I note that Michael has resumed his campaign in trying to destroy the professional reputation of Brian Koberlein this time at Reddits.
Not only is Michael using Reddits to engage in personal attacks against members in this forum to get around his current suspension, but he is now baiting members to confront Koberlein’s “dishonesty” in claiming that neutrinos do not exist in Scott’s and Thornhill’s models.
In other words Michael wants members here to carry on with his hatchet job on Koberlein which ultimately led to his suspension for one year.
My golf clubs emit neutrinos.
If anyone accepted this notion on the basis because I said so would be extremely naïve and gullible.
Yet Scott and Thornhill can make the same sweeping generalizations about their models producing neutrinos to the point of it being an afterthought.
I have yet to see anything where Scott and Thornhill explain how neutrinos are formed in their models or a whether the production rate compares to experimental values.
Since Scott and Thornhill only have to state their models produce neutrinos and nothing else indicates the very low standards these models are held to by their supporters.
The facts are that neither model can produce neutrinos which are the result of nuclear fusion.
In Scott’s model neutrinos are produced in the chromosphere and photosphere.
Nuclei must have a sufficiently high kinetic energy through high temperatures to overcome the
Coulomb barrier for fusion to occur.
Using Michael’s “it can be reproduced in the laboratory” nonsense fails because plasma temperatures in Z pinch machines such as
Tokamaks require plasma temperatures of up to 100 million K for fusion to occur.
These high temperatures are necessary as the Z pinch is not capable of sustaining densities that are found in the Sun’s core.
By comparison the highest temperatures in the chromosphere are around 20000K.
Where does Scott explain how Z pinch fusion can occur at such low temperatures and densities?
Then there are the other unfortunate side effects such as the Earth being burnt to a crisp and irradiated with gamma photons.
Thornhill’s model is even more ridiculous because he boldly declares anti matter doesn’t even exist and a neutrino is composed of an electron and positron which he considers is not an anti particle.
Thornhill has decided to make up his own particle which he has called a neutrino which bears absolutely no resemblance to its actual physical properties.
By having fusion at or near the surface results in the
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram being completely wrong given the maximum
effective temperatures achieved in stars is around 30000K.
Scott’s and Thornhill’s models would predict temperatures in the range of tens of millions K.
Koberlein was spot on by claiming neither model produces neutrinos.
