• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Gap creationism v. progressive creationism..

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
Concerning the 7 days of creation, Genesis is also know as the first book of the law of Moses. So what if God gave Moses a vision of the creation for 7 days when he was on Mt Sinai? That is 7 days in the prophet's time frame - literal 24 hours days for Moses. And what if the point of the 7 days is simply to characterize God as creating each particular thing, as opposed to the popular religion at the time (polytheism) that had separate gods creating each thing? Read in that sense opens up a lot of possibilities in terms of how God did it and what historically happened, which would accommodate known scientific facts.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Hugh Ross has a similarly convoluted gap theory, that just does not square with Scripture. This really isn't all that new, there was a theory in Darwin's day called catastrophism. They believe that the earth had seen creation before but was destroyed in some kind of cataclysm like the flood. I'm fine with a six day creation, except I think there might be a gap between verse 1 and 2. However the earth would have been devoid of life until six thousand years ago.
 
Upvote 0

Hiscosmicgoldfish3

Active Member
Mar 11, 2018
274
96
61
Barnstaple
✟27,369.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Hugh Ross has a similarly convoluted gap theory, that just does not square with Scripture. This really isn't all that new, there was a theory in Darwin's day called catastrophism.

Hugh Ross believes in progressive creation - that the days in Genesis 1 are not days but ages. I suppose he thinks that creation happens every so often, millions of years, like with the standard evolution model, except without evolution - same uniformitarian idea.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,121
3,437
✟995,869.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

I think we go too far when we hyper analysis the creation account. the words and order have value and meaning but we miss the point when we try and reconcile it with modern science. I don't think it fits nor will it ever fit nor was it intended to fit. I'm not necessarily advocating evolution (I'll keep silent on that one) I'm just saying we are approaching it wrong as a literal account with or without gaps.
 
Reactions: jsimms615
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
His theory is actually quite elaborate and he is simply allegorizing the text of Scripture.theres no figurative language in Genesis and it's obviously presented as an historical narrative. Because of that the literal interpretation is always preferred. The vidios did a pretty nice job on analyzing the original, that alone made it worthwhile as an exposition.
 
Upvote 0

Hiscosmicgoldfish3

Active Member
Mar 11, 2018
274
96
61
Barnstaple
✟27,369.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single

I think the second creation account (chapter 2) is allegorical, whereas the first account is literal. The compilers of the bible were wise enough to retain both accounts, despite them being contradictory - the second account is describing the fall of man, and the involvement of the serpent. Some would try to harmonize both accounts.

Others would say that we have to accept the second account of creation, but the first account is not specific about the creation of man - just that man was created - doesn't state that there was one woman or man, or how long ago - although I suspect there was one woman, and one serpent - probably in East Africa.
How would the various peoples end up all over the world, if we are going to accept the Ham, Shem and Japheth idea - I think it is more likely that homo-sapiens migrated out of Africa and started to hunt Neanderthals, (with guns) - and some intermixing.
 
Upvote 0

jsimms615

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2006
11,019
1,712
✟190,340.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I believe what you are referring to is called the Old Earth theory meaning that God created the earth and it looked much older than it was on the first day of its existence.
Your right that nothing is impossible with God.
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,172
Florida
Visit site
✟811,723.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Some people looked at paleontology, old earth theory, and also searched the texts of the Bible. They decided the earth is indeed very old. God is likewise very old and wise. The earth was not built in a day. God guided the advancement of species and some called it "intelligent design." People may procreate, but that life is limited to less than 123 years modern times. Many died before they were 80. It is the Holy Spirit who can give life and the Holy Spirit can take away life.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Really no reason the think the second chapter is figurative. Some of the naming conventions, 'Adam, Eve, and Serpent have figurative meanings buts the extent of it. It's popular with some evangelicals, is that there was a local flood and other communities that survived the flood. Neith a figurative interpretive or a local flood can be reconciled with the clear meaning of the text. Neanderthals had a migration pattern fonsistant with Noah and his family emerging from the Ark in modern Turkey. Their remains are found from Iraq to Spain, very often in caves indicating a practice common to this day. The Neanderthal had a brain 20% greater then our own, religion, tools and weapons of various kinds. DNA comparisons indicated their genome would have been compatible with our own.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,121
3,437
✟995,869.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm not declaring the earth is old/young I'm just saying the creation account doesn't help us determine either one.
 
Upvote 0

wonderkins

Active Member
Jul 16, 2017
309
215
Winlock
✟166,268.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Chapter 2 is not allegorical. It just goes into more specific detail of the creation of man. You see this kind of writing in other areas of the Bible too.

Kind of like:

1. I went to the store today
2. Today when I went to the store, I got some milk, eggs, and a can of coffee.

Nothing allegorical. Just more detailed.
 
Upvote 0

Jamsie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 2, 2017
2,211
1,278
74
Vermont
✟348,624.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I would have little to do with any church that made the view of creation such a basic issue.
While it is important, and my comment shows the fundamental flaw in 'gap age theory'. It is not a salvation issue, just one of reason.

I agree, though it can be an interesting discussion. Here is a brief overview of another perspective/interpretation:

1. Each day of creation is begun not with God doing something but saying something ..."And God said". (The origin of everything by one cause...the Word of God.)

a. Genesis 1 has a consistent construction -Command - accomplishment/fulfillment - activity after fulfillment - designated day.

b. Clearly "And God said" is the sole and only operative agent, God's command was the source of creation.. (Gen. 1 - Psalm 33:6 - Heb 11:3 - 2 Peter 3:5)

c. If, as Genesis states, that "Let there be..."Let the land...""Let the waters..." is the lone and unique agent then statements following would by necessity be explanatory. (Otherwise one would need to show that God's Word/command was not the sufficient cause of creation)

d. "And God made..." statements are not the operative agent but an explanation of results.

e. God's commands do not necessitate complete fulfillment within each day.

1.As an example Genesis 1:6,9,11,20,24 depict processes.

2.Further example Gen. 1:24 avoids "And God said, Let there be living creatures." as do the other verses attached to days.

So in 6 days God commanded all of the "laws" for the incipient powers, elements, material, etc. as to the natural processes of phenomena to be produced, just as they are today. Upon each fiat or command nothing more remained to be done. The time frames whether as science avers or otherwise finds the Genesis passage silent.
 
Upvote 0

Anguspure

Kaitiaki Peacemakers NZ
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2011
3,865
1,768
New Zealand
✟148,435.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The really neat thing about the way God has created things to be is that both long age and short age creation can be true:
Gerald Schroeder - Articles - Age of the Universe
 
Upvote 0

Hiscosmicgoldfish3

Active Member
Mar 11, 2018
274
96
61
Barnstaple
✟27,369.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
The really neat thing about the way God has created things to be is that both long age and short age creation can be true:
Gerald Schroeder - Articles - Age of the Universe
The YECs say that the population of humans, being such a successful species, would not equate with 150,000 years - so they predict population figures, working out at 6000 years. I think there is some merit to those ideas - I don't know really, the age of mankind. The YECs might be correct in their estimate of 10,000 years for mankind - the gap theory would allow for the age of coal being over 50,000 years - as that coal was formed by the great flood - before the gap, in my humble.
The gap theory would also allow for the evo's belief that homo-eretcus existed for 2 million years, and died out 1.8 million years ago.
I recently saw evidence, that hedgehogs and flamingos were found in the same fossil beds as dinosaurs - but the museums had not presented the evidence as it was contrary to their evo doctrine. The biblical kinds existed before the gap, and then after the gap - both mammals and dinos etc.
 
Reactions: Anguspure
Upvote 0

DarkSoul999

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2017
437
163
40
New Britain
✟52,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Real people witnessed Christ return from the grave.

The fantasy of a young flat Earth exists only in the minds of loopy modern Christians.

Genesis 1 was NEVER supposed to be a geology lesson. It was and is a highly abbreviated picture of the world meant to express God's role and power. A complete picture would fill a thousand books just like it does now!
 
Upvote 0

DarkSoul999

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2017
437
163
40
New Britain
✟52,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The really neat thing about the way God has created things to be is that both long age and short age creation can be true:
Gerald Schroeder - Articles - Age of the Universe

I agree. If it was written to be highly specific like so many creation myths it would be totally dismissed by now.

The deliberate vagueness of Genesis caused Christians to invent early European science. Had it been a straight up creation myth about planet sized turtles we wouldn't even be typing on computers right now! xD
 
Reactions: Anguspure
Upvote 0

DarkSoul999

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2017
437
163
40
New Britain
✟52,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
This Holy Bible, God's Inspired, Infallible and Inerrant Word, says NO! Who really gives a hoot about science or the like, they are ALWAYS WRONG!

You are typing on a computer built by scientists. You are typing over an internet built by scientists. You are using electricity discovered by scientists. Your continued existence probably involved medicine and food made by scientists. Was your comment meant as a joke? If not then I don't even want to know...unbelievable ingratitude and hypocrisy.
 
Reactions: fat wee robin
Upvote 0

DarkSoul999

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2017
437
163
40
New Britain
✟52,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Yep. It is not possible for any human, especially a below average human to comprehend infinite intelligence. God does not see ANY events in sequence. He already saw Christ on the cross when the early chapters of the Old Testament were still being written. Past, present, and future are totally interchangeable where he is sitting!
 
Upvote 0

DarkSoul999

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2017
437
163
40
New Britain
✟52,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The sequence of the days is clear. Sadly, some want to obfuscate them and put others down.

Sequence means NOTHING to an infinite timeless being. Genesis could simply be a random selection of days and in random order and it would change absolutely nothing because the Bible makes it abundantly clear over and over again that God doesn't even notice a difference between past, present, and future tense. Only weakling mortals notice the movement of space and time.

"He said to them, “It is not for you to know times or seasons that the Father has fixed by his own authority." (Acts 1:7)

"And saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.”"
(Mark 1:15)

"But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance."
(2 Peter 3:8-9)

The celestial objects THEMSELVES generate our human perception of time:

"He made the moon to mark the seasons; the sun knows its time for setting."
(Psalm 104:19)

Now this verse will confuse you to no end because it directly contradicts a linear interpretation of the Bible:

"Behold, I will make the shadow cast by the declining sun on the dial of Ahaz turn back ten steps.” So the sun turned back on the dial the ten steps by which it had declined." (Isaiah 38:8)

God moves time backwards and forwards like it is nothing. Sequence means nothing. It only means something to weakling mortals.
 
Upvote 0

DarkSoul999

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2017
437
163
40
New Britain
✟52,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

This is a brilliant comment! I didn't even consider that.
 
Upvote 0