From faith to fact.

[amariselle]

What challenges?

Since it seems that we must start back at the beginning of this conversation, please refer to the question I asked above.

 

[Loudmouth]

Since it seems that we must start back at the beginning of this conversation, please refer to the question I asked above.

It never began. You make allegations that you never back up. In order to start a conversation, you need to supply some evidence for your allegations.

 

[amariselle]

It never began. You make allegations that you never back up. In order to start a conversation, you need to supply some evidence for your allegations.

Please refer to my post in the related thread we are debating in currently.

I agree to disagree.

Darwinian Evolutionary Theory (despite the scientific understanding of the word) is actually no more than just that, as far as I'm concerned.

You can believe it, that's your choice. I don't believe it, that is my choice.

Have a nice day.

 

[Loudmouth]

Please refer to my post in the related thread we are debating in currently.

That entire thread is also absent of any evidence to back your claims.

 

[USincognito]

Because Darwinian Evolutionary Theory does not answer all the questions it claims to.

Don't be coy. Why don't you cite a couple of examples?

As I said, both Creationism and Darwinian Evolution require faith.

Repeating an inane thing doesn't make it any less inane.

 

[USincognito]

Please refer to my post in the related thread we are debating in currently.

Why is it so hard for some folks making a claim to use the multi-quote function, find the post where they supposedly addressed the issue and quote it elsewhere? That would take less time and four or five posts reiterating that they "already addressed that".

 

[tallbouy]

Why is it so hard for some folks making a claim to use the multi-quote function, find the post where they supposedly addressed the issue and quote it elsewhere? That would take less time and four or five posts reiterating that they "already addressed that".

Because that would deny her the chance to deny she said something or allow her to say that she said something.
It's sometimes called 'wiggle room', being trapped in so many corners make some believers masters at it.

 

[Archaeopteryx]

Because Darwinian Evolutionary Theory does not answer all the questions it claims to. If you put your trust in it, there will come a time when you too need to say "I don't know."

Instead, however, you continue to claim that Darwinian Evolutionary Theory provides conclusive answers that are, in fact far from conclusive. And many Evolutionary Scientists have questioned this Theory as well.

As I said, both Creationism and Darwinian Evolution require faith.

But that simply isn't true. As I said before, we accept evolution because there is evidence strong enough to warrant its acceptance. It represents our best understanding of how life on Earth diversified over time, giving us the species we have today. I have never suggested that you should accept evolution on faith, because it doesn't require faith.

For questions on which we are still ignorant, such as the origin of the universe, I have never invoked faith either. Instead, I have said that we should acknowledge the mystery that still surrounds that question and continue inquiring.

 

[Archaeopteryx]

Criticize it all you want. It's completely your choice what you do or don't do with the Bible. No one gets to make that choice for you. (Or for anyone else.)

As I said before, that is what 'dogma' tends to imply. You accept the doctrines of your religion as incontrovertibly true, but it appears that you won't allow yourself to honestly question them.