grow to be a fine man. He smiles and seems happy. But it does not last. It seems that it is far more important to him... what mommie thinks. :sigh:

Sin can hurt more than just the sinner.
 
Upvote 0

wildernesse

Use less and live more.
Jun 17, 2002
1,027
5
46
Georgia
Visit site
✟31,673.00
And one final note: Ewww! Really fat people having sex! Ewww! Old people having sex! Ewww! My parents having sex!

Based on how gross it is (for me, hypothetically) to think about these people having sex, none of them should be able to adopt children!!! I mean, Ewwww!

And Stormy: Shouldn't it be more important to a child what a parent thinks rather than a babysitter? If my (non-existant) child considered his babysitter's opinions over mine, there would be something terribly wrong with my parenting skills IMO.

--tibac
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by amie
I have absolutely no problem with gay adoption whatsoever. I think as long as the child is taken care of, clothed, fed, loved... those are the important things...not parental gender...
just my opinion though folks...

I feel the very same way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Upvote 0

Stormy

Senior Contributor
Jun 16, 2002
9,441
868
St. Louis, Mo
Visit site
✟67,254.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
Shouldn't it be more important to a child what a parent thinks rather than a babysitter?

wildernesse : I agree with you. A babysitter should in no way replace good parenting. But a child should not feel that his sex ( male) is of no worth. The kid is four years old and already undergoing an identity crisis because his gay mom opening flaunts her sexuality. He is confused and the sitter tries to make him feel good about himself. She is a beautiful person and I believe the child is blessed for having her to care for him.

So now, to complete my thoughts on the thread topic...

No I do not think gay adoption is good.

In fact if there was a way to get this child in a stable environment it would be good.

You can all speak of how good and loving you are because you promote gay adoption. Or you can talk against adoption because you want to punish the gays and not reward them with children.

But until you look at the truth of gay parenting though the eyes of a child your opinion is just that. Your opinion. I have seen the result of such a home and it breaks my heart.
 
Upvote 0

Morat

Untitled One
Jun 6, 2002
2,725
4
50
Visit site
✟27,690.00
Faith
Atheist
 Stormy: My neighbor's kid is the exact same way. He's got so many problems, and is never happy. Quite a little crises. My mother, who is trained to recognize such things, hopes that his parents get him to a therapist soon.

   Of course, his parents are a heterosexual couple.

   Oh wait! I've just shown why anecdotal stories aren't worth the effort it takes to type them, haven't I? Sorry, Stormy.

 
 
Upvote 0

mac_philo

Veteran
Mar 20, 2002
1,193
4
Visit site
✟24,892.00
Faith
Atheist
Even as an anecdote this story misses the mark, since being a lesbian has nothing to do with 'not liking men.' By this reasoning, men shouldn't be around daughters, and mothers shouldn't be around sons, since sexual orientation entails they 'don't like' who they aren't attracted to.

Your story seems to insinuate that this boy's mother tells him that she doesn't like any males. If so that's not because she's a lesbian, it's because she hates males.

Plenty of straight men hate women. Should we ban straight adoption?

Anecdotal evidence is worthless. There are unhappy children with every type of parent.
 
Upvote 0

ocean

Banned (just kidding)
Sep 25, 2002
1,426
3
45
van city
✟24,736.00
Faith
Agnostic
So, would forced abortion be better? If most people are against adoption of "unwanted" children by "unstable" (not a married, affulent, heterosexual couple) people, then abortion is the only answer. As for the children already here, would it be better for them to go from orphanage to orphanage until they're 16?

edited for clarity.
 
Upvote 0

coastie

Hallelujah Adonai Yeshua!
Apr 6, 2002
5,400
48
45
Central Valley of CA
Visit site
✟8,286.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
In response to that statement, I'd like to see some figures on how many heterosexual parents have been on waiting lists to adopt.

this is an statement from adoptionservices.org regarding the waiting:

How long is the wait to adopt a child? This is a complex question to answer!

Why?

Because your total waiting period to adopt a child depends upon many factors, including the race, age, health and nationality of the child, whether you find the child yourself through a private source or whether you work with an agency, the specific agency you select, your level of motivation to adopt, your total adoption budget, and (in foreign adoptions) your willingness to travel.

In general, healthy Caucasian newborns and infants are the most sought after children and the wait for these children can be many months to many years.

If you are willing/desirous of adopting a Black, bi-racial, or multi racial child, the wait may be much shorter - only a matter of a few months.

A special needs child, e.g. an older child, or a child with physical, emotional, or intellectual limitations, can often be adopted through special county, state, or private agencies in a relatively short period of time.

The waiting period for foreign-born children usually depends on the specific foreign country the child is adopted from and can vary from a few months to a few years.

.............................................................

Don't forget that adopting a foreign born child may involve significant travel. While some countries allow you to adopt the child and have the child escorted to the US, others require you to make 1 or 2 trips to the foreign country.

And don't forget your total waiting period will include the several days, weeks, or months you have to stay in the foreign country.

The best way to find out how long YOUR specific adoption will take is to write down all your questions. Then personally call the agency, talk to the staff, and have all your questions answered.



Now I don't have any hard numbers on adoptions, but I can tell you that there is no shortage of people wanting to adopt. As a matter of fact there are two couple in my church on a waiting list, and I know several adoptees and families that have adopted.

The correlation between abortion and outlawing gay adoption is non-substantiated as far as my research has taken me.
 
Upvote 0