I am sorry to break this to you, but there is agreement between the major denominations of Christianity as to what constitutes a Christian..there may be minor differences, but there are some core characteristics
And what, pray, would they be? True, Hitler instigated the xenophobic murder of millions. But it was for the good of mankind.
Isn't that what God did, during the Flood, during the sacking of Sodom and Gomorrah (and the other two, I forget), during Jesus' destruction of the Temple, during said Jesus' crucifixtion? Impressive lists of Biblical atrocities aside, God kills men for the embetterment of mankind. Was Hitler not doing God's work, as he saw it?
Regardless, no one could look at the Bible with a straight face and say Hitler was a Christian by any stretch of the imagination
I can. Look at my straight face. Very straight (oh bless the irony of my orientation).
Regardless, noone could look at the Bible with a straight face and say you, or the Pope, or Martin Luther, were/are a Christian by any stretch of the imagination.
And the Third Reich was steeped in the occult. A Christian can't be both
The Occult deals with hidden knowledge (just look at its etymology). Moses uses hidden knowledge when he freed the Jews (?) from Egypt. You appeal for change by unknown methods whenever you pray. Life is created, and death enacted, by unknown means (soul-wise).
Using the popular, if inaccurate, usage of the word 'Occult', the Third Reich was indeed 'steeped' in it. However, you can still be a Christian, just not a very good Christian.
I am committing no fallacy. Just pointing out the fact that Hitler was as far from a Christian as a Christian could get.
So he WAS a Christian then??
What do you percieve to be better, a human mind capable of sending machines to mars and walking on the moon, or a simple bacterium swimming aound in some filthy water? Any logical thinking human understands that humans are "better" than all animals. I'm sorry your animalistic mind can't understand that.
Not only is that analogy putting bacterial locomotion as 'better' than interstellar travel (by any logic), you appeal to the qualitative: calling the water 'filthy', or the bacterium 'simple' is both fallicious and inaccurate. The moon is simple, when compared to all the other facets of your argument: it is simply a giant ball of rock hanging in space. Big whoop.